Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘The Chicago Way’ Category


A U-Haul moving truck outside Wrigley Field in Chicago | U-Haul

By Kevin Bessler | The Center Square

A moving and storage company has released its annual migration trends data, which measures one-way customer moves through the U.S. in 2024, and once again Illinois is near the bottom.

U-Haul growth states are ranked by their net gain or loss of U-Haul customers over the past year. The report gauges how well states and cities are attracting and maintaining residents, with Illinois coming in 45th place. Illinois’ place on the list grew three spots from No. 48 in the 2023 report.

Texas District Vice President Matt Merrill said he sees a steady flow of Illinoisans into the Lone State State, which ranked second in the nation in the report.

“Nationally, we see a lot of customers moving out of our Blue states coming down to the south to the Red states,” said Merrill. “A lot of that has to do with pro-business and less government control. In Texas specifically, we see a lot of customers moving here from Illinois and the Chicago market.”


In video provided by U-Haul, District vice presidents Matt Merrill and Jason Hardin discuss trends in moving data from the companies report for 2024. | U-Haul

Merrill adds that the housing market is still very affordable in Texas. Illinoisans continue to pay the second-highest property taxes in the country.

District VP Jason Hardin said there is a reason South Carolina and North Carolina both ranked in the top three.

“They’re moving here because of jobs,” said Hardin. “We have a lot of tech coming in, manufacturing, such as Boeing, Volvo, BMW.”

Meanwhile, Illinois’ unemployment rate, at 5.3%, is one of the highest in the country.

More, including the link to the video, here.

Read Full Post »

“This is the biggest scandal in America. And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking.” 

-Scott Jennings, CNN

By: Mark Glennon*

National stories abound this week about the concerted effort by media, the White House and Democratic officials lying to cover up Pres. Biden’s impaired mental capacity. Much of the commentary was sparked by a detailed Wall Street Journal report based on fifty interviews of people in or close to the White House. You can read it  here and see that Jennings’ comment above is no exaggeration. The coverup was there from the start, even while Biden was Obama’s vice president.

High among the guilty is one who remained steadfast and outspoken throughout Biden’s term in denying Biden’s impairment and claiming firsthand knowledge that Biden was fine. That’s Gov. JB Pritzker, who served as a Biden proxy during his candidacy.

Among comments Pritzker made:

“I’ve been with the President of the United States many times,” Pritzker said in February. “He is on the ball. The man knows more than most of us have forgotten.”

“Of course,” answered Pritzker when asked in July if Biden was “physically and mentally capable” of serving a second term.”

Pritzker resorted to smearing the special prosecutor who declined to prosecute Biden in part because of his mental condition, saying that a jury would see him as an “elderly man with a poor memory.” That was Robert Hur, an exceptionally well respected career prosecutor who reviewed the evidence and found that Biden had illegally taken possession of classified documents but was too frail to prosecute. “I smell a rat,” said Pritzker after Hur released his report, which included Hur’s conclusions about Biden’s conditions based on a deposition of Biden. “It was extremely unfair,” Pritzker said, for a Trump appointee, originally to the Department of Justice, to offer his own opinions about the mental acuity or age of the president of the United States.” In truth, there’s clearly nothing unfair about a prosecutor citing his reasons for believing that a jury would have found somebody too infirm to convict.

Pritzker even sought to make Biden’s age an asset, arguing that Biden had made age his “friend” and used his years to become “a gem of a human.” He went on: “I’ve thought a lot about why people care so much about age in this coming election, and I want to talk to you about it. We need to stop dismissing concerns about the physical age of a candidate, especially when that concern comes from a young person. Instead, what people are afraid of is the age of the candidates’ ideas,” he said.

Read more here.

*Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints.

Read Full Post »

Jackpot justice in Illinois recently drew the ire of two national groups. Cook County was labeled a leading “judicial hellhole.” Lawsuit abuse imposes a $4,281 cost on each Illinois household. State lawmakers, trial lawyers and plaintiff-friendly courts are to blame.

By Jerry Barmore | Illinois Policy Institute

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a judicial watchdog group in new reports have both slammed Illinois trial lawyers and the laws and courts that enable them.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform found Illinois tort costs come in at $4,281 per household. Tort payouts in Illinois totaled over $21 billion in 2022, equal to 2.1% of Illinois’ gross domestic product.

Costs rose by an average of 7.4% per year since 2016. The report noted the U.S. tort system racked up $529 billion in costs in 2022, with growth in tort costs since 2016 outpacing inflation at a rate of 7.1%.

Cook County ranked No. 6 in the U.S. on the list of judicial hellholes compiled by the American Tort Reform Foundation. In 2022, over 50,000 civil cases seeking over $50,000 were filed in Cook County Circuit Court. That was 91% of the big civil cases filed statewide that year – one case for every 94 residents compared to Illinois’ No. 2 county, DuPage, where there was one civil case per 15,608 residents.

Among the most notorious sources of recent tort litigation is Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. Under this law, an employer was held liable for collecting biometric identification from an employee, such as a fingerprint scan used to access a computer or clock in. As originally written, the law allowed damages for each instance without proving harm and threatened to bankrupt the White Castle fast food chain.

State lawmakers this year changed the law to allow for just one violation per individual. That significantly curtailed the damages that could be sought.

The group noted trial lawyers have been busy buying state lawmakers to keep the lawsuits flowing. The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association PAC put over $616,000 into state lawmakers’ campaigns during the 12 months ending in September, part of $11.8 million invested since 1994.

Read more here.

Related: “Report: Illinois home to 2nd worst judicial hellhole in the country

Read Full Post »

Illinois saw the third-highest rate of residents moving out in 2024 based on a survey by Atlas Van Lines. Jobs and taxes are among the top reasons people leave Illinois, which is also third in the nation for highest unemployment rate.

By Dylan Sharkey | Illinois Policy Institute

New numbers show more Illinoisans packed their bags for good in 2024.

Illinois is third in the nation for residents leaving by percentage, according to a survey by moving company Atlas Van Lines. Illinoisans packing up and finding a new state were 57% of total migration, the third-highest percentage behind California and Louisiana.

IRS data shows 56% of Illinoisans moving out make more than $100,000, the people with the greatest capacity to leave. And they also took $8.8 billion in income with them, too, usually to lower-tax states. A lot of the outmigration comes from Chicago, which is at its lowest population since 1920.

Illinoisans leaving the state don’t have to go far for lower-tax destinations. More than 20,000 of the residents migrating out of Illinois went to another midwest state, so they must be leaving for reasons besides the weather.

Illinois is also third in the nation for highest unemployment rate and total population loss. Illinois’ population shrunk by 87,311 people in 2022 based on the most recent IRS data. New data is expected this month for 2023.

More here.

Read Full Post »

Capitol News Illinois reporter Hannah Meisel is covering the corruption trial of ex-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan from the Dirksen Federal Courthouse in Chicago.

The former speaker, who left office under growing pressure related to the FBI investigation surrounding him in early 2021, faces 23 counts of racketeering, bribery, extortion and wire fraud.

To summarize, prosecutors allege he used his political power and various offices – including as a partner in his law firm – as a “criminal enterprise” to protect and enhance his power while enriching himself and his allies. But his defense attorneys argue the state is trying to criminalize the political process and baseline constituent services.

His co-defendant Mike McClain, a veteran Statehouse lobbyist and longtime Madigan confidant, was already convicted on public corruption charges last year in the separate but related “ComEd Four” trial.  The feds are again trying to show McClain is an “agent” of Madigan, while his defense attorneys say he simply engaged in legal relationship maintenance, a core function of lobbying

Below is a rundown of the coverage from the courtroom – where the trial is scheduled each Monday through Thursday well into December. This page will be updated as the trial progresses.

WEEK FIVE: NOV. 18 – 21 

Thursday, Nov. 21

Ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis, who secretly recorded Madigan for FBI, takes witness stand: As trial neared its conclusion for the week, ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis took the stand for what could be weeks of testimony. The star witness had cooperated with the FBI for years and told the jury that a bribery charge against him would be dropped if he testified against Madigan. The jury also learned that Solis’ wiretapped conversations with Madigan helped make the ex-speaker a target of the investigation in 2017, a year after Solis began cooperating. Read the story here.


Wednesday, Nov. 20

Madigan ally testifies he was rewarded with no-work contracts as ‘good soldier’ for speaker: Ed Moody held several political offices by the end of his career, thanks in large part to time he spent knocking doors on behalf of Madigan. He testified that Madigan and McClain helped him secure a $4,500 monthly contract through which he was paid indirectly by ComEd. Though he did little to no work for the utility, Moody said the payments were contingent on continuing his political work for Madigan. Read the story here.


Tuesday, Nov. 19

Wiretap: In pushing for Madigan-backed appointment, ex-ComEd CEO sought to ‘take good care’ of ‘our friend’: Chicago businessman Juan Ochoa, who was named to ComEd’s board after Madigan spent 1 ½ years pushing for the appointment, took the witness stand Tuesday. Jurors heard wiretaps regarding the appointment, including one of then-outgoing ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore telling McClain she set up a meeting between her replacement Ochoa. “You take good care of me, and so does our friend, and so I will do the best I can to take care of you,” she said. Read the story here.


Monday, Nov. 18

Madigan jury sees ‘Magic Lobbyist List’ seized from co-defendant during FBI search: McClain’s habit of printing out emails made FBI agents’ job a bit easier on May 14, 2019, as they searched his home office, another office area in the basement featuring a wall of filing cabinets and his car in the garage. The jury this week saw several of the seized documents from a series of coordinated raids, including McClain’s “magic list” of prominent Statehouse lobbyists with close ties to Madigan. Read the story here.

Coverage continues here.

For the full background on the trial, the yearslong investigation and Madigans’s fall from power, read Meisel’s preview story here: 4 decades after rising to power and nearly 4 years since his fall, former Speaker Madigan goes to trial

Read Full Post »

The Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Related: “’Agricultural Experience’ application meets a similar fate as ‘Agritourism’ did in August,”  Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing tonight,” “Village Board votes down ‘Agritourism as a Special Use’,” “August Board of Trustees meeting recording released,” “Sitting ducks,” “Special Zoning Board of Appeals meeting scheduled Tuesday

Read Full Post »

Photo courtesy Maria for 52 Facebook page

By Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner | Wirepoints

On Tuesday’s Nov. 5 ballot there’s a nonbinding referendum that asks voters if they want the state to tax millionaires a 3% surcharge on the money they make over and above $1 million. In exchange for agreeing to target millionaires, Illinois voters can expect property tax relief, the referendum reads, though the referendum is noncommittal as to how much relief, if any, it would actually provide. The state says the 3% surcharge on millionaires will give the government about $4.5 billion in new revenues.

For the state to provide property tax relief, however, it would have to actually take some of those new tax revenues and commit them to property tax relief. And that’s where Illinoisans should be highly skeptical, we warned a week ago: “Given the upcoming budget deficits…there won’t be any money left over for tax relief.”

Sure enough, it only took a few days for Gov. J.B. Pritzker and his budget office to announce that billion-dollar deficits are on their way.

Pritzker’s team on Friday released its five-year budget forecast and said it expects a whopping $3.2 billion deficit for next fiscal year (2025-2026), a $4.3 billion deficit for the following year, and $5 billion-plus deficits in each of the years 2028 through 2030.

Those deficits effectively swallow up the revenues of the “millionaire’s tax,” leaving little to nothing for property tax relief. The administration would have to raise income taxes by another $4 billion-plus to provide both property tax relief and cover the deficits. How far down into middle-income brackets would Illinois politicians have to hike income tax rates to get that all money?

Not only do the above deficits make the referendum a farce, but they are a major contradiction to the praise the governor has heaped on himself for managing the state’s finances over the last few years, in particular during COVID.

How can the wheels be coming off the bus now, when the national economy is humming along, interest rates are going down, and the governor has managed to “balance budgets”?

There are two big answers to that question. The first one is that Pritzker never actually fixed any problems. No spending reforms. No pension reforms. No tax relief. None.

The second answer to that question is that the governor and his Democratic supermajority used the windfall revenues from the covid bailouts to pay down the state’s bills, and then poured the rest into new spending (more on that below).

The covid bailouts were massive. More than $70 billion was given in loans and grants to businesses. Illinoisans got $30 billion in stimulus checks. State and local governments received more than $30 billion. Billions more went to health care and a host of other programs. All that money also had the knock-on effect of supercharging the state’s tax revenues.

It was all that money, and not Pritzker’s efforts, that covered up all of Illinois’ structural spending problems. Now the covid money is gone and reality is back.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

If the projections hold true, Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker could face difficult financial decisions, from increasing taxes to cutting spending. | Zubaer Khan/Sun-Times

By Dave McKinney | WBEZ CHICAGO

The relative financial calm that has marked Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker’s six years in office may soon be coming to a close as his administration Friday forecast a more than $3 billion budget shortfall for the next fiscal year.

That marks a major departure from years when the state would post budget surpluses on his watch and presents the governor with a painful set of potential solutions at the same time he contemplates whether to seek a third term in 2026.

Without new revenue or spending cuts, Pritzker’s budget office estimates a $3.17 billion budget shortfall at the end of Fiscal Year 2026, which would be mid-2026 as the gubernatorial election is in full swing.

To confront the problem, it’s not clear whether the governor and Democratic supermajorities in the House and Senate would favor tax or fee increases; spending cuts; delays in paying state bills; use of the state’s $2.2 billion rainy day fund; or a combination of those choices.

“While a daunting challenge to balance spending pressures in the face of a flat revenue outlook, the governor remains committed to taking steps to further improve Illinois’ fiscal position and address any potential budgetary shortfalls that may arise – as has been done every year since he took office in 2019,” the governor’s budget office said in a statement attached to the forecasts. “The ability to fund new programs will be severely limited.”

Republicans pounced on the new set of budget numbers.

This guy’s spending like a drunk sailor for the first six years of his governorship. Here we are,” said state Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, ranking Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Rose said the appetite of Illinois taxpayers to shoulder tax or fee increases is “about zero.”

“But that doesn’t mean that the supermajority, progressive, left Democrats won’t do that anyway,” Rose said. “I mean, have you talked to anybody going to the grocery store recently?”

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

BARRINGTON HILLS – OCTOBER 31, 2024

State Representative Martin McLaughlin (R-Barrington Hills) issued the following statement after attending the ongoing corruption trial of former Speaker Mike Madigan.

Rep. McLaughlin said, “On this spooky day, as the trial of former Speaker Mike Madigan casts a shadow over Illinois politics, it’s clear that our state government needs to exorcise politicians who use the office to benefit themselves instead of for the benefit of the people.

“Today, I witnessed the corruption trial in person. The ruling Democrats of Illinois continue to undermine public trust, underscoring the urgent need for transparency and accountability in our political institutions.

Speaker Madigan’s long tenure has been plagued by allegations of bribery, influence peddling, and unethical practices that have eroded the faith of Illinoisans in their elected officials. The implications of this trial extend beyond one individual; they reveal the urgent necessity for reforms that restore integrity to our governance.”

The people of Illinois deserve a government that operates with the highest ethical standards. We must enact comprehensive reforms, including, but not limited to:

  • Independent Oversight: Establishing an independent ethics commission empowered to investigate misconduct and enforce ethical standards without political interference.
  • Campaign Finance Reform: Limiting contributions from individuals and organizations to reduce the influence of money in politics, ensuring equitable access for all constituents.
  • Conflict of Interest Laws: Defining and mandating reporting for conflicts of interest, ensuring lawmakers disclose any personal or financial interests that could influence their decisions.
  • Transparency in Government Contracts: Requiring public disclosure of all government contracts and expenditures, with detailed information on the bidding process to prevent favoritism and corruption.
  • Public Accountability Measures: Encouraging citizen engagement in the oversight process through public forums, advisory committees, and increased access to government meetings and documents.

As we move forward, it is essential for lawmakers to unite in prioritizing these crucial ethics reforms. The integrity of our government hinges on the trust of the people it serves, and Springfield politicians are falling far short of the minimum standards of governance.

Only through decisive action can we begin to rebuild that trust and ensure Illinois is governed by principles of honesty and responsibility. We urge all citizens to advocate for these reforms and hold their representatives accountable.

“Together, we can pave the way for a brighter, more transparent future for Illinois. This can only be achieved through meaningful reforms that bring true accountability back to the great people of Illinois,” concluded McLaughlin.

###

Read Full Post »

Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan exits the Dirksen Federal Courthouse in Chicago on Monday, Oct. 21, after opening statements in his federal corruption concluded. | Capitol News Illinois photo by Andrew Adams

Capitol News Illinois reporter Hannah Meisel is covering the corruption trial of ex-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan from the Dirksen Federal Courthouse in Chicago.

The former speaker, who left office under growing pressure related to the FBI investigation surrounding him in early 2021, faces 23 counts of racketeering, bribery, extortion and wire fraud.

For the full background on the trial, the yearslong investigation and Madigans’s fall from power, read Meisel’s preview story here: 4 decades after rising to power and nearly 4 years since his fall, former Speaker Madigan goes to trial

To summarize, prosecutors allege he used his political power and various offices – including as a partner in his law firm – as a “criminal enterprise” to protect and enhance his power while enriching himself and his allies. But his defense attorneys argue the state is trying to criminalize the political process and baseline constituent services.

His co-defendant Mike McClain, a veteran Statehouse lobbyist and longtime Madigan confidant, was already convicted on public corruption charges last year in the separate but related “ComEd Four” trial.  The feds are again trying to show McClain is an “agent” of Madigan, while his defense attorneys say he simply engaged in legal relationship maintenance, a core function of lobbying

Below is a rundown of the coverage from the courtroom – where the trial is scheduled each Monday through Thursday well into December. This page will be updated as the trial progresses.

Monday, Oct. 21

Madigan’s approach to power at center of opening statements in his corruption trial: The jury heard Madigan’s opening statements and got a first look at a key piece of evidence that has for years been teased in legal filings. In that grainy video, Madigan meets with Chicago Ald. Danny Solis to discuss how the speaker’s property tax appeals firm could get business from an apartment development project. But Solis, the chair of Chicago City Council’s powerful zoning board, was secretly wearing a video camera. Read the story here.

Tuesday, Oct. 22

Feds ‘turned over heaven and earth’ in Madigan probe but found no real bribes, co-defendant says: It was McClain’s day for opening statements on Tuesday as he sat at a defense table for the beginning of his second corruption trial in 19 months. His defense attorneys sought to show the government had tunnel vision as a result of its yearslong investigation into Madigan and “wrongly concluded that since Mike Madigan is powerful, therefore he must be corrupt.” The jury also heard from a pair of former lawmakers who had conflicts with Madigan. Read the story here.

Wednesday, Oct. 23

ComEd exec testifies utility prepared for bankruptcy before 2011 law threw it a lifeline: McClain’s role as electric utility Commonwealth Edison’s longtime top contract lobbyist is central to the trial. On Wednesday, a ComEd executive said the company was preparing for bankruptcy in 2007 and continued in “dire” financial straits before it successfully lobbied for a 2011 law that helped make it profitable again. How that measure became law – and whether it happened legally – was the focus of Wednesday’s court proceedings. Read the story here.

Thursday, Oct. 24

‘My client is the speaker’: Jury hears wiretapped calls of Madigan co-defendant, longtime friend: The jury heard witness testimony and nearly three dozen wiretapped phone calls on Thursday. Included were calls the feds hope will bolster their argument that McClain was Madigan’s “agent” – a term McClain himself sometimes used. In another call, McClain told a colleague: “Your client is only Mike Madigan. It’s not the Democratic Party … it’s not anybody that hired you, it’s not your mom and dad. The only person you care about is Mike Madigan.” Read the story here.

Capitol News Illinois

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »