Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Commodius Maximus’ Category

By Mark Glennon* | Wirepoints

t would be comically hypocritical if weren’t so tragically destructive. Gov. JB Pritzker last week appointed himself co-chair of a new group to save democracy.

It’s called Governors Safeguarding Democracy, formed to counter the incoming Trump Administration and Republican Congress. “What we’re doing is pushing back against increasing threats of autocracy and fortifying the institutions of democracy that our country and our states depend upon,” Pritzker said of the effort. “I’ve said it once, and I’ll say it again: No attempts to restrict the freedoms and opportunities of Illinoisans will be tolerated.”

No governor in memory in any state has thumbed his nose at democratic norms and constitutional rights more consistently and flagrantly than has Pritzker. Examples of how Pritzker earned his reputation as a “hard-left culture warrior who is happy to silence political opponents,” as the Wall Street Journal put it, are too numerous to fully list here, but consider a few:

  • Through 43 consecutive, monthly emergency orders, he suspended ordinary government function and ruled by executive fiat, trampling on a list of constitutional rights, justified through censorship and suppression of opposing scientific views. Similarly, he issued 38 consecutive emergency orders enforcing his personal decisions about assistance and protection for illegal immigrants.
  • He says he wants there to be a legal cause of action against anybody who says something false, which would be a flagrant violation of established First Amendment law.
  • He has signed off on multiple policies and bills that violate constitutional rights to free speech, such as Illinois’ new law banning discussion of political or religious matters at company meetings, now being challenged in federal court. Another example is a Pritzker-signed law attempting to muzzle pro-lifers that was ridiculed by a federal court as “stupid” as well as unconstitutional, prompting Attorney General Kwame Raoul to give up trying to defend the law.
  • He stood aside while his party’s operatives filed lawsuits to keep Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. off the ballot for the presidential election.
  • He meddled in a Republican primary by contributing $24 million that was used, successfully, to achieve the nomination of who Pritzker thought would be a weak opponent, Darren Bailey, in his race for governor.
  • Even the Democratically slanted Illinois courts couldn’t accept a law Pritzker signed earlier this year attempting to knock only Republican candidates off the ballot through a retroactive change in slating procedures. The Illinois Supreme Court in August upheld a lower court ruling that the law flatly violated the constitutional right to vote.
  • Most importantly, nearly every major element of the policy agenda successfully implemented by Pritzker and his supermajority of allies in the General Assembly has no popular support. Thanks to the most gerrymandered election maps in the nation (which Pritzker signed off on in violation of campaign promises), Pritzker’s millions spent on elections and general mastery of the election process, we have an overwhelmingly undemocratic result.

Think about that last one. Poll after poll says Illinoisans want things like school choice, smaller budgets, lower taxes, biological men out of women’s sports, political indoctrination removed from classrooms and a balanced energy policy that includes fossil fuels and rejects the goal of 100% renewable energy.  They want violent criminals prosecuted and they opposed the SAFE-T Act. But Pritzker and his allies have delivered the opposite of all that. Illinois is a moderate state where corrupted democracy has somehow delivered radicalism.

Most relevant to Pritzker’s new effort, the public overwhelmingly opposes sanctuary and welcoming policies for illegal immigrants, which Pritzker intends to use as a centerpiece in “safeguarding democracy.” Even in Chicago, most voters want sanctuary policies ended and the border enforced. Yet Pritzker said, in response to the Republican election sweep, that if “they come for my people they come through me.”

Read more here.

*Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints.

Related: “Pritzker doubles down on rhetoric after Trump’s stronger Illinois performance

Read Full Post »

By Greg Bishop | The Center Square

A leading Illinois House Republican says Gov. J.B. Pritzker needs to stop his “macho man routine” and work with the incoming Trump administration to grow the state’s economy.

Donald Trump didn’t just win the Electoral College last week. He also won the popular vote and Republicans have control of both chambers of Congress. Last week, Gov. J.B. Pritzker said he’ll stand up to Trump.

“To anyone who intends to come take away the freedom and opportunity and digintity of Illinoisans, I would remind you that a happy warrior is still a warrior,” Pritzker said. “You come for my people, you come through me.”

Wednesday, state Rep. Ryan Spain, R-Peoria, said Pritkzer needs to drop the act.

“Offering some sort of gubernatorial macho man moment, saying that Donald Trump needs to come through him to deliver help to the people of Illinois,” Spain said. “Governor, let me be clear. That’s the wrong message.”

Spain said it’s time for Pritzker and Democrats to put down their partisan barriers and work with Republicans to better the state’s economy.

“It’s time to put away the bluster, stop the macho man routine and figure out how we can actually work together,” Spain said.

More here.

Read Full Post »

Scott Stantis/For the Chicago Tribune

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD | Chicago Tribune

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker played the role of designated attack dog within the failed Kamala Harris presidential campaign and he played it with rhetorical flourish. At the Democratic National Convention, where (unlike most others) he used almost his entire speech to criticize Trump, Pritzker called Trump “weird,” “dangerous” and said he was “rich in only one thing: stupidity.”

“He’s a racist, sexist, misogynistic narcissist who wants to use the levers of power to enrich himself and punish anyone who dares speak a word against him,” Pritzker said of Trump on June 9, while President Joe Biden still was the presumptive Democratic nominee.

And that’s among the more polite things the Illinois governor said about the man the nation just elected for a second term as president. He also has described him as “a convicted felon, an adjudicated rapist and a congenital liar.”

Trump, of course, has responded in kind. To wit, also in June, on Truth Social: “Sloppy JB Pritzker, the Rotund Governor from the once great State of Illinois, who makes Chris Christie look like a male model, and whose family wanted him out of the business because he was so pathetic at helping them run it, has presided over the destruction and disintegration of Illinois,” Trump wrote.

Now an inconvenient truth. Trump is to be the next president of the United States with a mandate from the American people and more likely than not sufficient majorities to push through whatever he wishes to enact. Many of those policies will have profound impacts on the people of Illinois.

Now another inconvenient truth. Trump did very well this past election in Illinois.

When all is buttoned up, Harris will almost certainly have beaten Trump in the Land of Lincoln by less than 9 points.

In 2020, by contrast, Biden won Illinois with 58% of the vote to Trump’s 41%, a 17-point margin. In 2016, Hillary Clinton won Illinois with 56% to Trump’s 39%, also roughly a 17-point margin. Illinois remains a reliably blue state, but with a margin now only in the single digits. Trump sliced away nearly half of the prior Democratic presidential candidate’s advantage even though we, like many others, stated many times that his personal behavior and convictions meant that he was no longer qualified to be president.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

By Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner | Wirepoints

Americans demanded change last week. Whether they were voting for Trump or against Harris, their rationale didn’t matter. Less government interference won. So did free speech, border control, law and order, and anti-DEI policies.

The change that shook the nation was visible even in Illinois, perhaps one of the country’s most hostile media and political environments for Trump. Not only did Trump shrink the Dem margin of victory this year to nine percentage points – from 17 points in 2020 and 25 points in 2008 – he also performed better in both Chicago and the suburbs. Illinoisans’ support for Trump grew even as the media and political attacks on him, led notably by Gov. J.B. Pritzker, increased in intensity.

So with 45% of Illinois going for Trump – and Latinos and blacks and virtually every demographic breaking towards him – you would have thought Gov. Pritzker would be chastened, or at least sufficiently introspective enough to hold his tongue until the dust settles.

No way. Just look at the governor’s message to Illinoisans one day after the election:

“This morning, our most vulnerable communities woke up to new uncertainty about their future, scared that their rights will no longer be protected, and unsure whether this nation still stands with them. To women whose healthcare is under even greater threat, to our Black, Brown and AAPI communities, our LGBTQ friends and their families, immigrants and first-generation Americans, our most vulnerable Americans and those with disabilities, to all who have been made to feel unsafe and unwelcome by the Trump campaign and its allies – know that Illinois is your ally. You will always be welcome here.

Straight away, Pritzker has returned to dividing people, not uniting them. Instilling fear, not comfort. Creating demons where none exist.

More here.

Read Full Post »

By Greg Bishop | The Center Square

Veto session begins at the Illinois Statehouse in Springfield Tuesday and last week’s election of Donald Trump may be top of mind.

Gov. J.B. Pritzker expects the Illinois Legislature to work on policies he said would be aimed at countering anything coming from an incoming Trump administration.

In running for the office he ultimately won, Trump promised to close the border, deport violent illegal aliens and end sanctuary cities. With the expectation the U.S. Senate and House will be in Republican control, that could mean dramatic shifts in public policy.

During a post-election news conference Thursday, Pritzker said he’s in talks with his policy advisors and with other governors on what to do around Democrat initiatives.

“So we’re gathering, I would call it, a list of things that we may need to address, maybe not during veto session, but maybe, it can be done in the new year,” Pritzker said. “But suffice to say that we have a lot of work that we’re looking at doing.”

Pritzker said some of the issues that may surface either during veto session or early next year could include reproductive rights, health care and immigration.

“I’m eager to get back to our Capitol and resume the work of the people,” said House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, D-Hillside. “We’ve gotten big things done in the 103rd General Assembly, and I’m looking forward to closing out this session on a positive note for Illinoisans.”

State Rep. Adam Niemerg, R-Dieterich, expects there to be “a lot of meltdowns” from Democrats during veto session.

“You’re going to see the Democrats really give a lot of floor speeches, they’re going to file a lot of legislation on the immigration issue,” Niemerg told The Center Square.

Niemerg said the election results show him that undocumented immigration is a losing issue.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

The Illinois state flag is displayed on a building along North La Salle Street in the Loop, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. | Pat Nabong/Sun-Times

By Kade Heather | Chicago Sun*Times

Residents in seven downstate counties voted in Tuesday’s election to explore the idea of breaking away from Illinois to form a new state.

The counties join a growing number of other right-leaning downstate counties that have approved similar nonbinding measures in recent election years. The movement comes as residents’ distaste for the left-leaning policies pushed through the Democrat-led Illinois General Assembly has also grown.

Republican President-elect Donald Trump won the majority of votes in each of the seven counties that voted in favor of exploring secession in this year’s election.

The seven counties that voted to consider separating from Illinois are:

  • Calhoun County (passed with 76% of the vote)
  • Clinton County (passed with 71% of the vote)
  • Green County (passed with 74% of the vote)
  • Iroquois County (passed with 72% of the vote)
  • Jersey County (passed with 73% of the vote)
  • Madison County (passed with 56% of the vote)
  • Perry County (passed with 71% of the vote)

The likelihood of any county seceding from Illinois is extremely low. Any formal request to secede would require approval from the Illinois General Assembly and the U.S. Congress.

More here.

Read Full Post »

By JEREMY GORNEROLIVIA OLANDERADRIANA PÉREZ  and KARINA ATKINS  | Chicago Tribune

Democrats were poised to defend their supermajority in the Illinois General Assembly on Tuesday but Republicans appeared set to prevent the opposition party from expanding their control.

Democrats, who enjoyed a significant funding advantage over Republicans in this election, thanks to billionaire Gov. JB Pritzker and other sources, were holding on to several seats targeted by the GOP, according to unofficial results in an election where all 118 state House seats and 24 of the 59 state Senate seats were in play.

“Our historic Democratic majority will continue to advance our vision for opportunity, dignity, and freedom for all,” House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, Hillside Democrat, said in a statement Tuesday night.

Several races remained undecided as ballots continued to be counted late Tuesday.

In the northwest Chicago suburbs, Republican Rep. Martin McLaughlin held a slight edge over Democratic challenger Maria Peterson, a former labor attorney from North Barrington, with 91% of the estimated vote total reporting.

Just after 11 p.m., votes for the two candidates were almost evenly split, according to AP.

Peterson said her campaign will wait for all mail-in ballots to come in.

Democratic campaign organizations backed Peterson with more than $300,000 in in-kind contributions, campaign finance records show.

Peterson’s campaign spent nearly five times more than McLaughlin’s during the last quarter, the records show.

Read more here.

Editorial note: As of 5 AM today with all four counties in Barrington Hills reporting a 100% count, Martin McLaughlin received 28,487 votes to Maria Peterson’s 27,563 for a difference of 924 votes.

Read Full Post »

Photo courtesy Maria for 52 Facebook page

By Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner | Wirepoints

On Tuesday’s Nov. 5 ballot there’s a nonbinding referendum that asks voters if they want the state to tax millionaires a 3% surcharge on the money they make over and above $1 million. In exchange for agreeing to target millionaires, Illinois voters can expect property tax relief, the referendum reads, though the referendum is noncommittal as to how much relief, if any, it would actually provide. The state says the 3% surcharge on millionaires will give the government about $4.5 billion in new revenues.

For the state to provide property tax relief, however, it would have to actually take some of those new tax revenues and commit them to property tax relief. And that’s where Illinoisans should be highly skeptical, we warned a week ago: “Given the upcoming budget deficits…there won’t be any money left over for tax relief.”

Sure enough, it only took a few days for Gov. J.B. Pritzker and his budget office to announce that billion-dollar deficits are on their way.

Pritzker’s team on Friday released its five-year budget forecast and said it expects a whopping $3.2 billion deficit for next fiscal year (2025-2026), a $4.3 billion deficit for the following year, and $5 billion-plus deficits in each of the years 2028 through 2030.

Those deficits effectively swallow up the revenues of the “millionaire’s tax,” leaving little to nothing for property tax relief. The administration would have to raise income taxes by another $4 billion-plus to provide both property tax relief and cover the deficits. How far down into middle-income brackets would Illinois politicians have to hike income tax rates to get that all money?

Not only do the above deficits make the referendum a farce, but they are a major contradiction to the praise the governor has heaped on himself for managing the state’s finances over the last few years, in particular during COVID.

How can the wheels be coming off the bus now, when the national economy is humming along, interest rates are going down, and the governor has managed to “balance budgets”?

There are two big answers to that question. The first one is that Pritzker never actually fixed any problems. No spending reforms. No pension reforms. No tax relief. None.

The second answer to that question is that the governor and his Democratic supermajority used the windfall revenues from the covid bailouts to pay down the state’s bills, and then poured the rest into new spending (more on that below).

The covid bailouts were massive. More than $70 billion was given in loans and grants to businesses. Illinoisans got $30 billion in stimulus checks. State and local governments received more than $30 billion. Billions more went to health care and a host of other programs. All that money also had the knock-on effect of supercharging the state’s tax revenues.

It was all that money, and not Pritzker’s efforts, that covered up all of Illinois’ structural spending problems. Now the covid money is gone and reality is back.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

If the projections hold true, Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker could face difficult financial decisions, from increasing taxes to cutting spending. | Zubaer Khan/Sun-Times

By Dave McKinney | WBEZ CHICAGO

The relative financial calm that has marked Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker’s six years in office may soon be coming to a close as his administration Friday forecast a more than $3 billion budget shortfall for the next fiscal year.

That marks a major departure from years when the state would post budget surpluses on his watch and presents the governor with a painful set of potential solutions at the same time he contemplates whether to seek a third term in 2026.

Without new revenue or spending cuts, Pritzker’s budget office estimates a $3.17 billion budget shortfall at the end of Fiscal Year 2026, which would be mid-2026 as the gubernatorial election is in full swing.

To confront the problem, it’s not clear whether the governor and Democratic supermajorities in the House and Senate would favor tax or fee increases; spending cuts; delays in paying state bills; use of the state’s $2.2 billion rainy day fund; or a combination of those choices.

“While a daunting challenge to balance spending pressures in the face of a flat revenue outlook, the governor remains committed to taking steps to further improve Illinois’ fiscal position and address any potential budgetary shortfalls that may arise – as has been done every year since he took office in 2019,” the governor’s budget office said in a statement attached to the forecasts. “The ability to fund new programs will be severely limited.”

Republicans pounced on the new set of budget numbers.

This guy’s spending like a drunk sailor for the first six years of his governorship. Here we are,” said state Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, ranking Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Rose said the appetite of Illinois taxpayers to shoulder tax or fee increases is “about zero.”

“But that doesn’t mean that the supermajority, progressive, left Democrats won’t do that anyway,” Rose said. “I mean, have you talked to anybody going to the grocery store recently?”

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

“We haven’t had population loss.” It’s a claim Gov. JB Pritzker and his allies have made before, and it’s preposterous. Unfortunately, they get away with it because the media and many of our supposed watchdogs let them.

By Mark Glennon and John Klingner | Wirepoints

Deputy Illinois Governor Andy Manar said this last week:

We haven’t had population loss. There have never been more people living in the State of Illinois than there is today. In the census there’s a thing called the post enumeration survey (PES) that shows that Illinois gained population. It’s a correction. and it’s a real correction from the Census Bureau…. Illinois is not losing people, it is gaining people.

It’s a claim Gov. JB Pritzker and his allies have made before.

It’s preposterous.

Manar has no basis for his claims and overwhelming evidence says, instead, that Illinois has lost population year after year, probably a decade. Making matters worse, Manar’s claim was blindly accepted by Better Government Association President David Greising who moderated the panel where Manar made the claim.

Here are the facts:

For starters, the ten-year census on which Manar relied is four years old now. Not only does he ignore what’s happened since April 1, 2020, the census effective date, but his claim of “never been more people living in the State of Illinois” isn’t true either. The decennial census showed a small loss of 18,124 people over the decade, but the flight problem did not become apparent until about 2014. That’s when annual census estimates, as well as other evidence, began to show the downturn, continuing every year thereafter. Illinois population therefore probably peaked about then, not now as Manar claims.

Further, April 2020 is about when violent crime skyrocketed, including the 2020 riots in Chicago that summer, which one can reasonably assume contributed to flight from the state. Direct evidence of what has happened since April 2020 indicates accelerating flight. For that, we can start with the Census Bureau’s annual estimates, which show further decline each year since 2020. We lost a net 100,016 people in 2021, and another 107,826 in 2022 and a further loss of 32,826 people in 2023.

As for the Post Enumerations Survey (PES) Manar focused on, no, it does not officially alter the results of the 2020 decennial census, which showed the small 18,124 loss. The PES is a survey conducted after every census to attempt to identify potential errors. It’s based on answers from just 0.1% of American households, which the census says is too small to make any official changes with.

Finally, the Census Bureau recently announced it would do a one-time adjustment of Illinois’ population based on an undercount identified by the Post-Census Group Quarters Review (PCGQR). The change adds 46,400 Illinoisans, which the census says it will use to adjust future, annual estimates. That tiny adjustment hardly dents the far bigger losses since 2020.

Beyond Census Bureau numbers, we can look at IRS migration data. The IRS numbers are precise because they know exactly how many people file returns and where they are moving to and from. We’ve documented those numbers year after year. For 2022, the most recent year reported by the IRS, Illinois netted a loss of 87,000 residents, with 175,000 moving into Illinois from other states and 262,000 moving out. Since 2000, Illinois has lost a net 1.6 million people to net out-migration, according to the IRS data.

How about moving van numbers? Headlines have been routine for years about numbers from moving companies showing Illinois among the nation’s biggest losers. The most recent annual study from United Van Lines, for example, says Illinois had the highest percentage of moves being outbound: 61%.

When Manar made his population claims, Greising’s response was “Oh, okay, sorry…. Okay, Okay.” Shame on Greising. The facts laid out above have been long published by many sources and it’s inexcusable for him to kowtow to conflicting government propaganda, which he is supposed to be challenging.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »