Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Perjury’ Category

Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan was sentenced to 7.5 years in prison but his allies now run the Illinois House and Illinois Democratic Party. The rules he created to run his machine still work for new operators.

By Dylan Sharkey | Illinois Policy Institute

Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan was sentenced to 7.5 years in prison and a $2.5 million fine, ending his era in Illinois politics but not his influence: his allies took over his leadership roles and now operate the machine he built.

The ComEd bribery scheme: How Madigan’s machine worked

In 2020, federal prosecutors revealed ComEd, Illinois’ largest electric utility, engaged in a yearslong bribery scheme for favors from Madigan. The utility traded contracts, do-nothing jobs and legal business to Madigan’s allies in exchange for favorable legislation. It also meant internships for loyalists and a board seat for one of Madigan’s picks.

Though Madigan denied wrongdoing, the evidence mounted. Federal subpoenas, raids and indictments tied to ComEd and other schemes pointed directly to his operation. Madigan was indicted on racketeering charges in 2022 and found guilty of multiple federal charges, including bribery conspiracy, in February 2025.

How Springfield insiders shut down the investigation

When Madigan was implicated, but not charged, in the ComEd bribery scheme in 2020, an Illinois House committee was tasked with investigating his role. But that committee, led by Madigan allies state Reps. Chris Welch and Lisa Hernandez, quickly shut down the inquiry.

Democrats blocked witness testimony and stonewalled subpoenas, even after federal prosecutors gave the green light. Now that Madigan is going to jail, there was clearly enough evidence for a real investigation.

Please read on here.

Read Full Post »

For those confused about the recent appointment of Darby Hills to the Illinois State Senate, let’s clarify the facts and the legal process unfolding in McHenry County.

The judge in this case was asked to rule on two critical issues. First, whether the Lake County Republican Chairman could retroactively remedy the fact that Ms. Hills was not a Republican after McConchie‘s retirement. Brin appointed Hills as a republican precinct committeeperson —something both she and the chairman acknowledged needed to be done to remedy this deficit. The court allowed the chairman to appoint Ms. Hills as a precinct committeeperson weeks after Senator McConchie vacated his seat, arguably ignoring the statutes requirements and effectively temporarily enabling the appointment.

The second, and more consequential issue—the heart of the lawsuit—is whether Ms. Hills was a Republican at the time of the vacancy. Rather than interpret the relevant statute, requiring a nominee have valid Republican credentials the judge declined to rule on that core question. The case is now on appeal, and the Appellate Court will be asked to determine whether state law was properly followed and whether Hills was legally eligible for appointment under party rules and Illinois statutes.

Regardless of how one defines “Republican,” Ms. Hills’ voting record in Springfield speaks volumes. In just a short time, she has cast key votes that are out of step with Republican principles—votes that were anti-Second Amendment, pro-DEI mandates, anti-business, and in lockstep with teachers’ union interests.

The outcome of this legal appeal will be watched closely. If the Appellate Court finds that Ms. Hills was ineligible for appointment, it raises serious questions:

  • Will she be allowed to retain her Senate seat?
  • Will her votes be invalidated?
  • Will she be required to return taxpayer funds paid in salary during her disputed tenure?

Of course, there remains a straightforward path to public office: campaign, knock on doors, earn support, and win an election—both in a Republican primary and a general contest. But for now, it seems, Ms. Hills has taken a shortcut, bypassing voters in favor of backroom maneuvering.

Observers, constituents, and constitutional conservatives across the state will be following this case closely—not only for what it reveals about one Senate seat, but for what it says about process, transparency, the integrity of some in the Republican party and our electoral system.

Related:Residents deserve full disclosure – an update,” “Residents deserve full disclosure,” “’No more dog and pony shows, please!” “Gun rights advocacy group expresses displeasure with terms like ‘RINO, Backstabbing Traitor’ and ‘Botox Queen’ describing a senator’s vote on Senate Bill 8,” “Darby Hills Sworn In to Represent Illinois’ 26th Senate District,” “Darby Hills chosen — again — to succeed Dan McConchie in state Senate,” “’The Fix’ is in?,” “Darby Hills’ appointment to state Senate on hold as Republicans reopen applications for McConchie’s seat,” “26th Legislative District Committee meeting cancelled,” “State Senator seat at any price?,” ”26th Legislative District Committee meeting tomorrow,” “Do Over Scheduled for Meeting to Replace State Senator Dan McConchie,” “Restraining order sought to block 26th Senate appointment amid legal fight,” “Lawsuit challenges legality of GOP appointment to 26th State Senate seat,” “McConchie’s would-be successor isn’t a Republican and can’t serve, lawsuit alleges,” “Darby Hills Appointed as New State Senator for Illinois’ 26th Senate District

Read Full Post »

The 26th Senate District Committee will meet at 1:00 PM today, February 28th, 2025, to appoint a replacement for Dan McConchie. The meeting location is 765 North Quentin Road in Palatine, and is open to the public and via Zoom:

Zoom link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88391007467?pwd=EaBCQkvZljCqzlBd6A5lwZaFn0X32o.1

Meeting ID: 883 9100 7467 Passcode: 045947

Read Full Post »

How things work? Darby Hills is listed as a “Public Precinct Committeeperson” in the 84th Precinct of ELA TOWNSHIP* as of 2/18/25 at 5:09:59PM. Problem is she does not live in Ela Township.

The backroom maneuvering to install the unqualified Darby Hills as a State Senator has only gotten uglier. Hills allegedly put her name in following recruitment by Dan McConchie, Keith Brin, and John Curran, and another attempt will be made by this threesome to ensure she secures the title of State Senator.

Curran, Brin, and McConchie first attempted to install Joe Salvi in the seat through a backroom deal, but when that failed, they turned to Hills. Now, they are hoping to push her through without public scrutiny.

The Barrington Hills Observer has learned that a second nominating meeting will take place tomorrow at 1 PM at the Palatine Township Republican offices, across the street from Rand Road (Route 12) and Quentin Road. This meeting has not been properly noticed to the public, likely by design—to minimize pushbacks.

Not since Helene Walsh have we seen such Republican incompetence. It is astonishing that Senate GOP Leader John Curran and his team have chosen to back Hills over three highly qualified Republican candidates:

  • Chris Borawski – A longtime conservative leader.
  • Tosi Ufodike – A resolute Republican candidate.
  • Martin McLaughlin – A three-term State Representative (Republican) and former Mayor.

Hills’ lack of Republican credentials is just one of many concerns. Just days ago, she appointed as a Precinct Committeeperson in Ela Township* (not her own neighborhood). This was clearly a last-minute move to create the illusion of Republican involvement.

Can anyone seriously imagine Darby Hills walking door-to-door in Lake Zurich or Palatine, promoting other Republican candidates? The very job of a Precinct Committeeperson?

Why is this happening? Money! Hills has promised to self-fund her campaign, and the Senate Republican leadership is weak and desperate for cash.

The real question is: How far will local Republican leaders go to pretend Darby Hills is a legitimate legislator?

Source

Related:26th Legislative District Committee meeting tomorrow,” “Do Over Scheduled for Meeting to Replace State Senator Dan McConchie,” “Restraining order sought to block 26th Senate appointment amid legal fight,” “Lawsuit challenges legality of GOP appointment to 26th State Senate seat,” “McConchie’s would-be successor isn’t a Republican and can’t serve, lawsuit alleges,” “Darby Hills Appointed as New State Senator for Illinois’ 26th Senate District

Read Full Post »

Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan exits after the jury delivered a partial verdict in his and former lobbyist Michael McClain’s corruption trial at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse on Feb. 12, 2025. | Audrey Richardson/Chicago Tribune

By Daniel I. Dorfman | Pioneer Press

Both current and former Illinois legislators are applauding last week’s guilty verdict in the corruption case against former House Speaker Michael Madigan. Now there are calls for additional changes in laws in an attempt to change the state’s lengthy history of political chicanery.

On Feb. 12, a federal jury found Madigan guilty of 10 criminal counts including bribery, wire fraud, and conspiracy. Following two weeks of deliberations after a trial that began last October, the jury acquitted on seven other charges and did not come to a verdict on other counts, including racketeering conspiracy.

With the verdict, Madigan joins a list of many other high-profile Illinois politicians convicted for illegal behavior.

Madigan, who first became Speaker in 1983, started to lose his grip on power several years ago as some scandals reached his office.

State Rep. Marty McLaughlin (R-Barrington) did not serve in the House when Madigan was Speaker but was interested enough in the case that he attended Madigan’s trial one day last fall.

“It was eye-opening to be at the trial and it was disappointing to hear some of the testimony,” he said.

He added, “As a legislator, we should be spending more time on solving problems and less time on backroom deals and phone calls and helping friends out,” he said. “We are supposed to be helping out constituents in the state, we are not supposed to be helping out specific people for inappropriate reasons.”

Read more here.

Related:Darby Hills Appointed as New State Senator for Illinois’ 26th Senate District

Read Full Post »

The Barrington Hills Park District Board/Riding Club of Barrington Hills will hold their monthly meeting this evening in person and via Zoom at 7:00 PM. Some topics on their agenda include:

  • Plum Farms proposal
  • Riding Center Advisory Committee Report
  • Administrator Report

A copy of their agenda can be viewed here. Instructions for accessing the meeting remotely can be found here.

Read Full Post »

By Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner | Wirepoints

Love Trump or hate him, he won on an agenda to disrupt the country’s broken border, the economy, and how Washington itself works. But even as many Trump detractors soften their stance against him, agreeing that too much has gone too far in America, Illinois is going the other way. Gov. J.B. Pritzker and leaders of the Democratic party are working hard to Trump-proof Illinois. They, their public sector union allies and a friendly media don’t want any disruption of their ironclad control over Illinois, never mind the continuing decline of the state.

Now, we’re not arguing for Trump to come and directly target Illinois for disruption, though we’ll benefit from much of what the president does at the federal level. Disruption at the border, great. We’ll happily accept the relief. Disruption of the massive, distortionary green energy subsidies, also great. Illinoisans’ energy costs have been jumping of late. Disruption of the rules and actions that limit free speech and force feed DEI on our institutions. Absolutely. Good riddance to the cancel culture of the past few years.

But the real disruption Illinois needs is local and Illinois-specific. We don’t need Trump for that. We don’t need the feds. We don’t need outsiders. What we need is for us to do it ourselves. Ordinary Illinoisans disrupting what’s wrong with our state. Dismantling the laws that now make Illinois an extreme outlier on the many fiscal, economic and demographic issues that matter most.

That disruption starts with clawing back the extreme powers that state legislators have given the public sector unions over the last few decades – in exchange for support at the ballot box. There’s perhaps no other state in the country where the politicians and the public unions are more intertwined than Illinois. Take Chicago, where the unions and the politicians have become one and the same: Brandon Johnson is a CTU boss, the head of Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago mayor all in one.

It’s gotten so bad that Illinoisans are now subservient to their public servants.

How about disruption at Illinois’ failed schools, where 1.1 million of the state’s public school children can’t read at grade level? We’ve written ad nauseam about how Illinois’ education system gave up long ago on ensuring kids learn how to read and do math. It’s not an exaggeration, as we wrote recently in Fresh data: Illinois officials graduate record 88% of students despite tragic literacy, numeracy rates.

The disruption must be 100% universal school choice, like what’s happening all around Illinois. Universal choice means any family – of any race and any means – that wants to send their kid to a school of their choice can access an $8,000-$10,000 voucher or an education savings account. Imagine a single mom in Decatur being able to take her kid out of the Decatur Public Schools, where just 10% of all kids read at grade level, and to try instead a private school obsessed with reading and learning.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

By Hannah Meisel  | Capitol News Illinois

Over the last 2 ½ months, the jury in former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan’s corruption trial has heard the longtime Democratic leader’s voice dozens of times on wiretapped phone calls and in secretly recorded video footage.

Since October, jurors have seen the longtime powerbroker as he sat taking notes or otherwise watching testimony from nearly 60 witnesses from his seat at the head of his defense table in a wood-paneled federal courtroom.

But on Tuesday, the jury was finally able to fully observe Madigan – including the mannerisms and idiosyncratic speech patterns his attorney has accused the feds of willfully misinterpreting – as he took the stand in his own defense.

“Did you ever trade your public office for private gain?” Madigan attorney Dan Collins asked his client almost immediately after beginning his line of questioning early Tuesday afternoon.

“No,” Madigan said, turning to the jury as he gave his answer.

“Did you ever demand a thing of value in exchange for a promise to take official action?”

“No,” Madigan replied again before giving the same answer when asked if he’d ever accepted a “thing of value” in exchange for such a promise.

Collins repeated similar bursts of questions several more times before trial adjourned for the day, often pausing after the former speaker’s final denial, letting his “no” hang in the air before moving on to the next subject area.

Bribery charges

The repeated questions – and Madigan’s consistent answers – were aimed at refuting prosecutors’ main theory of bribery, which makes up nearly a third of the 23 counts Madigan faces. The indictment, first filed in March 2022 but expanded later that year, alleges Madigan helped electric utility Commonwealth Edison and telecom giant AT&T Illinois pass key legislation through Springfield in exchange for jobs and contracts for Madigan allies.

Additionally, prosecutors claim Madigan used his elected and political power to recruit clients for his property tax appeals law firm. The feds allege that Madigan – along with longtime Springfield lobbyist Mike McClain, who was indicted on six of the 23 counts – formed a “criminal enterprise” meant to enhance Madigan’s power in addition to enriching himself and those close to him.

Government lawyers have portrayed Madigan as an all-powerful leader who controlled an entire branch of state government as well as the political careers of hundreds of Democrats during his 36 years as House speaker. Meanwhile, Madigan’s attorneys have attempted to undermine that portrayal in their cross-examinations of 50 government witnesses and their defense case that began shortly before the holidays.

Madigan’s decision to testify furthers that work, but it’s a risky move. When prosecutors get their turn to cross-examine the former speaker as early as Wednesday, they will likely attempt to impeach him on the stand after Madigan directly contradicted testimony from several witnesses who’ve testified thus far.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

The nation’s longest-serving legislative speaker, a woman who called herself “super mayor” and a collection of other self-serving public servants are among the highest-profile corruption cases in decades. Here’s the naughty list for 2024.

By Patrick Andriesen | Illinois Policy Institute

While most Illinoisans are preparing to share gifts, multiple probes into Illinois corruption remind us just how many powerful public servants wanted to receive gifts in 2024.

Ranked as the second-most corrupt state in the nation, Illinois’ corrupt politicians stand out in a crowded field for exploiting taxpayers’ good will. Here are some notable public corruption and misconduct cases from 2024.

Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan

The nearly two-month-long federal corruption trial of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, the nation’s longest-serving legislative speaker, is predicted to come to a close in mid-January 2025.

Madigan is under indictment on 23-counts, including federal racketeering and bribery charges. Prosecutors allege Madigan ran a criminal enterprise, exchanging influence on key legislation for job opportunities for constituents and other allies.

The former speaker and his longtime political operative, Michael McClain, are accused of pressuring developers to hire Madigan’s law firm as well as conspiring with Commonwealth Edison and AT&T Illinois to provide no-work jobs for the speaker’s associates in return for legislative support in Springfield.

Court documents state Madigan netted $2.85 million in illegitimate funds.

Madigan’s current corruption trial follows a more than decade-long federal investigation into the former speaker that led to at least 21 individuals and businesses facing related criminal charges.

Madigan allies, including McClain, his former chief of staff and the “ComEd Four,” were found guilty by a federal court in 2023 in connection with Madigan’s patronage hiring scheme.

But Madigan denies all of it. He claimed jobs were given to his constituents because of good recommendations, not illegal influence.

Former state lawmaker Michael McClain

Former state lawmaker and longtime Springfield lobbyist Michael McClain is currently facing trial for a second time in the past two years for conspiring with Madigan to commit bribery and racketeering. McClain was Madigan’s long-time confidant and fixer.

McClain is currently facing trial on a 23-count indictment, including federal racketeering, bribery and wire fraud charges alongside his codefendant and longtime political ally, Madigan. McClain has pleaded “not guilty” to the charges.

McClain also denied wrongdoing as a defendant in the “ComEd Four” case before being found guilty in May 2023. He was convicted on all charges of conspiring to influence and reward Madigan for helping pass legislation favorable to Commonwealth Edison in Springfield.

Former Chicago Alderman Edward Burke

Once considered the most powerful alderman in Chicago, former 14th Ward Ald. Ed Burke was sentenced to two years in prison and fined $2 million in June 2024 after being convicted on all but one of the 14 counts of racketeering, attempted bribery, attempted extortion and other crimes.

Burke used his aldermanic powers and city finance committee chairmanship to divert business to his private tax law firm, Klafter & Burke, and shake down groups attempting to work with City Hall. The cigar-chomping, pinstripe-suited politician was in power for five decades.

The cases included threatening to block a proposed fee increase at the Field Museum, shaking down owners of a Burger King in his ward, accepting contracts for his personal law firm in return for support in the city council and blocking approval of the Chicago Post Office redevelopment until Klafter & Burke was hired by the developers.

The list (sadly) continues here.

Read Full Post »

“We haven’t had population loss.” It’s a claim Gov. JB Pritzker and his allies have made before, and it’s preposterous. Unfortunately, they get away with it because the media and many of our supposed watchdogs let them.

By Mark Glennon and John Klingner | Wirepoints

Deputy Illinois Governor Andy Manar said this last week:

We haven’t had population loss. There have never been more people living in the State of Illinois than there is today. In the census there’s a thing called the post enumeration survey (PES) that shows that Illinois gained population. It’s a correction. and it’s a real correction from the Census Bureau…. Illinois is not losing people, it is gaining people.

It’s a claim Gov. JB Pritzker and his allies have made before.

It’s preposterous.

Manar has no basis for his claims and overwhelming evidence says, instead, that Illinois has lost population year after year, probably a decade. Making matters worse, Manar’s claim was blindly accepted by Better Government Association President David Greising who moderated the panel where Manar made the claim.

Here are the facts:

For starters, the ten-year census on which Manar relied is four years old now. Not only does he ignore what’s happened since April 1, 2020, the census effective date, but his claim of “never been more people living in the State of Illinois” isn’t true either. The decennial census showed a small loss of 18,124 people over the decade, but the flight problem did not become apparent until about 2014. That’s when annual census estimates, as well as other evidence, began to show the downturn, continuing every year thereafter. Illinois population therefore probably peaked about then, not now as Manar claims.

Further, April 2020 is about when violent crime skyrocketed, including the 2020 riots in Chicago that summer, which one can reasonably assume contributed to flight from the state. Direct evidence of what has happened since April 2020 indicates accelerating flight. For that, we can start with the Census Bureau’s annual estimates, which show further decline each year since 2020. We lost a net 100,016 people in 2021, and another 107,826 in 2022 and a further loss of 32,826 people in 2023.

As for the Post Enumerations Survey (PES) Manar focused on, no, it does not officially alter the results of the 2020 decennial census, which showed the small 18,124 loss. The PES is a survey conducted after every census to attempt to identify potential errors. It’s based on answers from just 0.1% of American households, which the census says is too small to make any official changes with.

Finally, the Census Bureau recently announced it would do a one-time adjustment of Illinois’ population based on an undercount identified by the Post-Census Group Quarters Review (PCGQR). The change adds 46,400 Illinoisans, which the census says it will use to adjust future, annual estimates. That tiny adjustment hardly dents the far bigger losses since 2020.

Beyond Census Bureau numbers, we can look at IRS migration data. The IRS numbers are precise because they know exactly how many people file returns and where they are moving to and from. We’ve documented those numbers year after year. For 2022, the most recent year reported by the IRS, Illinois netted a loss of 87,000 residents, with 175,000 moving into Illinois from other states and 262,000 moving out. Since 2000, Illinois has lost a net 1.6 million people to net out-migration, according to the IRS data.

How about moving van numbers? Headlines have been routine for years about numbers from moving companies showing Illinois among the nation’s biggest losers. The most recent annual study from United Van Lines, for example, says Illinois had the highest percentage of moves being outbound: 61%.

When Manar made his population claims, Greising’s response was “Oh, okay, sorry…. Okay, Okay.” Shame on Greising. The facts laid out above have been long published by many sources and it’s inexcusable for him to kowtow to conflicting government propaganda, which he is supposed to be challenging.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »