Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Land Disconnection’ Category

There was no mention of the data center discussions which began in October in President Cecola’s quarterly Village Newsletter distributed last week. So much for transparency.

Last week we published a series of editorials to enlighten residents on the, “110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board.” We referenced Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) records we obtained, and several people have asked if they might obtain a copy.

Those records we were provided, edited only to eliminate redundancy such as multiple copies of the “Data Center Overview,” can be found here.

Related:Do you trust our Board of Trustees? We don’t. But you decide for yourself once we have finished. (Part 3),” “Do you trust our Board of Trustees? We don’t. But you decide for yourself once we have finished. (Part 2),” “Do you trust our Board of Trustees? We don’t. But you decide for yourself once we have finished. (Part 1),” “7 things to know about Illinois data centers,” “Data Center group concerned over pause,” “110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board

 

Read Full Post »

Source: Brennan Investment Group December 15, 2025 presentation to the Barrington Hills Board of Trustees

Last month during the February 23rd Board of Trustees meeting, Trustees and attendees heard public comments from:

  • Carson Rice
  • Karen Trzaska
  • Julie Becker
  • Austin Becker, and
  • Aaron Becker

This marked the second Board meeting since the now infamous, “110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board,” was made public and residents were afforded an opportunity to share their thoughts. To follow are the Public Comments of one resident who spoke after having benefit of the review of records received from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents related to the Data Center pitch:

“I’m Karen Traska… It’s kind of good that I’m following him because I might have a few of your answers.

You know, before I came here, I was pretty mad. And now I’m standing in front of you guys and I’m sad. Like, I’m really sad.

Last time I was standing up here, we were talking about this data center that came out of nowhere, right? It just sort of popped up. They just showed up like 5 minutes before the meeting. It wasn’t on the agenda because, you know, they just kind of showed up, and, the last time I was here, I was also waiting for my FOIA request, and I got my FOIA request.

So turns out, October 8th, our Village Administrator, Anna Paul, put a meeting in the calendar with the Brennan Investment Group and what seems to be their attorneys for the data center. October 21st, you guys had the meeting with Brennan.

…November 10th, Brennan followed up with Anna to see what the feedback was. A week later, November 17th, Board of Trustee meeting. It wasn’t on the agenda. It wasn’t brought up.

December 15th, 2 months after the meeting, Board of Trustee meeting again. It wasn’t on the agenda, but now, as we all know, a 25-minute presentation discussion, but apparently not even some of the trustees knew about it until that moment. Community didn’t know about it. We couldn’t show up to listen or engage. It wasn’t until mid-January that word really gets out to the community.

All hell breaks loose, right? We’re all here at the meeting, January 26th. And President Cecola, Brian, you sat here and repeatedly stated that no one, no one on this Board wanted a data center, right? No one wanted it. And nobody raised their hand, contradicted him. No one said, well, actually, no, I did.

Well, Tuesday, December 16th, the day after the presentation with Brennan, Trustee Strauss, who’s not here unfortunately, to Wes Levy, the Village Treasurer, and Anna Paul, the Village Administrator.

Wes, nicely done last night. Can you ask Anna to share the information we received last night from Brennan Investment Group about a possible data center development?

Levy responds, hi, Trustee Strauss. Anna brought this one to my attention a couple weeks ago. I am sure there will be concessions and property tax forgiveness as part of a deal to bring them in, but if they do come, it will be significant revenue.

Then Strauss emails Cecola,

Brian, my opinion is we need to take this very seriously. Opportunities like this do not surface often. We would need to make certain we can lock up the project and the necessary requirements short-term and long-term, but based on the location, I believe the developer is for sure going to be very open to making concessions.

Same time, Trustee Hoffman was sending an article citing energy usage concerns. Thank you.

And Strauss replied with an article of his own regarding some small town in Quincy, Washington, and how they love the data center. He shared,

I have done a lot of research the last 2 days, and these centers are legit. Below is a small community and the impact that I sent to Brian yesterday. And it was all these statistics. To which then Trustee Clarke responded, Thanks. I agree with Trustee Strauss.

That’s just what was sent to me. There were 2 emails with a staff member and the attorney not sent to me, apparently due to some attorney-client privilege, which I don’t understand because I thought the village was the client, like the residents were the client, but maybe not. I will be asking about that later.

Allegedly, other conversations were had off record with more than just Strauss and Clarke being in favor of the data center. Allegedly, allegedly, allegedly.

I do want to thank Trustees Ekstrom and Hoffman, whether in emails that I received or in public meetings in front of all of us, or both, for standing up for our Village and its unique character, as well as for calling for transparency, not just in the community but within your own Board. I hope in the future we can go back to the transparency that we had with our previous Village President.

Again, this whole thing makes me really sad. So that’s all I have to say. Thank you.”

A transcript of comments from the February 23rd Board meeting can be found here, and the audio recordings of the entire meeting can be found here.

The Village posted the following after the February 2nd Special Plan Commission meeting was cancelled:

“Based on initial feedback, the developer for a possible data center in the Village of Barrington Hills has decided not to go forward with a presentation at the informational Plan Commission meeting.

At this time, the Village considers this matter closed and does not anticipate any further discussion.”

Few if any believe the matter to be closed.

As an aside, the Plan Commission last met on October 2nd, 2025, just six (6) days prior to the Brennan meeting being scheduled by the Village Administrator, per FOIA documents obtained. See Draft Minutes of the October 2, 2025, Meeting.

We thought the timing to be interesting. We also find it interesting that the FOIA records show no evidence of contact between the Village and Brennan Investment Group in advance of October 8th, 2025, when the Village scheduled the October 21st, 2025, meeting. Nothing. No emails with introductory materials, no emails confirming the meeting.

Editorial note: In “Part 1” of our series we neglected to include the “Data Center Overview” posted by the Village on January 16th, 2026. This has since been corrected.

Related:Do you trust our Board of Trustees? We don’t. But you decide for yourself once we have finished. (Part 2),” “Do you trust our Board of Trustees? We don’t. But you decide for yourself once we have finished. (Part 1),” “7 things to know about Illinois data centers,” “Data Center group concerned over pause,” “110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board

Read Full Post »

Village of Barrington Hills board members (l-r) JC Clarke, Laura AB Ekstrom, Brian Cecola, Marsha McClary, David Riff and Jessica Hoffmann. Not pictured: Thomas Strauss.

On December 22, 2025, the Observer posted an article: “110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board.” If you’ve not read the post, please do so before proceeding.

There are some points we should have included but didn’t because of our desire to post before the holiday. Those added points include:

  • Anyone, whether a Village resident or not, is allowed to make Public Comment at the beginning of Board meetings. The Board rules have limited these Public Comments to three (3) minutes (see December 15, 2025, Agenda & Notice of Meeting: “Be advised that public comment at the meeting is limited to three (3) minutes per person…”). There were no public comments that evening.
  • The twenty (20) minute “110 Acre AI data center” pitch was made following Agenda Item 6.1, Planning, 29 minutes into the meeting and well after Public Comment concluded. As such, no procedural rule limited the guest speaker’s time.
  • The “110 Acre AI data center” pitch was not identified anywhere on the December 15th In fact, just prior to the guest speaker’s introduction by President Cecola as a guest who “we invited to come speak,” the Planning Committee Chair reported that the Plan Commission had not met and she had nothing to report. (The Zoning Committee Chair similarly reported that the Zoning Board had not met and she had nothing to report.)

The Minutes from the December 15th meeting, which were approved and voted on unanimously by the Board at the January 26th meeting,  summarize the twenty (20) minute “110 Acre AI data center” pitch” as follows:

We have no doubt a significant amount of extra time, expense effort was devoted to this since the Observer provided residents a heads up in its article 110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board, and, before the December minutes were approved, the Village posted what follows on its Facebook Page and Website on January 16th:

Special Plan Commission Meeting to Welcome Resident Input

For the Consideration of a Possible Data Center Development

A data center developer has approached the Village regarding a large property within the Village, at the edge of its southwest boundary (see figures A & B). As an informational step, the developer provided a brief overview presentation to the Board of Trustees at its December 15, 2025, meeting. The PDF of the presentation may be viewed by following this link: Data Center Overview

During the presentation, the developer stated that, if a data center were ultimately built, the Village would experience a significant financial impact, including increased annual utility tax revenue in the millions for the Village and a reduction in residents’ property tax contributions. The developer estimated that the site’s property tax could increase from approximately $3,000 annually to as much as $20 million annually after reaching full operation. These figures were presented by the developer and have not been independently reviewed or verified by the Village.

A data center is not a use contemplated in the Village’s Comprehensive Plan. The Board of Trustees believes that any consideration of such a proposal should begin with a public information session and meaningful input from its residents.

Importantly, no decisions have been made, and the Village is not endorsing or approving a data center development. At this time, the Village is seeking resident input. As a preliminary and exploratory step, the Board has asked the developer to make a public presentation at a Special Meeting of the Plan Commission.

Residents are encouraged to attend the presentation at a Special Meeting of the Plan Commission:

Monday, February 2, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.
Countryside Elementary School
205 W. County Line Road
Barrington Hills, IL 60010

Questions or comments before or after the meeting may be submitted to datacenter@vbhil.gov.

The primary purpose of this meeting is to allow the developer to present its concept and potential benefits, and to give residents and the Plan Commission an opportunity to share their initial thoughts, questions, and concerns regarding whether the Village should consider this type of development.

Following the presentation, the Commission and members of the public will have the opportunity to make comments and ask questions. It is expected that many questions will require additional review and follow-up. Any responses would be provided at a future meeting or through other forms of communication.

If, after the presentation and public input, it is determined that the Village is willing to consider the proposal, the Village would then work to define a transparent process that will include additional opportunities for public engagement. The structure and scope of any such process have not yet been determined. The developer has committed to covering the costs associated with the review process, including the Village’s use of outside consultants, facilities, or experts, as such reviews may occur.”

The Village Website doesn’t allow for comments, but their Facebook post was commented on 56 times and shared 44 times.

With all of this unexpectedly hitting the fan for the most part in less than a month, one might assume many residents would appear at the January 26, 2026, Board of Trustees meeting. Well, they did.

In our next post we’ll share what those residents had to say.

Related:7 things to know about Illinois data centers,” “Data Center group concerned over pause,” “110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board

Read Full Post »

The state’s data center boom is reshaping energy, water use and taxes. Here’s what residents should know about the costs, jobs and incentives involved.

By Brennan Park | Illinois Policy Institute

Data centers are expanding across Illinois amid the tech industry’s rising demand for cloud computing. Supporters say the facilities bring investment and jobs, while critics worry about rising energy costs, environmental effects and tax incentives.

Illinois lawmakers are considering passing more stringent regulations on the growth and operation of data centers, with bills recently introduced in the House and Senate. These bills would require “hyperscale” data centers to expand renewable energy and “strengthen equity, transparency, and labor standards in clean energy initiatives,” among other new rules.

Here’s what every Illinoisan should know about the data center boom and tradeoffs the state makes to be a part of it.

1: Illinois is already a major data center hub, with the growth accelerating

Illinois boasts the fourth-highest number of data centers in the country, at 244 sites. That’s because the state provides much of what data center developers need: energy, environment and space.

These facilities need large amounts of reliable, clean electricity. They also require a cool, stable climate and ready access to water to prevent overheating. Illinois’ weather, rivers and proximity to Lake Michigan provide those conditions.

Flat land and industrial sites also make it easier and cheaper to build large-scale facilities. Illinois has a lot of both.

Most of the current development is concentrated in Chicago and its suburbs, with new projects from companies such as STACK InfrastructurePrime Data Centers and Prologis.

Aurora is home to Prologis Project Steel, with 24 completed data center buildings, and Project Cardinal, with 14. Southern and central Illinois are also proving attractive. CyrusOne is slated to host a 600-megawatt data center campus in Springfield, one of the largest proposed in the state.

Article continues here.

Related: 110 Acre AI data center campus pitched to Village Board

Read Full Post »

Courtesy Brennan Investment Group website

Our Board of Trustees had an unannounced guest speak last Monday evening at their regular monthly meeting. The unofficial transcript of what was discussed goes something like this:

Cecola: So, we have, um, somebody be the name, a guest in the audience out there, who somebody approached the Village regarding, um, data center, and we invited him to come and speak for about five (5) minutes, so (unintelligible) here. Um, there’s nothing to be voted on, there’s nothing to (unintelligible) the Trustees know the Village know (unintelligible with multiple people speaking).

Speaker: This doesn’t amplify, (unintelligible). To start I just wanted to thank everybody for your time (unintelligible interruption), oh sure, Jack Brennan, with Brennan Investment Group, and I just wanted to start by thanking you because I know I was squeezed in last minute here, so I’ll keep it very brief. 

Uh Brennan, we’re owner and operator of commercial properties throughout the US. We’re headquartered in Rosemont, but we have about nineteen offices across the US, and um, the purpose of tonight’s very brief presentation is, just was hoping to get some feedback on a proposed development in Barrington Hills.

We have a hundred and ten (110) acres site under contract roughly at the corner of Penny Road and 68, uh, in Barrington Hills that’s adjacent to, you know, the Palumbo tucking depot and all of that, and, um, our company over the last five years has done a lot on the, uh, Artificial Intelligence data center side. We’ve developed a number of campuses for Microsoft and a hand full of kind of third-party data center end users, and are working on one in Rolling Meadows right now.

Uh, I was introduced to this site through a friend of mine and, long story short, just given it’s proximity to the high voltage lines owned by ComEd, it makes itself a perfect powered land, so I, and um, you know our proposal for this, for this property here would, um, you know, would nbe to develop a data center campus.

The benefits, um, of this proposed development is first very low impact. Typically, these are fully enclosed with abundant privacy landscaping and walls and all the features so that it’s not a nuisance from a viewing standpoint. They also to emit very little noise. There’s virtually any (no) employees. There’s no burden on any roads.

Um, and then from an economic incentive standpoint, um, typically a project of this size would cost about two billion to develop, so from a real estate property tax you’d be looking at between twenty and forty million annually in real estate tax.  And then on top of that there’s a utility tax for the, uh, for the electric which goes to the municipality, and a project of this size would generate over ten million annually, in, um, utility tax, so anywhere from thirty to fifty million in revenue for a project such as this.

So, you know, first off I know this is out of character, uh, just for Barrington Hills in terms of the history, but you know I did think it in was kind of compelling we’re working on a number of these throughout the US, and, um, just kind of wanted to open up for feedback, because if it’s a quick no, I understand. Um, but at the same time, you know, I do think that it, um, it could be a great outcome, so, and, and, very feasible. We have end users that would move in quickly here, so just kind of wanted to open it up to any specific questions or any feedback you may have.

The discussion which ensued lasted twenty minutes. The presentation and discussion begins at the 29:10 of the meeting recordings found here. First, last and most frequent comments were made by Trustee Laura “AB” Ekstrom (She should seriously consider allowing that perpetual sunburn on her tongue heal one of these days).

The proposal may be brought before the Village Plan Commission in 2026, and there are some considerations residents should be made aware of.

The 110-acre property appears to border Barrington Hills and East Dundee. It is unclear if our Village still has a current Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with East Dundee. Given the magnitude of this development, we doubt if anything like this would have been foreseen or would stand up in court if Brennan wished to de-annex.

Our Village has boasted lower taxes and levies for over a decade, however that has likely come to an end. The Village Treasurer suggested that for a number of reasons, the Village reserves will require some attention. Any potential litigation would likely be costly and maybe even cost prohibitive.

If you are surprised by this news, we were too. Hopefully in the new year our Village Board will take a more proactive role in keeping residents informed if this proposal moves forward.

Related:Hoffman Estates could see third data center campus with sale of Plum Farms property

Read Full Post »

By Julie Tappendorf | Municipal Minute

An Illinois Appellate Court recently upheld a municipality’s involuntary annexation of property in Husky Trans, Inc. v. Village of Barrington Hills.

After the village board discussed the possible annexation of two unincorporated parcels of land, it sent notice to the owner that the village board would consider annexing the parcels at a board meeting. The notice also informed the owner that the property would be rezoned to the R1 single family residential zoning district upon annexation. The owner’s attorney sent a response to the village that the owner objected to the forcible annexation, arguing that the parcels did not qualify for annexation under section 7-1-13 of the Illinois Municipal Code because the parcels were not “wholly bounded” by one or more municipalities, forest preserve, or park district property.

Read more here.

Related: “Village Board of Trustees meets tonight,” “Two items of interest on Monday’s Board of Trustees meeting agenda,” “Village posts Annexation Notice,” “Change.org petition posted: ‘Why Barrington Hills should not annex Sutton and the Penny Road Properties.’

Read Full Post »

The Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Items on their agenda include:

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

*Commercial development planned off Ridge Road in unincorporated McHenry County

Related:Barrington luxury home proposal draws criticism from plan commissioners, residents, park district,” “Barrington Plan Commission Public Hearing tomorrow night regarding planned 88 single-family residential homes at former PepsiCo site,” “Barrington posts further information on proposed Claremont development,” “Barrington posts Public Hearing notice regarding proposed 88 home development at former PepsiCo site,” “88 custom home development planned for former PepsiCo Research & Development Center property in Barrington

Read Full Post »

The Barrington Hills Park District Board/Riding Club of Barrington Hills will hold their monthly meeting this evening in person and via Zoom at 7:00 PM. Some topics on their agenda include:

  • Plum Farms proposal
  • Riding Center Advisory Committee Report
  • Administrator Report

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here. Instructions for accessing the meeting remotely can be found here.

Read Full Post »

Area N (Click in image to enlarge)

“I want to thank everyone who showed up at the Plan Commission meeting and who voiced their concerns. We have strived throughout this process to be as open and fair as possible. We have held numerous hearings on the matter and have strived to treat everyone in attendance at these meetings with dignity and respect, while ensuring the voices of our residents are heard. Our goal has always been to follow the law and protect the interests of our community.

However, we found out about legal action the church appears to be taking to disconnect the property from the Village of South Barrington through a newspaper ad, and we did not receive any direct notification prior to the ad running. This is very disappointing, especially since the ad ran the same day as the Plan Commission meeting.

I also want to clarify the zoning process. We are obligated to consider all zoning requests and to treat all requests without prejudice.

The primary functions of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals start with a request from a Petitioner and then a referral by the Board of Trustees. Specifically, the Commission is charged with:

  • Comprehensive Planning – developing comprehensive plans for land use, new developments, infrastructure, and growth management
  • Zoning Ordinance Recommendations – making recommendations for any changes to zoning ordinances
  • Subdivision oversight – reviewing subdivision plats to ensure they meet local regulations and promote orderly development.
  • Public Hearings – holding public hearings on matters related to zoning, development, and comprehensive planning
  • Review of Special Use Permits and Variances – providing recommendations to the governing body based on local standards and the comprehensive plan

Our goal has always been to carry out these duties in an honest and transparent manner. We are committed to reaching a resolution to the issues surrounding the Area N property. To that end, we will be having another hearing at 7 pm at Village Hall on Oct. 23rd to continue the discussion on Area N. I invite all concerned residents to attend this important meeting.”

Paula McCombie
Mayor

Read Full Post »

The Barrington Hills Park District/Riding Club of Barrington Hills will be holding an Efficiency Act Meeting beginning at  6:00 PM followed by the Park Board Meeting (though only one agenda is posted?). Some topics on their agenda include:

  • Efficiency Report Review (not posted)
  • Approval of the September 2024 Park Board Meeting Minutes (not posted)
  • Approval of the September 2024 Park District Financials (not posted)
  • Advisory Committee Report (not posted)
  • Winter Indoor Riding Schedule (not posted)
  • Security Considerations for the Riding Center, IAPD Grant (not posted)
  • Project Requests* (not posted)
  • Administrator’s Report (you guessed it, not posted)

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here. Instructions for accessing the meeting remotely can be found here.

* “The Barrington Hills Park District is taking requests

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »