Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Big Brother’ Category

The Barrington Hills Park District Board/Riding Club of Barrington Hills will hold their monthly meeting this evening in person and via Zoom at 7:00 PM. Some topics on their agenda include:

  • Accountant, Anthony Baldassano
  • Efficiency Report
  • Tennis Project Additional Items to Complete
  • Mystery porta potty
  • Meeting Room Cleanliness and Organizational Standards
  • Fall Event Contributions (Pony Rides and/or other), and
  • Administrator/Monitor Job Duties

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here. Instructions for accessing the meeting remotely can be found here.

Read Full Post »

IDOT is rolling out five speed enforcement vans in construction zones throughout Illinois. | Provided Photo

By Sam Borcia | Lake & McHenry County Scanner

The state transportation department is rolling out photo speed enforcement vans that will be used throughout work zones in Illinois, officials said.

The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) unveiled five new photo enforcement vans that will be used throughout Illinois work zones starting this construction season.

The rollout of the vans is a continuation of a program that traces back to 20 years ago.

The vehicles are the result of a new contract with Modaxo, which allows for as-needed equipment updates and a “train the trainer” program that will put operations in the hands of IDOT and Illinois State Police.

The vans bear clear markings designating them as speed photo enforcement vehicles and feature updated technology and a large sign that displays the speed of approaching vehicles.

Highway Safety Programs Unit Chief Juan Pava said the improved technological features are a boon to the program.

“We are going to have lidar-based speed detection, which is a huge improvement over our previous contract that had radar speed detection,” Pava said.

“We have new cameras with much higher resolution, as well as new safety features within the units to keep the troopers who are deploying them safe. We’re hoping that with this new technology, we’ll be able to get better metrics to truly understand the speed issues in work zones and increase the effectiveness of the speed photo enforcement program,” Pava said.

IDOT is rolling out five speed enforcement vans in construction zones throughout Illinois. | Provided Photo

The vehicles will be used exclusively in work zones while workers are present, as mandated by the 2004 passage of the Automated Traffic Control Systems in Highway Construction or Maintenance Zones Act.

IDOT will determine where the vans should be deployed. ISP troopers will staff the vans and handle ticketing.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

By Patrick McDonald | Reason

Can state police track drivers everywhere they go via hundreds of license plate cameras? A new lawsuit says that Illinois’ widespread use of such cameras—called automatic license plate readers (ALPRs)—violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches because it breaches citizens’ reasonable expectations of privacy.

The complaint—filed by two residents of Cook County, Stephanie Scholl and Frank Bednarz, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on May 30—names the Illinois State Police (ISP), ISP Director Brendan F. Kelly, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, and Gov. J.B. Pritzker as the defendants.

“Defendants are tracking anyone who drives to work in Cook County—or to school, or a grocery store, or a doctor’s office, or a pharmacy, or a political rally, or a romantic encounter, or family gathering—every day,” the lawsuit states, “without any reason to suspect anyone of anything, and are holding onto those whereabouts just in case they decide in the future that some citizen might be an appropriate target of law enforcement.”

Illinois’ highway camera network began in 2019 with the passage of the Tamara Clayton Expressway Camera Act, named for a postal worker who was shot and killed on an interstate highway south of Chicago. The act directed the state police to “increase the amount of cameras along expressways and the State highway system.”

Illinois State Police received a $12.5 million state grant in 2021 to install cameras, which was more than doubled in June 2022 when Pritzker extended the act, granting up to $20 million in additional funding. As of publishing time, the Illinois Department of Transportation has purchased 652 license plate cameras, of which 340 are installed in Cook County, which includes Chicago.

According to the ISP’s dashboard, in the past month, the system has recorded over 215 million “detections” (when a camera captures a digital image of a license plate) and over 1. 4 million “hits” (when a captured license plate matches a plate on the state police’s “Hot List,” which includes the license plate numbers of stolen vehicles and wanted subjects). Annually, the system records over 1.5 billion detections—more than 100 times the state’s population.

Read more here.

Related: “Illinois’ use of cameras that read license plates amounts to ‘dragnet surveillance,’ lawsuit alleges,” “Illinois sued over proliferation of license plate reading cameras

Read Full Post »

Mike Blake/Reuters

By Kashmir Hill | The New York Times

You know you have a credit score. Did you know that you might also have a driving score?

Driving scores are based on how often you slam on the brakes, speed, look at your phone or drive late at night — information that, likely without your knowing, can be collected by your car or by apps on your smartphone. That data is sold to brokers, who work with auto insurers.

These scores can help determine how much drivers pay for insurance. That’s not necessarily a bad thing: Experts say that basing premiums on how we actually drive — rather than on our credit scores and whether we’re married or went to college — could be a fairer system, and ultimately improve road safety.

But this tracking will only lead to safer driving if people know that it is happening.

How it happens

The smartphone apps collecting driver data might not be obvious at first glance. One, Life360, is popular with parents who want to keep track of their families. MyRadar offers weather forecasts. GasBuddy can help you find cheap fuel on a road trip.

But all of these apps also have opt-in driving analysis features that offer insights into things like safety and fuel usage. Those insights are provided by Arity, a data broker founded by Allstate.

Arity uses the data to create driving scores for tens of millions of people, and then markets the scores to auto insurance companies.

“No one who realizes what they’re doing would consent,” said Kathleen Lomax, a New Jersey mother who recently canceled her subscription to Life360 when she found out this was happening.

Arity says that insurers ultimately need consent to link a person’s driving data to their auto insurance rate. But in some cases, the request for smartphone data may appear as boilerplate contract language — “third party data and reports” — that online shoppers regularly click past without reading.

Chi Chi Wu, a consumer rights lawyer, raised an important concern regarding data collected this way: How do insurers know when a person is driving a car, versus riding in it? (Arity said it “uses advanced technology” to determine this.)

Insurers are also getting driving data directly from people’s cars. I’ve previously written about how General Motors sold data on millions of drivers to LexisNexis, a practice it ceased after our story.

A Chevrolet assembly line. | Carlos Osorio/Associated Press

But any car with an internet connection, which most modern cars have, can send data back to the automaker.

Rob Leathern, a tech executive in Texas, was surprised last year when he got an email from Toyota saying he could get “big savings” from Progressive because he’d been identified as a safe driver, based on information collected from his 2023 Sequoia.

He didn’t realize his driving was being monitored and wanted to get to the bottom of it. It took a month of emails, phone calls and data privacy requests to find out that a data broker affiliated with Toyota called Connected Analytic Services had a Microsoft Excel file with second-by-second records listing every time he had driven faster than 85 m.p.h., slammed on his brakes or accelerated rapidly.

The possible upside

For a previous story on automakers sharing people’s data, a law professor told me that people who sign up to be monitored by their insurers, in what are commonly called usage-based insurance plans, drive better as a consequence. If drivers knew they would pay more for risky driving, we could get safer roads as a result.

Those roads have gotten more dangerous in the U.S., as a recent Times Magazine story detailed. There are more fatalities, and people are driving faster. At the same time, the police are giving out fewer tickets.

That decline in ticketing has been a problem for insurers, because traffic citations are a metric for how risky a driver someone is. It’s part of why insurers want access to real-world driving behavior, one industry expert told me.

And drivers — at least the good ones, which most of us think we are — might actually want that, too. Because the way auto insurance is priced right now can be quite unfair, said Michael DeLong of the Consumer Federation of America.

If you have a bad credit score, for example, you will pay more for auto insurance even if you have never been in an accident or received a ticket. For that reason, DeLong is in favor of insurers looking at driving behavior instead. But he has concerns: Consumers need to know it’s happening, he said, and we need to be wary of possible new forms of discrimination.

Driving late at night can hurt a person’s score because of the poorer visibility and greater percentage of tired and inebriated drivers on the road. But that could in turn penalize low-income people who work a night shift, such as janitors.

So how do you know if this is happening to you? Check the privacy settings on your car’s dashboard system and smartphone apps. If an app connects to your car, or gives you feedback about your driving, that’s a good place to start. But don’t worry about Google Maps or Waze. Google, which owns both apps, said it doesn’t provide driving data that’s linked to individuals to third parties.

Source

Read Full Post »

A pair of Cook County residents are suing the Illinois State Police, Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Attorney General Kwame Raoul over the state’s use of automated license plate readers (like this one in our Village) alleging they amount to “dragnet surveillance.” Similar devices are installed across the suburbs.

By  Emmanuel Camarillo | Chicago Sun*Times

A lawsuit accuses Illinois State Police and state officials of operating an unconstitutional “system of dragnet surveillance” through license plate-reading cameras that track motorist’s whereabouts.

The suit, filed last week by Cook County residents Stephanie Scholl and Frank Bednarz, names the state police, Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Attorney General Kwame Raoul as defendants.

“Defendants are tracking anyone who drives to work in Cook County — or to school, or a grocery store, or a doctor’s office, or a pharmacy, or a political rally, or a romantic encounter, or family gathering — every day, without any reason to suspect anyone of anything, and are holding onto those whereabouts just in case they decide in the future that some citizen might be an appropriate target of law enforcement,” the suit said.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, “challenges the warrantless, suspicion-less, and entirely unreasonable” tracking as a violation of the Fourth and 14th amendments.

The cameras — known as automated license plate readers — are described by many in law enforcement as essential in their work, and they have been proliferating over the last decade. The devices use software to scan the license plates of every passing car, recording the date, time, GPS coordinates and even pictures.

The majority of large police departments in the country now use them. Automated license plate readers in Chicago log 200 million license plates a year, giving police a detailed pattern about the daily habits of motorists and offering real-time alerts about cars wanted in crimes.

Read more here.

Related:Illinois sued over proliferation of license plate reading cameras

Read Full Post »

Chicago speed cameras hit motorists with over $102 million in fines during 2023, and $879 million total since they started flashing a decade ago. The mayor promised to eliminate the automated traffic cams, which issued a ticket every 20 seconds last year.

By Patrick Andriesen | Illinois Policy Institute

Chicago speed cameras generated over $102 million from fining drivers in 2023, slapping a motorist with a speeding ticket every 20 seconds.

One of them was Ingrid Walker, 64, of Evanston, who received two speed camera tickets and incurred a late fee on one. She is disabled and said the tickets and fee would have cost her more than 10% of her fixed income of about $800 a month.

“The speeding tickets I got were at Western and Devon. I got one when I was coming back from the pharmacist to pick up compounded medication. The people in front of me were slowing down to talk to each other on the road,” Walker said. “It seemed like a dangerous situation, so I tried to speed up to get around them.”

“I vaguely remember a flash near the intersection and weeks later, I got a speeding ticket in the mail. It was a $35 ticket. By the time I was able to contact the city to pay them, the fines had doubled, and I learned I had received a second $35 ticket at the intersection.”

The bulk fine collections included late fees last year. Speed cameras collected $46.9 million from fines paid on time and an additional $55.4 million from speeding tickets that included a late fee – more than doubling the cost of those ticket

Late penalties can turn a $35 citation into an $85 fine. A $100 speeding violation can cost the driver $244 if the payment is late.

“I’ve never received a speeding ticket before,” Walker said. “I’ve done limousine driving, I used to do car transport driving. I’m a very conscientious driver. So, it surprised me that I got it when I was trying to be safe.”

The fines made for a very difficult month and Walker missed out on some necessities.

“It felt more like a punch in the face than a slap on the hand,” she said.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

Village of Barrington Hills Board of Trustees (L-R): JC Clarke, Darby Hills, President Pro Tem/Trustee David Riff, President Brian Cecola, Laura Ekstrom, Thomas Strauss, Jessica Hoffmann

Our Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

  • [Vote] A Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Notice of Award for the 2024 Road Program Project by the Village of Barrington Hills, Illinois Resolution 24 –
  • [Vote] An Ordinance Amending the Village’s Municipal Code Title 8 Police Regulations, Chapter 4 Animal Regulations
  • [Vote] Plan Commission Appointments: 3-year term
    • Curt Crouse
    • Maggie Topping
  • [Vote] Equestrian Commission: 1-year term
    • Jane Clement, for both Chairwoman and Member
    • Jeryl Olson
    • Tricia Wood
    • Jill Zubak
  • [Vote] Police Pension Board Trustee: 2-year Term
    • George Panos
  • [Vote] Zoning Board of Appeals: 5-year Term
    • Arnold Cernik
  • The Land We Love Run – 5K/10K + 2-Mile Walk – Saturday, June 29

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Read Full Post »

The Barrington Hills Park District Board/Riding Club of Barrington Hills will hold their monthly meeting this evening in person and via Zoom at 7:00 PM. Some items on their agenda include:

  • Administrators Report:
    • Replacement computer for Administrator
    • MAG purchase
    • Tennis bid dates chosen
    • Storing statues
    • New Locks for Tractor Shed
    • Labor to install camera focusing on Tractor Shed (camera & equipment purchased last year)
    • Organizing the Tractor Shed; approve labor cost for Octavio & Kim to organize
    • Pony Club’s items in Tractor Shed organized or taken to different storage area
    • BHPD trailer cleaned and parked outside with sale sign and price posted
    • Manure spreader cleaned and stored in public area with sale sign and price posted
    • Mice nesting in the tractors
    • Make large “Horse Show” sign portable by installing wheels
    • Purchase tennis court drying roller
  • Tractor purchase review
  • Project Requests to review and policy for submitting requests
  • Advisory Committee Report
  • Rental Requests
  • Review Rental Agreement Forms, with costs added for dressage arena and round pen rentals
  • Review Riding Center Rules

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here. Instructions for accessing the meeting remotely can be found here.

Read Full Post »

Illinois state Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz, D-Glenview. during a committee hearing | BlueRoomStream

By Kevin Bessler | The Center Square

Legislation that would help parents monitor their children’s social media activity through third-party software is moving through the Illinois General Assembly.

House Bill 5380 would create the Let Parents Choose Protection Act, or Sammy’s Law, to require that social media companies provide children’s social media data to third-party apps, which parents could access. Sammy’s Law is named for 16-year-old Sammy Chapman, who died after buying fentanyl-laced drugs through video messaging app Snapchat.

“It’s about giving parents a choice to securely use third-party safety apps for any social media platform that allows children users,” said the bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz, D-Glenview.

Rose Bronstein of Chicago, who lost her son to suicide in 2021 after he was cyberbullied online, testified before the House Consumer Protection Committee.

“I want to emphasize to this committee how harmful and dangerous just one student’s singular action can be to another child online,” said Bronstein.

Hope Ledford, a spokesperson from the tech industry coalition Chamber of Progress, said her group opposes the legislation.

More here.

Read Full Post »

Illinois’ population decline crisis continues to affect virtually all counties despite fewer losses in 2023. Cook County saw nation’s second-highest number of residents moving out.

By Bryce Hill | Illinois Policy Instate

Illinois’ population decline continued for its 10th consecutive year in 2023 as the state’s population dropped by 32,826 residents from July 2022-July 2023, but new data showed losses were in 87 of Illinois’ 102 counties.

Population decline was the most pronounced in some of the state’s most populous counties, but most of the decline came from Cook County. It lost 24,494 residents during the year, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates released March 14.

While overall population decline slowed in 2023 compared to previous years, population decline continued to plague virtually every corner of the state. The next largest losses after Cook County came in St. Clair County, losing 1,247, and Lake County, which lost 1,139 residents.

Statewide, population decline continues to be driven exclusively by domestic outmigration – residents leaving for other states. Cook County’s outmigration crisis was the second-worst in the nation last year, with more than 58,000 residents leaving the county. The only county to experience heavier losses was Los Angeles County.

Kings County and Queens County, New York, also saw outmigration totaling more than 50,000 residents each. Miami-Dade County also lost nearly 48,000 residents to outmigration despite growing in terms of total population.

The largest gains from domestic migration came from counties in Florida and Texas.

Read more here.

Editorial note: Since we’re (somewhat) on the subject, Cook is the 2nd most populous county (5,087,072) in the US behind Los Angeles County. DuPage is 60th (921,213), Lake is 96th (708,760) and Will is 98th (696,355) in rank out of the 100 US counties according to Wikipedia.

Cook County has roughly twice the population of Dallas (TX), Kings (Brooklyn, NY) and Riverside (CA) Counties. So, considering these figures and the problems associated with them, why is no one talking about dividing Cook into 2-3 smaller, more manageable counties?

Probably because it makes sense.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »