Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Audio Recordings’ Category

The Village has released audio recordings from last Monday’s special Village Board meeting.  We understand the meeting was well attended by residents, but the same cannot be said of elected officials.

Trustees Gohl and Harrington were absent from the brief meeting, as were outgoing Trustees Meroni and Selman.  Once newly elected Trustees Croll, Maison and Cecola took their oaths of office, a quorum of the Board was then present, and the meeting was called to order.

Two residents made public comments.  Trustee Messer was then given a plaque and commendation for his years of service to residents by President McLaughlin, and all present gave him a round of applause.  Plaques were also prepared for former Trustees Meroni and Selman and presumably they will pick up them up at a later date.

The Board then voted on Trustee assignments for oversight of the various committees and commissions made up of appointed residents, as well as approve a new President Pro-Tem.

To access the menu of edited audio recordings from the meeting, click here.

Read Full Post »

Audio recordings from last month’s regular Village Board meeting are available for review.

The entire public session of the meeting lasted just over an hour, compared to recent meetings lasting nearly four times as long.  We understand that attendance was lower than usual at the brief meeting as well, and only two residents voiced their public comments.

The first resident to speak also happens to chair the Heritage and Environs Committee.  She expressed her gratitude to Trustees Meroni and Selman for their service to the Village, opined on the April election results, and voiced her expectations for decorum in future post-elections Board meetings. Her comments can be heard here.

The second person to speak chose to use her time at the podium to pay tribute to the recently departed Village Clerk, Dolores Trandel.  Her personal comments can be heard here.

When it came time for the Board to discuss their agenda for the evening, the partisan bickering many have come to expect was noticeably lacking. Even the discussion leading to a vote to not pay a portion of the legal bills from Bond Dickson for yet another month was uncharacteristically subdued, but that may have been due to the presence of a reporter from the Daily Herald.

Trustee Meroni repeated the 2015 Village budgeted road improvement plans centered in the McHenry County portions of Barrington Hills during her Roads & Bridges report including:

  • Meadow Hill Rd from Fox Hunt Lane to Spring Creek Rd
  • Haegers Bend Rd from County Line to Chapel Rd, and
  • Plum Tree Rd from Ridge Rd to the western Village limits

Once Meroni’s report was concluded, President McLaughlin asked Dan Strahan of Gewalt Hamilton to look into when Cook County plans to address significant road surface issues on Brinker Road.  Trustee Gohl also asked Strahan to look into the status of Otis Road. Both roadways continue to be problematic for residents wishing to avoid recurring potholes, and the recording of that request for information can be heard here.

The Board continued their discussion of an extension of the current BACOG lease for terms of three to five years.  Trustees appeared to have no issues with extending the lease, but an “out clause” for the extended lease being considered was mentioned.

During the Administration portion of the meeting, President McLaughlin proposed a resolution honoring the work of Dolores Trandel during her years of service to the Village.  The motion passed unanimously followed by applause from attendees.

The link to the edited audio recording segment menu from the April meeting can be accessed here.

Read Full Post »

Audio recordings from last month’s regular Village Board meeting are available for review.  Since the meeting lasted nearly four and a half hours, we’ll cover the main topics of interest to readers.

Nine residents spoke during the public comment portion of the meeting.  The comments were evenly split between the topics of 911 consolidation and the politicization of the LeCompte Kalaway Cup event special use permit extension.

During the one-hour finance discussion, payment of a portion of the temporary Village Counsel’s fees was again denied, though no Trustee could or would profess to any issues with the services provided by either Patrick Bond or Mary Dickson.  It should be noted the fees outstanding due to Bond Dickson are now approaching $60,000.

Trustee Harrington read a prepared “ten reasons” list for not paying our legal bills, and cast blame once again on President McLaughlin.  We believe anyone who needs ten reasons obviously doesn’t have one legitimate one to stand on, thus the unnecessary list.

What Harrington repeatedly neglects to mention is that McLaughlin allowed him and other Board members to vet more than ten other law firms for seating as permanent Village Counsel in a failed selection process that led to no clear-cut choice for recommendation.  Furthermore, since that time, neither Harrington, nor any other Trustee, has recommended any other qualified firm to be considered by the full Board, yet he and others balk at paying a temporary firm providing quality, timely services.

The ongoing discussions of 911 consolidation consumed nearly the entire one hour and twenty minute Public Safety portion of the March meeting, concluding with a vote to migrate the village’s 911 services to QuadCom.  Though it is a long recording, we recommend any readers who are concerned about migration listen to it, since many fictional tales circulating through the Village during the recent political campaign were dispelled.

Trustees Gohl, Meroni and Selman voted against consolidation despite reassurances from not only the consulting group engaged by the Village, but also our own police chief, Rich Semelsberger.  The vote can be heard here.

With regard to the LeCompte Kalaway Cup special use permit extension that was “killed” at the March Zoning Board of Appeals meeting, the Board passed the extension by a unanimous vote.  The recording of that discussion can be heard here.

The topic of extending the lease agreement with BACOG (Barrington Area Council of Governments) was also discussed, but not voted on, during the Health, Environment, Buildings and Grounds section, despite the fact the current BACOG lease doesn’t expire until the summer of 2016.

According Janet Agnoletti, Executive Director of BACOG, the Village of Barrington is wishing to provide them space in the “White House” currently under renovation on Main Street in downtown Barrington.  While this location might be better suited and more centrally located, Agnoletti expressed her desire to continue renting office space at our Village Hall under a multi-year lease extension for the 220 square feet they currently occupy.  The recording of that discussion can be accessed here.

It is our sincere hope that, with the elections behind us, these Board meetings will become more tolerable for residents to either attend or listen to in these recordings.  There has been entirely too much unnecessary, time-consuming political rhetoric heating the McArthur Room at Village Hall for the last year, and it’s high time this practice comes to an end.

The link to the edited audio recording segment menu from the March meeting can be accessed here.

Read Full Post »

The Village has released recordings from the March 9th special Village Board meeting called by Trustees Harrington and Messer to continue discussions of 911 consolidation and legal matters pertaining to a recent lawsuit filed against the Village.  A link to the menu of edited recording segments can be accessed here.

Trustee Harrington presented what he believed the next steps should be in order for he, and some others on the Board, to be more comfortable with definitively voting on 911 consolidation.  With the exception of Trustee Gohl, a motion was passed to pay additional consulting fees to obtain more information to be discussed at the regular March meeting.

Discussion of special counsel selection for legal and insurance purposes to address the pending lawsuit was moved to executive session at the request of Harrington and Messer.  Before the public meeting broke, however, President McLaughlin point out the fact that he appointed Patrick Bond to be special counsel assigned to all matters related to horse boarding in May of 2014.  He then moved public comment up so the dozens of residents in attendance could have an opportunity to speak before the closed executive session began.

Five residents took advantage of this opportunity.  Three were particularly pointed in their opinions of some of the current Village Board members, and one of them raised some eyebrows with his direct candidness.

Speaker number four questioned why an additional attorney for the lawsuit is being discussed when we don’t pay our current one.  He described some on the Board to be a “cancer on our Village” and opined if they were good people, they would resign.   His brief, but very pointed comments can be heard here.

Read Full Post »

Audio recordings from last month’s regular Village Board meeting are available for review.  Since the meeting lasted about four and a half hours, we’ll do our best to summarize the highlights and lowlights from the meeting.

Ten people spoke during public comment, although for some reason the recording from the eighth speaker is not available.

The first speaker informed attendees of the upcoming roadside trash pickup in April and then went on to plead that some Board members put politics aside and pay Patrick Bond, temporary Village Counsel for the services he’s been providing to the Board.  We agree, and his comments can be heard here.

The fifth speaker brought up her observation that there is a “substantial similarity” between the SOS Party’s campaign logo to that of the Village of Barrington Hills copyrighted logo used in Village communications, and she questioned if this was legal under copyright law.

She also expressed concern that the use of the SOS Party logo in campaign media might confuse residents and possibly could infer some form of endorsement by the Village in the SOS Party campaign.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two logos she referred to:

Save Open Space Logo

Save Open Space Logo

Barrington Hills Logo

Barrington Hills Logo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Her comments can be heard here, and again, we recommend readers listen to all who commented.

During the Finance discussion of the monthly bills for payment, payment to Patrick Bond was again denied via a motion by Trustee Harrington.  Trustees Gohl, Messer, Meroni and Selman then approved his motion in the political lockstep we’ve come to expect from most on this Village Board.   In a prior vote, Trustee Gohl had voted in favor of Bond’s payment.

The Roads & Bridges discussion followed with some disheartening news about the backlog of road resurfacing in Barrington Hills.  It was questioned if the goal of repaving 3.2 miles per year was even attainable.

History disproves this since in 2013 3.15 miles of roads were resurfaced once legal expenses were dramatically curtailed. Nonetheless, that is likely too little too late, and though discussions will continue at this month’s Board meeting, it’s likely some amount of tax increase will have to be passed on to residents.

During the Public Safety portion of the meeting, as previously reported, Trustees voted not to consolidate 911 Dispatch with QuadCom by a vote of 4-2, with President McLaughlin abstaining.  Trustee Harrington stated his priorities were safety first and financials of the consolidation second.  Later, when explaining his vote against consolidation, he stated he’d like to see more numbers before deciding.  That’s a bit contradictory.

Next came the Building and Zoning discussion and action beginning with a motion to override the veto of the LeCompte/Anderson Horse Boarding Ordinance.  Prior to the vote, President McLaughlin weighed in on his concern over passing the Ordinance based on the legal exposure it would likely create for the Village.

As we’ve recently learned, his concerns were warranted.  According to the Cook County Circuit Court website (click here to view the record), a complaint was filed against the Village just four days after Trustees Gohl, Harrington, Messer, Meroni and Selman voted to override the veto, and now a special Village Board meeting is scheduled for Monday to discuss a defense against the complaint.

During this same session, Trustee Messer motioned to set compensation for the Special Counsel named by President McLaughlin to review the proceedings that led to the LeCompte/Anderson Horse Boarding Ordinance at $0.  Trustee Meroni seconded, and the motion passed 5-2 in what, unfortunately, has become an all too familiar partisan vote.

The Administration portion of the meeting actually began at the start of the meeting since President McLaughlin moved it forward.  Richard Semelsberger, a 26-year veteran of the Barrington Police Department, was promoted from acting Police Chief to a permanent appointment with a unanimous vote.   Officer Joseph Colditz was then promoted to the post of Deputy Chief, and we congratulate both gentlemen on their well-deserved promotions.

The status of an Ordinance passed in January which changed the authority to appoint special counsel, from being solely at the discretion of the Village President to the Village Board in its entirety, was then discussed.  Trustee Messer sponsored the measure, and it passed by a partisan 5-2 vote.

President McLaughlin vetoed the Ordinance, and went on to cite Illinois Statutes that prohibit such a change without prior passage of a referendum by residents of the Village.  As it turns out, what Trustees Gohl, Harrington, Messer, Meroni and Selman approved in their proposed Ordinance at the January Village Board meeting is unconstitutional under State Law since it would essentially change our form of government.

Politically charged banter was peppered throughout the meeting.  Most of it emanated from four Trustees clearly supporting the SOS Party, but honestly, is a public meeting of our elected officials really the forum for this?

We don’t think so and many agree.  We understand even some SOS supporters in the room that night were taken aback by what they witnessed.

The link to the menu of edited recording segments from the meeting can be found here.

Read Full Post »

The Village has released recordings from last Monday evening’s Village Board meeting.  We understand an overflow crowd of residents witnessed what ultimately deteriorated to an “R-Rated” display of political theater near the conclusion of the three-hour meeting.

Twelve residents spoke during public comment.  Eleven of them were given due respect from the board beginning with the first speaker who called for an investigation of President McLaughlin’s actions in office.  The speaker was met with no interruption, and in fact, was acknowledged with a respectful “thank you” from President McLaughlin at the end.

To listen to the comments of the speaker, who just happens to be the Campaign Chair for Trustees Meroni and Selman’s SOS Party, click here.

However, the third speaker was interrupted so loudly and frequently by Trustee Messer that the chair was forced to suggest he would need to leave the room if he could not maintain decorum.  Even Trustee Meroni stated “Let him go on continuing to make a fool of himself” when Messer continued on even after the speaker was done.  A direct link to that exchange can be found here.

As always, we recommend readers listen to all comments from residents who took the time to attend and contribute to the discussion.

After public comment, three representatives from ComEd provided an update on the planned installations of Smart Meters in Barrington Hills beginning in May.  Their presentation can be heard here.

During the finance discussion, Trustee Harrington once again objected to payments to Patrick Bond, temporary Village counsel, despite the fact that neither he, nor any other Trustee, has recommended a replacement for Bond who continues to gladly answer legal questions from every board member.  Bond’s billing was denied by five trustees, and according to recorded minutes, he has not been paid since August or September of last year, yet he continues to serve the board dutifully and without hesitation.

The vote on the 911 consolidation ordinance was tabled by Trustee Gohl due to public comment that evening and because of pending insurance information from QuadCom.  His motion passed with only one nay vote from Trustee Meroni.

During her Roads & Bridges report, Trustee Meroni stated that she was unprepared to present a mid-range plan beyond the current year to catch up on the 4.5 mile backlog of road resurfacing, but committed to present one at the February board meeting.

Trustee Messer presented an ordinance he had drafted repealing the code allowing the Village President to appoint special counsel.  Many, including The Observer, viewed Messer’s draft as ambiguous in scope and could have also been used to take the power to appoint the Village Attorney away from the office of the Village President.  After much wrangling, Messer finally agreed to change the dubious language, and it passed by a 5-2 vote.

During the Board of Health report and discussion, Trustee Harrington and Bob Kosin gained support from the board to allow for more extensive periodic testing of well water from public locations required to do so by law, such as churches, the Riding Center and the Village Hall well.  We commend the members of the Board of Health for taking on this initiative, since nearly every resident has no alternative to well water.

Finally, after nearly two and half hours the much-anticipated report on Administration that had attracted most of the crowd was presented.

President McLaughlin stated that he had vetoed the Anderson-LeCompte commercial horse boarding amendment on January 6th, and then proceeded to provide a very reasonable explanation regarding why he exercised his right, as can be heard here.  Despite this veto, the same five Trustees who voted to approve the amendment can override the veto at the next Board meeting.

McLaughlin then spoke to his initiation of a special counsel review into the manner in which the Anderson-LeCompte boarding amendment was handled and allegations of impropriety brought forward by residents.  That recording can be found here.

No sooner than the President finished, Trustee Harrington interrupted the agenda with his own call for an investigation in a lengthy prepared statement mirroring the comments of the SOS Party chair earlier in the evening.

Harrington, who recently donated $10,000 to Trustees Meroni and Selman’s SOS Party, accused McLaughlin of political motivation in his call for a special investigation regarding the horse boarding amendment and cited a laundry list of anything he could name, from appointments made by McLaughlin that adhered to Village Code and the Open Meetings Act, to allegations of impropriety in conducting the annual Village “party” known as the “Hills are Alive Heritage Fest.”

shocked_womanDespite the disrespectful interruptions by fellow Trustees throughout the meeting, particularly from Messer, McLaughlin kept his composure and continued to maintain order in the crowded MacArthur room as best he could.  He never objected any investigation Harrington proposed, but his assuredness clearly got to Messer who finally burst out with something we will not reprint in this publication, though it can be heard here, but readers are advised it is NSFW (not suitable for work).

Earlier in the evening, Trustee Messer had expressed disappointment when he reported that only five permits had been issued in 2014 for new home construction.  Frankly, given the frequent negative publicity Barrington Hills has endured for nearly a decade over cell towers, lighting ordinances and multiple failed attempts to address horse boarding in our “equestrian” branded community, conflicts of interest on two boards and his precedent-setting drop of the “F-Bomb” in a public meeting, we’re pleased anyone is building here at all.

The link to the full menu of edited recordings from the meeting can be accessed here.

Read Full Post »

The Village has released edited recordings from the Roads & Bridges Committee meeting held on January 20th.  This is the first time such a meeting has been announced in advance on the Village calendar as well as recorded for residents to review.

Three public comments were made at the beginning of the meeting.  The second was not complimentary, however, and the speaker expressed her lack of trust in the committee and advocated for the termination of Gewalt Hamilton.  Those comments can be heard here.

The menu of topical audio recordings, including updates on the progress (or lack thereof) of removing FAU designations of Village roads as well as the status of the significant backlog of road resurfacing, can be accessed here.

Read Full Post »

911 Call CenterThere’s been a lot of outreach lately from Village Hall to residents regarding Public Safety Committee meetings where 911 dispatch consolidation has been discussed.  Three such meetings have occurred since September, in addition to at least two Village Board meetings where the Board of Trustees have also discussed the matter.

Turnout for these meetings has been very low.  Perhaps residents are resting from the fast and frequent pace of Zoning Board public hearings that ended only last month.  Maybe residents understand and approve the move to consolidate.  Or, maybe people didn’t have time to read the 145-page “Public Safety Answering Point” report in the midst of the holidays, and who can blame them?

We’ve read the report, as well as other resources available, and have come up with some frequently asked questions (FAQ’s) we’ve heard from residents.  They are:

Why has the Village been exploring 911 consolidation?

This is an initiative that now-retired Police Chief Michael Murphy had been advocating for some time.  Last year, he convinced the Village Board to investigate opportunities for improvements for 911 services through an experienced independent third-party consulting group.

What are the reasons for consolidating 911 services?   

Barrington Hills is one of the very last municipalities left that has not consolidated.  Barrington, South Barrington, East Dundee, Carpentersville, Algonquin and many other communities went with consolidation years and decades ago.  Keeping up with changing technology demands and investments becomes a very costly proposition for a single community like ours, and by joining with other communities, those costs are dramatically lowered and shared by all participants.

We also have only one 911 dispatcher on duty at any given time.  When that one dispatcher is unavailable, 911 calls bounce to another call center.  Given response mandates coming from Springfield, we may have to increase staffing sometime in the future to meet guidelines set forth by the state.

Is this all about lowering costs?

No.  Cost is certainly an incentive, but the safety of residents appears to be the primary concern.

How would residents’ safety be improved through consolidation?

Our current 911 dispatch center only handles Village Police calls.  Any emergency calls for ambulance or fire response are transferred to other call centers for response after information is taken.

This transfer process can take time and sometimes could cause delays, and according to the Barrington Countryside Fire Protection District, a fire doubles in size every minute.

Further, our dispatchers are not trained to deal with the immediate needs of a caller when it comes to a heart attack or other life threatening situations.  They must transfer the caller to another 911 center for immediate assistance until help arrives.

If consolidation occurs, will there be no one left manning the village police station dispatch center?

No.  Two shifts will be covered by existing personnel to handle non-emergency and administrative calls, in addition to walk-ins needing assistance.    

What is “QuadCom” and why are they being considered?

QuadCom is a 911 call center that has been actively serving many of the surrounding communities, in some cases, for decades.  They’ve serviced South Barrington since 1991 for police dispatch, East Dundee for police and fire departments, and Carpentersville for police and fire, among other member communities.

Unlike most 911 centers, QuadCom is a membership only service group.  We would have to apply for membership among the other nine members.  Once a member, Barrington Hills would have a seat at the board and have a vote in any future technology and staffing matters.

Also, the Executive Director, Beth Heitkamp, actually began her career in 1984 in our own Barrington Hills 911 center under then Chief Lamb’s tenure, and she seems to have an undiminished passion for the people of Barrington Hills.

Are QuadCom’s dispatchers ‘better’ than our current staff?

From the standpoint of dedication to their jobs, the answer would have to be no from what we’ve heard.  Beth Heitkamp has repeatedly praised our dispatchers in public meetings, and some may ultimately be employed by QuadCom should the consolidation be approved.

The most noteworthy difference in our minds is that QuadCom’s staffs are mostly, if not all CPR-certified, meaning from the first point of contact they can assist the caller in the event of a heart attack from the time between the call and when trained EMT specialists arrive on the scene.  Our current dispatchers are not CPR-certified.

Additionally, QuadCom dispatchers stay on the line with residents until emergency personnel arrive at the scene, instead of passing the call to another 911 center, thus keeping the residents apprised of what is occurring and when.

Some village addresses are hard to find, so how will an outside dispatcher know where to direct responders?

Both Barrington Hills and QuadCom have digital mapping systems at their disposal.  In QuadCom’s case, they have multiple systems available which are tied to land line and cell phone locations.

Fortunately in the case of Barrington Hills, we have very experienced police officers who know where exactly they need to go with a simple address, and the same can be said for the fire districts serving Barrington Hills.  Nonetheless, any new dispatchers will participate in “drive along” education with police officers for visual training.

Do we need to consolidate now to a new call center?   

No, but politicians in Springfield are talking about requiring consolidation at some point.  If this occurs, our options might be limited instead of having a choice as we do now.

Certain “legacy” software and hardware at our current dispatch center will need to be upgraded this year, and that expense will require a significant six-figure investment of taxpayer dollars to achieve.  If a consolidation decision is made after this investment, it is unknown if this can be recouped through resale.

Are there financial benefits to consolidation?

Yes.  As with any consolidation, there are always economies realized by a joining a common group with a shared goal, which in this case is enhanced emergency response to residents.

After the initial membership investment to QuadCom is recouped, the average cost annually for 911 dispatch services to taxpayers will decrease from $168 per capita to under $50.  This equates to a projected $6 million savings over 15 years to taxpayers.

Based on our review of all the information that has been presented on the topic, including the recently released recordings of the Public Safety Committee meeting,  we believe that 911 consolidation will benefit Village residents in a number of ways, and this move does not come without endorsement and praise from neighboring communities.

Still, there are a few detractors, but their arguments seem more partisan based than substantive.  However, most of their concerns seemed to have been allayed at the recent Public Safety Committee meetings.

Our Village Board will take this matter up again during this evening’s regular board meeting.  We hope that politics is put aside and that a constructive dialog can occur which will result in improving public safety in Barrington Hills.

–     The Observer

Read Full Post »

220 LogoThe Barrington Area Unit School District 220 board voted Wednesday morning at an emergency meeting to approve the purchase of 20.75 acres of land adjacent to Barrington High School for $2.35 million.

The acquisition nets the district 7.7 usable acres from Flint Creek Crossing, a commercial subdivision, and 13.8 acres of the Flint Creek Conservation Area west of Hart Road.

The board voted 4-1 in favor of purchasing the land. The lone dissenter was Chris Guyer, who said he was not comfortable with the restrictions that Flint Creek officials placed on the land.

Read more of the Daily Herald report here.  A map depicting the location of the newly purchased Barrington property by District 220 can be viewed here.

The Barrington Hills Village Board discussed and approved restrictions for future uses of the land at their December 18th meeting prior to District 220’s vote to purchase the property.  The recording of that discussion can be found here.

Read Full Post »

Recordings from the regular monthly Village Board meeting are available for review.  A link to the menu of subject areas covered can be accessed here.

The four-hour meeting began with eleven public comments from residents and guests.

The fourth person to speak, who is a member of the Board of Health, had some choice words for the trustee liaison to that board, as well as comments regarding the conflict of interest on the part of some on the Village Board when it came to their refusal to recuse themselves from voting on the Anderson amendment and about voting irregularities in the 2013 election when former residents voted in Barrington Hills. Those comments can be found here.

A few other speakers also shared concerns over conflicts of members of both boards, as well as a variety of other topics.  As always we encourage readers to listen to recordings of all who came to participate.

Notable items discussed and approved by the board after comment include:

  • Discussion of financial opportunities presented by current low interest rates to finance escalating long-term pension obligations compared to a higher rate of return on pension investments resulting in a decreased future costs to taxpayers
  • Denial of yet another month’s payment to Patrick Bond, temporary Special Counsel, led by Trustees Harrington and Messer, despite Bond providing significant legal advice throughout the meeting (specifically as it relates to the three horse boarding amendments voted down by the Zoning Board)
  • Roads & Bridges meetings will now be held monthly and be open to the public with agendas posted in advance of the meetings
  • A vote to submit an application for membership to QuadCom for enhanced 911 services based on a feasibility study and public meetings prior to a Village Board decision to migrate 911 services to keep pace with future increases manpower, technology needs and associated costs, while retaining staff at Village Hall for non-emergency calls was tabled. President McLaughlin and others trustees felt that more resident involvement and communication needed to take place before a final decision is made by the board.  That discussion can be heard here for those unfamiliar with this subject.
  • An amended special use permit for a polo field and indoor arena located at 170 Old Sutton Rd was unanimously approved, after Board discussion which followed the recusal and exit from the MacArthur Room of Trustee Messer, whose firm represented the applicant
  • Discussion and vote, per Village Code, had to occur for closure on the Drury, Hammond and Elders (sic) horse boarding text amendment proposals dismissed by the Zoning Board, and we recommend readers listen to this recording segment beginning here
  • Further explanation of what CMAP is attempting to do with regard to regional transportation was provided by Bob Kosin during the Plan Commission report and can be heard here, and
  • A two to five partisan vote not to appoint Bond Dickson as permanent counsel to the Village Board as can be heard here

Many other topics were discussed during the meeting, and we recommend readers consult the original agenda for guidance on where to find those discussions in the recordings.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »