Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Home Occupation Ordinance’ Category

Developer Nick Serra steps April 7, 2026, onto the future balcony of a newly constructed third floor unit in a building he’s redeveloping to add rental apartments in Chicago’s Uptown neighborhood. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)

By Olivia Olander | Chicago Tribune

Above the bay windows that run up the center of a two-story apartment building in Uptown, Nick Serra stands on what had been the roof but will soon be the balcony for a new third-floor unit he’s adding.

In many circumstances, the construction work would be a sure sign that another traditional Chicago apartment building was being gutted and converted into a single-family home that could fetch more than $1 million.

Instead, the new top floor will be a four-bedroom apartment that, along with other changes Serra is making, will turn the entire building into a six-unit development capable of housing a dozen people.

“Versus, you know, two people and their golden retriever,” Serra said, as he stood last week on the unfinished top floor.

Serra is part of a cohort of developers adding units to existing buildings rather than tearing them down or converting them to single-family homes — a practice many housing advocates say helps with affordability in high-demand neighborhoods. But finding lots zoned to allow the additional square footage and density he needs is difficult, particularly on the North Side, where he primarily works. Under current rules, he has managed roughly two dozen such projects over five years.

Those difficulties finding lots for such projects could change significantly under a package of proposals from Gov. JB Pritzker that would make it easier for developers and property owners across Illinois to build the kind of multiunit housing Serra specializes in.

The plan, a cornerstone political and policy piece of Pritzker’s State of the State address in February, would loosen zoning restrictions that currently limit the residential density allowed on a given lot and, supporters say, open the door to new multifamily buildings across the state.

Additional local rules for building size and height could still apply, potentially restricting a building of the exact dimensions of the one in Uptown.

But the prospect of allowing four-flats or six-unit apartments on quiet suburban streets, and granny flats in backyards across the state, has raised alarms among many local leaders.

The response from the governor’s office? Something has to be done in the face of a housing shortage across the state, and the Pritzker administration is pushing forward anyway.

Story continues here.

Related: Pritzker to propose statewide zoning laws to spur homebuilding, limit local control,” “McLaughlin’s press conference video recording regarding Pritzker’s proposed municipal zoning powers grab posted,” “‘It’s just a bad idea’: Suburban officials oppose Pritzker’s plan to reduce local control over residential It’s just zoning

Read Full Post »

The following was posted to the Village website:

Village of Barrington Hills Response to Media Request

U-Pick Flower Farm Zoning Applications for Agritourism, Agricultural Experiences and Agricultural Sales

“Recently, the Village was contacted by a local news outlet asking for the Village’s position pertaining to submitted text amendment applications providing for agritourism, agricultural experiences and agricultural sales.

The Village of Barrington Hills is unique in that it is almost entirely a residential community. For decades, the Village’s zoning regulations have been designed to promote and protect the overall residential character of the Village.

To achieve that purpose, the Village’s zoning regulations do not allow outdoor commercial/business retail use of a residential property or other primary or secondary uses that are incompatible with single-family residential use in the Village’s residential areas.  Again, this is to protect the residential nature of these areas and the peace and tranquility that Village residents have come to expect and enjoy on their properties.

In May 2024, the Village became aware that an outdoor, commercial retail u-pick flowers establishment was operating on a single-family residential property.  This commercial business was open to the general public, open and visible to other Village residents, and advertised as a retail business on littleduckyflowerfarm.com and other media outlets.  At that time, the Village notified the Property Owners that their outdoor, commercial u-pick flowers operation on their single-family residential property was not permitted under the Village’s zoning regulations.

Since that time, the Property Owners have sought a number of Zoning Code changes requesting significant and fundamental changes in the Village’s residential zoning regulations that would allow for their outdoor, commercial retail u-pick flowers operation and could also allow other similar outdoor commercial business operations to occur on every residential single-family property in the Village.  

These proposals were thoughtfully considered by the Village’s Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board of Trustees in formal public zoning proceedings.  The Village’s Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended against the Property Owners’ various proposals finding that the proposed outdoor commercial use of properties is not compatible with the intended residential use of property in the Village’s residential area. The Village’s Zoning Board of Appeals was particularly concerned that under these various proposals, similar outdoor commercial operations could be allowed to occur on every residential single-family property in the Village.

The Village Board has accepted the recommendations of the Village Zoning Board of Appeals and has not approved the Property Owner’s various proposals that would allow for an outdoor, commercial retail u-pick flowers operation on residential property but would also potentially allow for other similar outdoor commercial business operations on every residential single-family property in the Village.  

The Village Board’s decisions have been based on the far-reaching implications of the proposals and not based solely in regard to any single property. In all of their decisions, the Board must carefully consider the long-term effects for the entire Village.”

Related: “Zoning Board delivers third strike to Little Ducky Farm,” “Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing (AGAIN) tonight,” “News to us…,” “Village Board of Trustees meets tonight,” “’Agricultural Experience’ application meets a similar fate as ‘Agritourism’ did in August,” “Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing tonight,” “Village Board votes down ‘Agritourism as a Special Use’,” “August Board of Trustees meeting recording released,” “Sitting ducks,” “Special Zoning Board of Appeals meeting scheduled Tuesday

Read Full Post »

Resident will now be assessed the actual costs of Zoning Board services rendered to fulfill their requests.

Monday evening the Village Board of Trustees approved updated fee schedules for, “Zoning Matters,” and overweight vehicles.

We applaud this move, especially considering it was revealed that at some point the Village ceased charging fees beyond only the standard application fees for Zoning Board services such as (and especially) attorney’s fees. While we believe our Village should not be operating for profit, it definitely should not be operating at a loss providing legal, consulting and other services at nearly no charges until now.

A partial section of the newly updated fees reads:

“Zoning Fee Schedule*

  • Appeal $1,000
  • Text Amendment, $1,500
  • Variation $1,000
  • Map Amendment-Any District-Permitted Uses Only $1,500
  • Special Uses $1,500.

*Additional Expense: The fee includes the initial review by staff and the village attorney, public notice (if applicable, 1 time), and Zoning Board Meeting (1 meeting); additional fees may be charged at the discretion of staff in the event an application is extensive, requires additional reviews beyond those stated or the application submitted in incomplete and requires multiple reviews.

Additionally, the Zoning Board of Appeals and/or the Village Board may utilize the services of professional consultants for research, investigation, and professional opinion, for assistance in arriving at recommendations or decisions.

The applicant whose request to the Zoning Board of Appeals or Village Board requires the use of such professional services shall reimburse the Village the reasonable cost it incurred for the services rendered by its consultants, within fourteen (14) days of transmission of the invoice by the Village or prior to the next meeting, whichever is sooner. The consultants shall bill for their services at the same hourly rate that they normally charge municipal clients. The Village consultants shall include but not be limited to the persons who provide the Village with advice in the fields of engineering, law, planning, traffic, design, and finance.”

The ordinance can be found here.

Editorial note: This Ordinance was approved by a vote of 4-2 with the Village President abstaining. When the meeting recordings are released, they will reveal one trustee who participated remotely was nearly hysterical apparently because she did not believe she had adequate time to conduct her usual “analysis paralysis” on the subject (always with little or no benefit) before voting.

Read Full Post »

The Village Board of Trustees will be conducting their regular monthly meeting this evening beginning at 6:30 PM. Topics on their agenda include:

A copy of their agenda can be viewed and downloaded here.

Related to 5.4 & 10.1:Zoning Board delivers third strike to Little Ducky Farm,” “Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing (AGAIN) tonight,” “News to us…,” “Village Board of Trustees meets tonight,” “’Agricultural Experience’ application meets a similar fate as ‘Agritourism’ did in August,” “Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing tonight,” “Village Board votes down ‘Agritourism as a Special Use’,” “August Board of Trustees meeting recording released,” “Sitting ducks,” “Special Zoning Board of Appeals meeting scheduled Tuesday

Read Full Post »

Our Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing last night regarding the owners of Little Ducky Flower Farm’s latest proposal. After hearing testimony, the Board voted unanimously to deny the applicant’s proposed Village Code text amendment proposal(s).

Related:Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing (AGAIN) tonight,” “News to us…,” “Village Board of Trustees meets tonight,” “’Agricultural Experience’ application meets a similar fate as ‘Agritourism’ did in August,”  Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing tonight,” “Village Board votes down ‘Agritourism as a Special Use’,” “August Board of Trustees meeting recording released,” “Sitting ducks,” “Special Zoning Board of Appeals meeting scheduled Tuesday

Read Full Post »