Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Village Attorney’ Category

ken-griffin-founder-ceo-citadel-3699802

Billionaire hedge fund manager Ken Griffin has vowed to halt donations to his alma mater, Harvard University. | REUTERS

By Ariel Zilber | New York Post

Longtime Harvard donor Ken Griffin has vowed to withhold financial support for the university unless it undertakes significant changes to its policy regarding antisemitism as the hedge fund billionaire lamented the “whiny snowflakes” that were being produced by Ivy League schools.

“I’m not interested in supporting the institution,” Griffin, the 55-year-old hedge fund billionaire who runs Citadel and Citadel Securities, told a conference in Miami.

Griffin, who graduated from the Cambridge, Mass.-based school in 1989, donated $300 million to Harvard in the last year alone and more than $500 million total.

The Florida native who recently relocated his company headquarters to Miami from Chicago has an estimated net worth of $36.8 billion, according to Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

But he said on Tuesday that he won’t support the school unless changes were made.

“Will America’s elite university get back to their roots of educating American children — young adults — to be the future leaders of our country or are they going to maintain being lost in the wilderness of microaggressions, a DEI agenda that seems to have no real endgame, and just being lost in the wilderness?” Griffin said.

When asked by the event moderator if he was financially supporting Harvard, Griffin responded: “No.”

“I’d like that to change and I have made that clear to members of the corporate board,” the billionaire added.

Griffin said it was incumbent on Harvard to “resume their role as educating young American men and women to be leaders, to be problem solvers, to take on difficult issues.”

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

Change Petition

Property being considered for annexation by the Board of Trustees.

The recording of the January 22nd Board of Trustees meeting has been released. Once again, there are several items we would like readers to hear, but the, “Annexation of Contiguous Properties Discussion,” topic is one we recommend first.

Nearly half of the meeting was devoted to the annexation topic, and while much dialog is unintelligible due to poor sound quality, one can almost get the gist of what is being discussed.

The link to the recording can be found here, and the annexation discussion begins at the 26:20-minute mark.

Related: Village Board of Trustees meet tonight,” “A matter of trust,” “December Board of Trustees meeting recordings released,” “Change.org petition posted: ‘Why Barrington Hills should not annex Sutton and the Penny Road Properties.’

Read Full Post »

VBH Nov23Jan Zoom

Our Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

  • PUBLIC HEARING: Village of Barrington Hills Annual Appropriation Ordinance for the Fiscal Year Beginning January 1, 2024, and Ending December 31, 2024 Appropriation Ord FY 2024 – Draft.pdf
  • [Vote] Annual Appropriation Ordinance for the Fiscal Year Beginning January 1, 2024 and Ending December 31, 2024 Ordinance 24 –
  • [Vote] Resolution for Use of Motor Fuel Tax Funds on Snow Removal 2024 Resolution 24 –
  • [Vote] Ordinance Amending the General Penalty of the Village Code Adjusting the Maximum Fine Ordinance 24 –
  • Annexation of Contiguous Properties Discussion

The fourth item on the list amending the amount(s) of, “General Penalty of the Village Code,” reads:

“Any person convicted of or found liable for a violation of any section of this code shall be fined in a sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) and not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) for any one offense, excepting any specific section of this code wherein the maximum fine is limited to a lesser amount.”

Both amounts are too low, especially the $100.00 amount. By the time all the costs, from start to finish, are aggregated to collect $100.00, the Village will likely lose money (and no doubt has been for many years).

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Related: A matter of trust,” “December Board of Trustees meeting recordings released,” “Change.org petition posted: ‘Why Barrington Hills should not annex Sutton and the Penny Road Properties.’

Read Full Post »

Barrington Village Hall

The Village of Barrington President and Board of Trustees will have their regular monthly meeting tomorrow evening starting at 7:30 PM. Their agenda includes:

“ORDINANCE #24- : Amending Title 6, “Motor Vehicles and Traffic”, of the Barrington Village Code Regarding the Regulations of Unscheduled Stops and the Unloading of Passengers by Intercity Vehicles Within the Village of Barrington, Illinois (Re: Chapter 3, “Parking Regulations” – New Section 6-3-13, “Regulations of Unscheduled Stops and Unloading of Passengers by Intercity Vehicles”)”

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here.

It makes perfect sense for Barrington officials to address this now, since they have a Metra Station in their village.  However, recent or upcoming meetings of some other nearby communities where there are not train stations (except for one) have included no such amendments to their ordinances.

Here are some examples:

  • The Village of Algonquin Village Board met on January 2nd, and they did not have anything related to unscheduled bus drop-offs on their agenda.
  • The Village of Lake Barrington Board of Trustees also met on January 2nd, and they included no amendments to their codes addressing bus drop-offs.
  • The Village of Fox River Grove Board met more than a week after, ”…a busload of migrants from Texas were dropped off at a Metra station,” on January 2nd.  In spite of this, they did not have any code amendments of this sort on their agenda.

This Tuesday, January 9th, the Village of Inverness Village Board will have their regular monthly, and the topic of migrants or busses is nowhere to be found on their agenda.

Also this Tuesday, the Village of Carpentersville Board of Trustees have their regular monthly meeting. Busses are absent from the agenda.

Clearly these villages are not alarmed by recent news reports and events, and they continue to conduct business as usual.

As we reported, our Board of Trustees called a Special Meeting Wednesday to pass a Ordnance to allow them to fine just about everyone involved in the unscheduled unloading of occupants of busses without Village permission. They can also impound the busses.

Recordings of the meeting can be found here.

Related: Busload of migrants dropped off in Fox River Grove, falsely told they were in Chicago,” “Special Board of Trustees meeting today,” “Special Board of Trustees meeting agenda updated,” “Palatine police turn away migrant bus at train station

Read Full Post »

Change Prtition

Recording of the December 19th Board of Trustees meeting has been released. While there are several items we would like to weigh in on, the, “Annexation of Contiguous Properties Discussion,” topic* on the agenda is on top the list.

There were a few public comments addressing a property currently in the Village and one in unincorporated Cook County (pictured above). Both are off Old Sutton Road, and within roughly a mile of one another.

The property in the Village has been topic of multiple comments at Board of Trustee and Zoning Board meetings for some time now, yet nothing seems to have been done by the Village.

As for the unincorporated Cook County comments, President Cecola and the Board have approved taking steps to annex the property described by a Change.org petition as the, “Sutton and the Penny Road Properties.” One of the reasons for this apparently is the appearance of this property, and the belief our Village Code will somehow improve the situation. However, when traveling throughout our Village, numerous and obvious Code violations can be seen in plain view, and no corrective actions seem to take place.

Our President and Board are willing to spend our tax dollars to attempt to annex this property and improve the aesthetics of it presumably through Village Code enforcement. You decide if this makes sense, especially considering the number of Code violations in plain view from Village roads presently that are not addressed.

The December meeting recordings can be found here.

Related:Change.org petition posted: ‘Why Barrington Hills should not annex Sutton and the Penny Road Properties.’

* As has become the Cecola administration’s practice, no explanation of what this topic was about was provided to the public in advance of the meeting in the agenda.  Yet, as the recordings show, some privileged residents were informed in advance so they could prepare.

Read Full Post »

facepalm-really

The agenda for the Special Board of Trustees meeting at noon today has been updated with less that two hours to spare. The Illinois Open Meetings Act in essence states:

Agenda posting: Public bodies that have a website must post the agenda of any regular meetings of the governing body (i.e. County Board, Board of Trustees, Board of Commissioners, School Board, etc) at least 48 hours prior to said meeting. Any agenda of a regular meeting that is posted on a public body’s website shall remain posted until the regular meeting is concluded.

Since this a Special meeting, at least 24 hours posting is required.

A copy of the revised agenda can be viewed here.

Related: Special Board of Trustees meeting today

Read Full Post »

VBH 11.23Zoom

Our Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

  • [Vote] An Ordinance for the Levy and Assessment of Taxes for the Fiscal Year Beginning January 1, 2023 and Ending December 31, 2023 Ordinance 23 –
  • Village of Barrington Hills Annual Appropriation Ordinance for the Fiscal Year Beginning January 1, 2024, and Ending December 31, 2024 – DRAFT
  • [Vote] A Resolution Approving the Execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Illinois Office of the Comptroller to Participate in the Local Debt Recovery Program Resolution 23 –
  • [Vote] A Resolution Approving the Purchase of Emergency Automatic External Defibrillator Equipment from Second Chance Cardiac Solutions, Inc. Resolution 23 –
  • [Vote] A Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Police-Related Equipment, Software and Services from Axon Enterprise, Inc. Resolution 23 –
  • [Vote] Ordinance Amending Building Code Regulations Set Forth in Section 4- 2-7 of the Village Code Regarding Chamber Septic Systems Ordinance 23 –
  • [Vote] A Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement Among the Village of Bartlett, the Village of Hoffman Estates, The Village of Barrington Hills, and the Village of Barrington, for the Equally Shared Costs for Work Towards the Recertification of a Quiet Corridor Along the Canadian National Railroad Resolution 23 –
  • [Vote] A Resolution Approving an Adjustment to the Professional Services Rate for John Z. Toscas As Special Counsel for Administrative Adjudication Hearing Officer Services Resolution 23 –
  • Annexation of Contiguous Properties Discussion

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Read Full Post »

Union Label

(Scott Stantis/ For the Chicago Tribune)

By The Editorial Board Wall Street Journal

The alliance between Democrats and public unions is a dominant feature of modern politics, and the mutual love is growing. That’s the message of a new report by the Commonwealth Foundation, which dug into how government unions fund politics through direct campaign spending and political action committees.

The four largest government unions are the National Education Association (NEA), American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (Afscme). In the 2021-2022 election cycle, they spent more than $708 million combined on politics. Since 2012 union spending on federal elections has nearly tripled.

Democrats and their causes receive 95.7% of the cash from unions’ political action committees. In 2021-22 the Big Four gave more than $29 million to the SEIU’s United We Can super PAC and the NEA Advocacy Fund super PAC which support federal candidates for office. Another $16 million went to wealthy climate crusader Tom Steyer’s leftwing For Our Future Pac. Some $3 million went to Fair Share Massachusetts which supports a state wealth tax.

Big money also flows at the state level, where public unions all but run many state capitals. In 2021-2022, the four largest government unions spent $27.9 million in Illinois, $24.9 million in California, $13.2 million in Minnesota and $12.1 million in Pennsylvania.

Unions accounted for almost 83% of current Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s campaign funds, and teacher’s unions were the lion’s share. They are getting their money’s worth. Mr. Johnson will be renegotiating the Chicago Teachers Union contract in 2024 and unions will be on both sides of the negotiating table.

Illinois Speaker of the House Emanuel “Chris” Welch received $1.25 million in union PAC cash in the 2021-22 election cycle, more than any other state legislator in the country. Mr. Welch recently let an Illinois school-choice program for low-income children die because it was opposed by the unions.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

11.16.23 BOT Graphic

11.16.23 BOT Audio

Our Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

  • ENGINEERING PRESENTATION – Trotter and Associates, Inc.
  • Levy and Assessment of Taxes for the Fiscal Year Beginning January 1, 2023 and Ending December 31, 2023 – Draft
  • [Vote] A Resolution Adopting a Regular Meeting Calendar for 2024 Resolution 2 23 –, and
  • [Vote] An Ordinance Regarding the Illinois Paid Leave For All Workers Act Ordinance 23 –

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Read Full Post »

DD

32W939 Algonquin Road

The Village Zoning Board of Appeals meets this evening at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

  • [VOTE] APPEAL: VETERINARY CLINIC USE IN B3 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (32W939 Algonquin Road)
  • CODE MODIFICATION DISCUSSION – RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGY, and
  • [VOTE] RULES FOR REMOTE PARTICIPATION

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »