Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Elections’ Category

Republican State Sen. Darby Hills is being challenged by State Rep. Nabeela Syed, a Democrat, for the 26th Senate District seat representing northwest suburbs in the Nov. 3 general election.

By Brett Chase | Chicago Sun*Times

A pair of suburban races for Springfield lawmakers are competitive fights heading into the Nov. 3 election, even as many incumbent politicians across the state are running unopposed.

Among the races to watch, Rep. Nabeela Syed, a Democrat from Inverness, is challenging incumbent Republican Darby Hills of Barrington Hills, who was appointed to the 26th District state Senate seat in early 2025. The northwest suburban district includes parts of Cook, Lake, McHenry and Kane counties.

The Illinois Democratic Party is spending heavily to help Syed with her campaign. In September alone, the party and a committee led by Illinois Senate President Don Harmon — with the aim of bolstering Democrats’ majority — contributed almost $1 million to Syed, records show.

Hills, a former prosecutor and 2021 Mrs. Illinois America, was a Barrington Hills trustee before being appointed to McConchie’s seat. She has campaigned for public safety, especially related to children, lower taxes and controls on spending.

“Illinois doesn’t have a revenue problem,” Hills says, “it has a spending problem.”

Republican Party-political committees contributed more than $80,000 to Hills in September after giving her more than $300,000 in August, according to state campaign disclosure reports.

Report continues here.

Read Full Post »

By Mick Zawislak | Daily Herald

Another unified voice has surfaced in opposition to a question on the Nov. 3 ballot asking voters whether Lake County should be allowed to impose up to a 1% sales tax for school facilities.

Last week, the Barrington Area Council of Governments announced its eight-member entities, comprising seven villages and Barrington Township, unanimously opposed the proposal due to widespread rising costs already faced by residents.

“This one caught the attention of our mayors because they were hearing from their constituents,” said Kimberly Saunders, executive director of the organization focused in southwestern Lake County.

“Everything is more expensive and it’s a difficult time for folks,” she added.

About two weeks ago, the Lake County Republican Central Committee launched a campaign against the measure citing similar concerns. Volunteers have been knocking on doors and distributing information in all 18 townships and will be receiving yard signs soon.

At issue is the County School Facilities Sales Tax created by state law in 2007 as an alternative revenue source to local property taxes. If approved by voters, the county can impose a sales tax of up to 1% to be used exclusively for specific school-related uses.

Those include facilities and site work, such as additions or renovations; infrastructure or safety/security upgrades; school resource officers or mental health professionals; and, managing debt by paying off existing bonds or abating property taxes.

Article continues here.

Related: “BACOG issues position statement on the November Lake County School Facilities Tax referendum”

Read Full Post »

By Bryce Hill | Illinois Policy Institute

An advisory referendum on the Nov. 3 general election ballot will gauge Cook County voters’ support for a statewide income tax increase on millionaires.

The results are non-binding, so the vote will not trigger any policy change.

Cook County voters will be asked:

“Shall Illinois adopt the Millionaire Amendment for Property Tax Relief and Education, which would enact a 3% income tax surcharge only on millionaires and use 50% of this new revenue to provide property tax relief for residential and commercial taxpayers and 50% to improve state funding for public education?”

The ballot language is similar to a constitutional amendment that failed in the Illinois House earlier this year and a previous statewide ballot question from 2024. However, notably absent from the Cook County ballot question is language that specifies the additional 3% income tax would be only on income above $1 million rather than on all income for a taxpayer whose income tops $1 million. A 2019 proposal from Gov. J.B. Pritzker was widely criticized because it would have raised the state income tax to 7.95% from 4.95% on all income of a taxpayer whose income topped $1 million.

Proponents of the push to scrap Illinois’ constitutionally protected flat income tax say the increased revenue would provide property tax relief. However, previous analysis of the proposal and Illinois’ state finances shows the massive tax hike would come up more than $2 billion short of being able to provide Illinoisans with any such relief.

That’s because the state projects future budget shortfalls in excess of $3.8 billion, and the current pension funding plan shorts contributions by more than $5 billion, according to the plan’s own actuaries.

Report continues here.

Read Full Post »

Image courtesy 10.14.26 Barrington 220 School District Facebook post

A follow-up to “A Polling Place for Some”

The law requires certain actions before any early voting site can operate, including official lists that are supposed to show the public where and when it can vote. Barrington High School isn’t on any of them.

What the law requires

Illinois’ early voting statute, 10 ILCS 5/19A-25, is short and clear. The election authority, here the Cook County Clerk, must:

  • publish, in a newspaper of general circulation, during the week before early voting and at least once a week during it, a schedule listing every permanent and temporary early voting location and the dates and hours of each (subsection (a));
  • post that schedule at every early voting location, starting no later than 10 days before early voting begins (subsection (b));
  • make free copies of the schedule available to the public (subsection (c));
  • put the schedule on its website (subsection (d)); and
  • give the State Board of Elections a list of all early voting sites and their hours at least 10 days before early voting begins (subsection (f)).

Subsection (e) covers sites added after the schedule is published:

“Additional temporary locations may be established after the schedule is published, provided that the location is open to all eligible voters. The location, dates, and hours shall be reported to the State Board of Elections and posted on the election authority’s website.”

Open to all eligible voters, reported to the State Board, and posted on the Clerk’s website. From what we’ve been able to determine, Barrington High’s site fails each of these on the public record.

Not on the Clerk’s website

The Cook County Clerk’s Early Voting Locations page on October 15, 2026, the day after the District announced the BHS voting site, says limited early voting for the November 3 election began October 7 at six Vote Centers, and that expanded early voting begins October 19 at 56 suburban locations. The page lists courthouses, village halls, libraries, community centers, and a few college and school campuses, all open to the public. It does not list Barrington High School, and it does not mention a high school early voting day. https://www.cookcountyclerkil.gov/elections/ways-to-vote/early-voting/early-voting-locations

The District posted on October 14 that BHS hosted the site “today.” On that date, according to the Clerk’s own page, early voting in suburban Cook County was limited to six sites: the Clerk’s downtown office and the courthouses in Rolling Meadows, Skokie, Maywood, Bridgeview, and Markham. The nearest public site for a Barrington voter was the Rolling Meadows courthouse. The site at BHS appears nowhere on the public schedule.

Not on the State Board of Elections’ list

Similarly, Barrington High School is not on the State Board of Elections’ list of 2026 General Election early voting locations for Cook County, which is built from what election authorities report under subsections (e) and (f). The only Barrington-area entry is Barrington Hills Village Hall, 112 Algonquin Road, which doesn’t open until October 19. https://www.elections.il.gov/votingandregistrationsystems/earlyvotinglocationssearch.aspx

Not open to all eligible voters

By the District’s own description, the site was for “eligible BHS students and staff who are Cook County voters.” A Cook County retiree living down the street from the school, a veteran, a parent: none of them were invited, and none of them could have known to come, because the BHS site wasn’t on any schedule. That is the opposite of “open to all eligible voters.”

The Clerk’s own training materials make the same point. The 2026 High School Early Voting Handbook, which the Clerk’s Office prepared for the student election judges, opens by stating the general rule: “A suburban Cook County registered voter can vote early at any of the suburban Cook County Early Voting sites.” Nothing in the Handbook says a high school site may be limited to the school’s own students and staff.

And, the Handbook is no rulebook for this fall’s General Election sites. Its cover reads “2026 Gubernatorial Primary Election,” and its calendar lists a “Primary High School Early Voting Day” of February 26, 2026, but no high school voting day for the November 3 General Election. As far as the public record shows, the high school sites that operated this October were run without any published procedures specific to them. https://www.cookcountyclerkil.gov/sites/default/files/pdfs/hs-ev-handbook-2026.pdf

Image courtesy 10.14.26 Barrington 220 School District Facebook post

What about pollwatchers?

In fairness, the Handbook doesn’t bar pollwatchers. However, the Handbook never mentions a fall high school voting day.  The Handbook advises judges that credentialed pollwatchers, media and exit pollsters may enter the site for the Primary Election. And, in fact, the media seems to have been made aware of the polling as there is coverage from CBS on Cook County “transform(ing) 27 suburban high schools into early voting sites for a ‘Teen Takeover for Democracy’ event … transform(ing) high schools into early voting sites to help eligible students vote.” https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/cook-county-high-schools-early-voting-students/

But a right to observe means little if no one (except CBS) knows where or when to show up. A pollwatcher’s credential has to name the specific early voting site. If a site isn’t on the Clerk’s schedule, isn’t on the State Board’s list, and is announced by the school district only on the day it happens, no party, candidate, or civic group can realistically get a credential for it and get through the door of a secured school building. The Handbook says nothing about how an outside pollwatcher is supposed to get into a high school during the school day.

Questions the Clerk should answer

We’re not mind readers, and there may be an explanation. If so, the Clerk’s Office should give it publicly:

  • Under what legal authority did the BHS site operate, and was it treated as an early voting location under Article 19A?
  • If it was a temporary location, why isn’t it on the Clerk’s website or the State Board’s list, as subsection (e) requires?
  • Was it ever included in the published newspaper schedule or posted at the site, as subsections (a) and (b) require?
  • Was it open to any eligible Cook County voter who showed up? If not, how is that consistent with “open to all eligible voters”?
  • Which other high schools hosted sites this fall, on what dates, and how many ballots were cast at each?
  • What is the Chicago Bears’ role in the “Defenders of DA’mocracy” program, and will the Clerk release the agreement?

These aren’t partisan questions. The notice rules in 19A-25 protect every voter and every campaign equally. They exist so that no one, whether the Clerk, a school district, or anyone else, can set up a polling place that only the privileged few know about.

Perhaps a Freedom of Information Act request to District 220 and the Cook County Clerk’s Office for the published early voting schedules and newspaper notices, the reports to the State Board of Elections, the list of high school sites and dates for this election, and any agreement with the Chicago Bears would provide some insight.

Related: “A Polling Place for Some: Barrington High School’s Invitation-Only Early Voting”

Read Full Post »

This week, Barrington High School hosted an early voting site for the General Election, run with the Cook County Clerk’s Office. According to District 220’s own announcement, the site was for eligible BHS students and staff, and students served as election judges. Everyone else, including the veteran down the street, the retiree on a fixed schedule, and the parent who pays the taxes that run the building, was not invited.

This isn’t a one-off. It’s part of the Clerk’s “Defenders of DA’mocracy” program. In the spring primary, 24 suburban high schools became fully functioning voting sites. On a single day, those school sites recorded 1,136 ballots, more than the 1,021 cast during the first seven days at the regular countywide locations. The Clerk calls that success. I call it a government office choosing which voters get a polling place brought to their door.

Brought to you by the “Chicago Bears?”

The program’s name isn’t a typo. “DA’mocracy” is a nod to “Da Bears,” because the Clerk’s Office developed the program in partnership with the Chicago Bears. Yes, a professional football franchise is a named partner in a program that runs official polling places inside public schools.

The public announcements don’t answer the questions any taxpayer should ask. What does the Bears’ role actually involve? Is the team providing money, materials, staff, or promotion? Is there a written agreement, and who signed it? Does the team have any say in which schools are chosen? Is anyone else sponsoring election administration in Cook County?

A private organization, especially one that is lobbying local and state governments for stadium deals and public money, has no business being involved in how elections are run unless every term of that relationship is public. “Partnership” is a word that hides more than it explains. The Clerk’s Office should release the agreement and any related communications, and if it won’t, voters should ask why.

Shut out of their own school

District 220 spans four counties: Cook, Lake, McHenry, and Kane. Barrington High School is its only high school. Because the site was run by the Cook County Clerk, only Cook County voters could use it. Students and staff who live in Lake, McHenry, or Kane County, along with all of the district’s taxpayers in those three counties, were shut out of a polling place set up in their own school.

Some voters are more equal than others

Defenders will point out that Illinois already provides on-site voting for residents of nursing homes and veterans’ facilities. That’s true, but it isn’t the same thing. That process is limited to physically incapacitated voters who apply in advance, and it’s run as supervised vote-by-mail on one of the few days just before the election. Nobody is setting up a full early voting site in the VFW hall or the senior center, staffed by its members, open on a weekday for that community alone. If convenience-based, community-specific polling places are good policy, why do only high schools get them? It’s fair to ask whether the expected voting patterns of each group have anything to do with it.

Who is watching?

Illinois law is clear that pollwatchers may be appointed to observe early voting at each permanent and temporary polling place where early voting is conducted. If credentialed pollwatchers from candidates, parties, or civic organizations were turned away or never given a realistic chance to attend, the public deserves an explanation. A polling place inside a school building, during school hours, surrounded by the school’s own staff, needs more transparency than usual, not less.

Equal treatment, full disclosure

None of this is about whether young people should vote. They should. It’s about equal treatment and open government. If the Clerk wants to bring the ballot box to a community, every community should be eligible, observers should have the access the law guarantees, and the public should be able to see exactly who is partnering with the office that runs our elections. Until then, voters are right to ask whether “civic engagement” means engaging the voters the system prefers, and whose interests are being served in the process.

Image Source: Barrington 220 School District Facebook Post

Read Full Post »

Republican state Rep. Martin McLaughlin of Barrington Hills spoke out in February against Gov. JB Pritzker’s plan to reduce local control of residential zoning rules in a news conference in South Barrington. Flanking him were Algonquin Village President Debby Sosine, left, and South Barrington Mayor Paula McCombie. | Brian Hill/bhill@dailyherald.com

Daily Herald Editorial Board

In District 52, incumbent Republican Martin McLaughlin brings a lengthy Springfield record focused on fiscal responsibility. We endorsed him in 2020 for his energy and resourcefulness, in 2022 for his measured approach to state government and in 2024 as a steadfast voice for controlled spending. Democratic challenger Maria Peterson emphasizes lower costs for working families, affordable housing, gun-violence prevention, health care and tax changes. While Peterson is a strong candidate, McLaughlin’s experience and focus on fiscal restraint and oversight continue to make him the stronger choice. McLaughlin is endorsed.

Endorsement can be seen here.

Related: “Editorial: Martin McLaughlin for Illinois 52nd House District” – Chicago Tribune

Read Full Post »

The Barrington Hills Park District Board/Riding Club of Barrington Hills will hold their monthly meeting this evening in person and via Zoom at 6:00 PM. Some topics on their agenda include:

  • Discussion of equine emergency stabling
  • Discussion of Treasurer’s overview
  • Grant Applications

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here. Instructions for accessing the meeting remotely can be found here.

Read Full Post »

By Steve Zalusky | Daily Herald

In the wake of four (4) school board members coming under investigation, Barrington Area Unit School District 220 has updated a key policy governing political activity by elected officials.

The update, approved by board members last week, allows board members seeking elected office to mention District 220 or use incidental photos of district property in campaign materials, but only as long as they don’t suggest a district endorsement.

“Not to say that the prior policy wasn’t great, but this, I think, clarifies a lot of things,” board member Steve Wang said.

The policy update comes after board member Erin Chan Ding was found to have violated district policies by using school resources, property and social media for prohibited political campaign activities related to her campaign for the Illinois House.

Fellow board members Leah Collister-Lazzari and Barry Altshuler also violated policies by posting images of students, district property and the district’s chess piece logo on campaign social media sites during their 2023 runs for school board.

School board President Sandra Ficke-Bradford was investigated and cleared of wrongdoing regarding a photo of her in front of Barrington High School that appeared in a news article related to the 2025 election.

The board next will be examining its ethics and gift ban policies, officials said

Report continues here.

Related: ““District 220 board members violated campaign policies, investigation finds,” “Proposed Policy Change Would Strip Anonymous Formal Grievances in Barrington District 220,” “CUSD 220 Board delivers second (slappier) slap on the wrist to member Erin Chan Ding,” “CUSD 220 Board of Education public comments we applaud,” “Over $100,000 in Special Interest Funding gifted to 220 Board member’s campaign in failed bid for State Rep job,” “New Evidence of Chan Ding’s Policy Violations and Conflicts of Interest,” “The D220 Board of Ed gets another ‘F’ in accountability & transparency,” “The Real Issue in Barrington 220 Isn’t Parking or Levies — It’s Leadership Culture,” “BOARD OF ED VOTES, MEMBER CHAN DING MADE FLAGRANT POLICY VIOLATIONS – Part 2,” “BOARD OF ED VOTES, MEMBER CHAN DING MADE FLAGRANT POLICY VIOLATIONS,” “District 220’s Lack of Transparency (Updated),” “District 220’s Lack of Transparency” and “Change.org Petition: ‘For the Resignation of Erin Chan Ding ~ D220 Resources are Not for Political Campaigns’”

 

Read Full Post »

Martin McLaughlin is a Republican running to represent Illinois’ 52nd House District. (George Papadakis)

By The Editorial Board | Chicago Tribune

Republican state Rep. Martin “Marty” McLaughlin barely survived his last election, defeating Democrat Maria Peterson by just 47 votes in 2024. The two are facing off again in this northwest suburban district.

McLaughlin, 61, an investment manager and former Barrington Hills village president, has been a consistent voice for fiscal restraint in Springfield. He identifies property taxes as the district’s most pressing problem and has helped residents navigate the appeals process. “If government is going to keep raising the bill, taxpayers at least deserve to know how to fight an unfair assessment,” he told us.

McLaughlin’s fiscal conservatism is important in a state that desperately needs greater discipline in that area.

Martin McLaughlin is endorsed.

Read the full editorial endorsement here.

Editorial note: Representative McLaughlin is also endorsed by:

  • Eleanor Sweet McDonnell, Mayor, North Barrington*
  • Paula McCombie, Village President, South Barrington*
  • Karen Darch, Former Mayor, Barrington*
  • Andrew Burke, Mayor, Lake Barrington*
  • Kevin Richardson, Former Mayor, Lake Barrington*
  • Keith Vogeler, Mayor, Port Barrington
  • Jeff Sode, Mayor, Wauconda
  • Debby Sosine, Village President, Algonquin
  • Ray Bogdanowski, Village President, Lake in the Hills
  • Donna Johnson, Mayor, Libertyville
  • Richard McLaughlin, Mayor, Island Lake
  • Steve Henley, Mayor, Volo

It’s important to note McLaughlin’s campaign rival lives in North Barrington yet she could not garner an endorsement for this or her prior campaigns.

*Present and former members of the Barrington Area Council Of Governments (BACOG).

 

Read Full Post »

By Sarah Roderick-Fitch | The Center Square

A majority of American voters are concerned with socialist candidates running and possibly winning political office, according to a new poll.

The Center Square Voters’ Voice poll found that 55% of American voters are concerned about Democratic Socialist candidates running for and winning elected office in the U.S., while 37% aren’t concerned.

A slew of candidates running as democratic socialists appears to be raising alarms with a majority of American voters.

Of the 55% who are concerned, 35% are very concerned, while 20% say they are “somewhat concerned.”

(Click on image to enlarge)

Of those not concerned, only 17% say they are not too concerned, while 20% say they are not at all concerned.

The poll comes as several Democratic Socialist candidates have risen in popularity across the country. The Democratic Socialists of America are touting 67 wins across the country, with 93 running. However, the group includes 62 DSA candidates who have lost.

Report continues here.

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »