Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘OP/Ed’ Category

Juliana Stratton (left)

By Mark Glennon | Wirepoints

The balance in the United States Senate after November’s elections is likely to be razor thin, making each Senator’s competence critical in what is among the most dangerous periods America has faced, both internationally and nationally.

Juliana Stratton wants a promotion to the Senate from lieutenant governor — a mostly ceremonial post in Illinois. She’s asking for that promotion from behind a curtain, denying voters any opportunity to see whether she has even a meager understanding of the issues she will face.

Multiple debates and forums would be the best means to learn about Stratton — as well as about Don Tracy, her Republican opponent, whose Senate credentials are also little known to Illinois voters. Tracy accepted offers to no fewer than seven such events from CBS2 Chicago, FOX 32 Chicago, the League of Women Voters of Peoria, the Illinois Farm Bureau, the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, the Technology and Manufacturing Association and the Illinois Municipal League.

Stratton, however, refused all but one , and it will be very late, set for October 20. Early voting starts September 24 in Illinois, nearly a month before that. And with Chicago’s PBS affiliate, WTTW, being the moderator, we should expect no tough questions for Stratton.

How about a long interview by a fair reporter versed on national issues?

Forget it. You will find none. For that matter, you won’t find one on any matter for the entire duration of her political career in Illinois. When asked for an interview in July by one source that can be reasonably expected to ask hard questions, The Center Square, Stratton declined. Tracy, in contrast, has given multiple interviews to sources both left- and right-leaning.

In fairness, Stratton did participate in multiple debates and forums when running in the Democratic primary. However, that was against fellow progressive Democrats who largely agreed with her and she was never challenged on the major issues that divide the country and would be important to undecided and swing voters.

What do we know about Stratton, aside from her record of complete allegiance to Gov. JB Pritzker on Illinois issues?

On her web pages and elsewhere you can find the standard list of the far left’s policy positions. They include abolishing ICE, which she says is unfixable; a national $25 per hour minimum wage, even in rural areas; Medicare for all, with no cost analysis provided; and ending the 51-year old Senate filibuster rule.

Her top priority, however, is fighting back against President Trump, she has emphasized. We might therefore expect some substance in her views about Trump, right?

Her most notable words about Trump were in an ad that did get her national and international attention, but it was ridiculed for its vacuous crudeness, even by left-leaning sources like Britain’s The Guardian. It was a 30-second ad in her primary race with a string of “F— Trump.”

Article continues here.

Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints.

Read Full Post »

By Adam Michel | New York Post

It started in New York, but now democratic socialism is on a winning streak around the country.

Months after Zohran Mamdani became mayor, candidates backed by the Democratic Socialists of America nearly swept the city’s June Democratic primaries.

In Florida, DSA member Angie Nixon won the Democratic Senate nomination over the establishment favorite.

And it’s not just the DSA’s own candidates: Socialist ideas are being laundered into the mainstream Democratic Party.

In the upper Midwest, Abdul El-Sayed and Peggy Flanagan rode Sen. Bernie Sanders’ endorsement to win Democratic Senate primaries, campaigning on Medicare for All and expansive Green New Deal-like policies.

So I took the DSA platform — dubbed “A Day Without Capitalism,” it’s long on rhetoric and thin on details — and tallied up the costs.

The bottom line: The DSA wants somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion in new spending over the next decade.

Continue reading here.

Read Full Post »

Spirit Airlines data has never been more valuable | Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune

By The Editorial Board | Chicago Tribune

If you recently left a job, it’s likely you lost access to your old inbox and the saved records of those tedious Zoom or Teams meetings. Leaving such digital detritus behind now is part of life. But we doubt you anticipated your employer being able to make money from what you had to say while gainfully employed.

Consider what just happened with the remains of what used to be Spirit Airlines, the bankrupt ultra-low-cost air carrier. Earlier this month, Google was the winner of a highly competitive auction not for the dead airline’s planes or equipment but for the corpse’s data trove. Reportedly, the treasure included 100 million emails and 500 million Teams messages, not to mention a ton of lines of code.

Why did Google blow $10 million on such seeming scrap? To train its artificial intelligence agents.

We’ll try not to get too in the weeds here, but in essence the Spirit purchase was like buying a massive business-school case study with bots as the intended students.

By seeing what humans did in actual life, the AI creepy-crawlies can learn about, well, what humans did in actual life. It doesn’t matter if they did what they did well (and, in the case of Spirit, it all failed in the end). It’s all about using this specific business as a way for AI to learn how an airline actually operates in real life or, yet more generally, how humans typically work together in organizations.

And you thought those AI agents were merely ingesting books and newspapers. Nope. They are looking at your old out-of-office replies and ill-considered rants on Teams.

Read on here.

Read Full Post »

Argyle Lake State Park

By Wendy J. Paulson | Special to The State Journal-Register

Governor JB Pritzker has built one of the strongest climate action records in the country– and now has the chance to make it even stronger. Healthy, resilient nature is a key part of the equation, one that can drive more economic investment to the state.

A transformational appointment for the next Director of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) can extend his leadership through visionary investment in nature.

IDNR’s mission is to steward the state’s natural resources for the health of ecosystems and the well-being of residents. That extends beyond state parks and nature preserves to ensuring that all of Illinois’ lands and waters are healthy and beautiful.

People choose where to live based on quality of life. Nature plays a big role in that choice. Access to parks, trails, clean water, and vibrant natural areas is exactly what makes a place feel compelling.

It’s why families put down roots, why young professionals choose one city over another, and why retirees decide to stay. Businesses know this too. When they’re deciding where to locate and how to attract talent, they look for places their employees want to live. Investing in Illinois’ nature and open spaces isn’t just good for our ecosystems — it’s an investment in the very things that make people want to build their futures here.

As a former Chair of the Forest Preserves of Cook County’s Conservation and Policy Council, I saw firsthand how good leadership can nurture the land and the communities that depend on it. Deer Grove East Forest Preserve is one such success story. Once degraded agricultural land, it was restored back to thriving wetlands, woodlands, and prairie.

An economic analysis of the restoration work found that every dollar spent on restoration delivered an immediate $2 return from jobs and economic activity. In the long term, it delivered a whopping $6 return from flood control, water quality benefits, and recreational activity. Today, Deer Grove is one of the most visited public open spaces in Cook County. At the scale of the state, the health and economic benefits of this type of conservation are indisputable- and within reach.

Cook County voters understand this and responded in 2022 by passing, with an overwhelming majority, a ballot measure that increases investment in nature by $45 million a year. The five collar counties followed suit in 2024, generating over a billion dollars over the next twenty years for nature.

That kind of success shows just how much appetite there is for this work. The moment is ripe to bring it to scale statewide, so all Illinoisans can benefit from access to nature.

There’s real headroom here. Illinois has lost more than 99% of the state’s original prairie and over 85% of its historic wetlands, and ranks 49th in the nation in protected natural areas per capita – which means many of our natural habitats remain fragmented.

As climate change reshapes ecosystems across the country, Illinois has the chance to step up and play a leading role.  A transformational leader at IDNR could turn the page for Illinois public lands, tackling the state parks capital backlog and reconnecting natural habitats.

We love the Prairie State. Governor Pritzker loves it too. A transformational appointment for the IDNR is his opportunity to write the next chapter of that legacy.

Wendy J. Paulson is executive chairman of the Bobolink Foundation and served as past chairman of The Nature Conservancy of Illinois and past chairman of The Conservation & Policy Council of Cook County. She lives in Barrington, IL. 

This article originally appeared on State Journal-Register: Why Pritzker needs a transformational appointment for IDNR | Opinion

Source

Read Full Post »

Tall electrical towers follow a north-south pathway through Barrington Hills in 2023. | Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune

By The Editorial Board | Chicago Tribune

Electric bills are a sore spot with consumers and for good reason.

They would be set to go quite a bit higher in the next few years but for an artificial cap the regional power-grid manager serving Commonwealth Edison’s territory and all or parts of 12 other states has imposed on the price paid to power generators for promising to deliver when most needed. That cost, reflected in the electric bills all of us pay, is established via an auction held ahead of time by PJM Interconnection, operator of this regional grid that includes northern Illinois.

PJM (one of several U.S. regional grid overseers that reports to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) ran its auction just last month for the delivery year beginning June 1, 2028, and ending May 31, 2029. And the results delivered a stark — but largely unnoticed — warning for the Chicago area.

The cost of “capacity” in the period was capped at $325 per megawatt-day, about the same as ratepayers are charged now. But, based on the bids PJM got from generators and other providers, if there had been no price cap, the capacity charge just in the ComEd territory would have been more than double at nearly $777 per megawatt-day, far higher than any such price ever recorded by PJM.

In every other part of the PJM footprint, which runs east from here to the mid-Atlantic, the cost would have been higher without a cap as well. But it “only” would have been about $555 per megawatt-day.

If that price in the ComEd territory had been allowed to stand, monthly electric bills for residents of single-family homes would be increasing $35 to $77 beginning in mid-2028 for that reason alone, according to ComEd. Those in apartments would be paying $17 to $38 more.

You may be wondering why you should care if regulators and politicians have worked to keep such disastrous outcomes from occurring. The reason, as we’ll explain further below, is that price controls of this sort reduce supply and risk future shortages. In other words, which is worse? Nosebleed electricity prices or rolling blackouts when temperatures soar?

That said, why is northern Illinois such an outlier? PJM didn’t say in their auction release. But Joseph Bowring, the independent market monitor for the PJM region (he serves as sort of a referee for the market, assessing bidder behavior and other things), wasn’t so reticent. He told RTO Insider, a trade publication, that the state’s clean-energy law, the 2021 Climate & Equitable Jobs Act, is responsible.

Editorial continues here.

Read Full Post »

Democratic candidates Juliana Stratton and Maria Peterson | Photo courtesy Maria Peterson’s Facebook page

By The Editorial Board | Chicago Tribune

Who doesn’t love a good wish list? Come dream with us right here.

First step, we abolish capitalism. Without that most ultimate of evils? No more bills. No more debt. We’re all carefree now.

That’s the basic premise of the Democratic Socialists of America’s vision. If you haven’t looked at the platform lately, we offer you the following condensed version.

In addition to abolishing capitalism (step one), the DSA proposes eliminating the Senate and the Electoral College, subordinating the presidency and Supreme Court to Congress, and placing major industries under public ownership.

Housing, health care and energy all become public goods.

Oh, and we don’t need defense or public safety, so we can defund the Pentagon and get rid of prisons. The lamb will live among the wolves and will not be bitten.

While it’s tempting to dismiss all of the above as fringe politics, that might be a dangerously cavalier approach for sensible Democrats. The DSA’s influence has grown inside the Democratic Party, and both Chicago and New York, no small burgs, are governed by mayors who openly identify with the movement.

Editorial continues here.

Read Full Post »

By Scott Stantis | The Baltimore Sun

Related:Editorial: Graham Platner’s implosion should be a dire warning to Democrats. Is the party listening?

Read Full Post »

Lawmakers work in the Missouri House chamber on April 21, 2026, in Jefferson City, Missouri. Missouri is asking voters whether to gradually eliminate its income tax and shift more toward taxing consumption. (David A. Lieb/AP)

Missouri, Iowa, Indiana and Wisconsin all are thinking creatively about taxes

By The Editorial Board | Chicago Tribune

Illinoisans often assume high taxes are simply the unavoidable cost of living in the Land of Lincoln. But just across our borders, states are making some very different choices.

Missouri is asking voters whether to gradually eliminate its income tax and shift more toward taxing consumption. Indiana continues to emphasize fiscal restraint and has approved further tax reductions. Wisconsin used part of a multibillion-dollar surplus to enact income tax cuts and has continued debating additional relief. Iowa phased out its graduated individual income tax in favor of a flat rate of 3.8%.

Maybe you think Missouri is making a mistake or Iowa has gone too far. Maybe Wisconsin will reverse course. That’s not our point here. What stands out for us is that our Midwestern neighbors are at least practicing some creative taxation thinking.

Take what is going on in Missouri. On Aug. 4, voters get the chance to weigh in on whether Missouri should fundamentally rethink how it taxes its citizens; specifically whether the Show-Me State should gradually shift its tax burden away from income and toward consumption.

Ironically, Missouri currently has the very tax structure Illinois progressives have long sought: a graduated income tax. Even so, its top marginal income tax rate (4.7%) is lower than Illinois’ flat rate (4.95%).

Missouri’s average combined state and local sales tax rate also remains far below the rate in Illinois. Approval of the amendment could eventually narrow that gap, depending on how lawmakers implement the shift. Even then, Missouri would have a long way to go to match Chicago’s 10.25%.

Article continues here.

Related:(Meanwhile) Income tax CUT on Missouri ballot; Illinois may see more outmigration

Read Full Post »

Mayor Brandon Johnson points to where he signed his name and wrote “The greatest frickin’ city in the world!” at a ceremonial beam-signing event at the construction site of the new Concourse D project at O’Hare International Airport on April 23, 2026. | Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune

By The Editorial Board | Chicago Tribune

We met recently with Robert Isom, the chief executive officer of American Airlines Group. Isom was in Chicago to reinforce his airline’s newly expanded commitment to Chicago, as writ large by the coming return of his airline’s nonstop flight from Chicago’s O’Hare airport to Tokyo Narita, a vital dual-hub addition to our city’s international connectivity that had been gone for seven years.

Isom told us he had met with some of the city’s business and political leaders and had many productive conversations. When we asked him what his airline needed from Chicago, he answered, in essence, that it was crucial the city remain a major business center. There will be connecting passengers at either end of that Tokyo flight, of course, but connections can be made at several hubs, many of which have cheaper landing fees than Chicago. Isom was making the point that the route needed substantial hometown demand, too. And that was dependent on the health of business in Chicago.

An American Airlines jet taxis at O’Hare International Airport on April 23, 2026. | Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune

That upbeat meeting was in our heads when we read this truly unfathomable statement by Mayor Brandon Johnson, from a recent press conference:

“The progressive movement is alive and well. We just have a few obstinate individuals that are more aligned with the interests of corporations that are ultimately stalling what could be a full-out revolution in this city, and the people of Chicago want it.”

We suspect we’re on the list of Johnson’s “few obstinate individuals,” along with assorted aldermen who do not enjoy mayoral favor, and we take pride in that. And, for the record, we agree with the mayor that the progressive movement is alive and well. Look no further than New York City to confirm that claim.

But Johnson didn’t stop there: He simply cannot stop trashing a business community that is trying like heck to promote growth and public safety even as City Hall insists on demonizing its honorable intentions.

Editorial continues here.

Read Full Post »

 

The document reflects a sacrifice that its 56 signers chose to make.

By Matt Paprocki | Illinois Policy Institute President and CEO

Unexpectedly, I heard myself say, “I would sign that document. I hope you’ll join me.”

A few months ago, I was with my family in Washington, D.C., standing in a dark room in the National Archives, looking at the Declaration of Independence.

I told my kids about the sacrifice that each of those men, and their families, made when they signed that document.

My then 8-year-old daughter, Fiona, asked me,

“Dad, would you have signed that document?”

“Of course I would,” I thought. Every American would, because we know how this movie ends.

For those 56 signers, the question wasn’t easy. They were standing up against the most powerful army in the world — for an experiment in self-government.

Declaring independence was risky. They were risking their fortunes. They were risking their honor. They were risking their lives. And they were putting their families at risk as well.

As I looked down at the names on the Declaration, I realized these were more than just signatures from 250 years ago. The signers were husbands and fathers. They were business owners and farmers.

They were us.

Looking at the document, I realized the Declaration of Independence isn’t just a historical document. Every generation is asked the same question the signers were asked 250 years ago.

Would we sign the document?

Commentary continues here.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »