Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘SOS Party’ Category

No BikesA new website was announced in a mailer that arrived in residents’ mailboxes recently that sheds light on the true origin of planned bike lanes, and the widened roads to accommodate them, on Barrington Hills roads.

This “Bombshell” mailer (aptly named as it turns out) states, “A recent FOIA Request unearthed documents showing the truth behind the Bike Lane Scandal in Barrington Hills.” The website documents a timeline of the actual events leading up to the proposed bike lanes beginning in 2011 as a result of actions by the former Village President, and then newly elected Trustee, Patty Meroni, that led concerned residents to protest last year.

To visit this highly revealing website, click here.

Read Full Post »

Too Many SignsThere are too many signs in Barrington Hills.  Drive down most roads, and it will be obvious.  Too many election signs.  One next to the other and then another and another.  What’s worse than that?  There are too many “for sale” signs.  They signal a broad sense of dissatisfaction and a desire to get out.  This may or may not be true, but the signs say to the world and to us that we are in trouble.

The truth is that it has become far too noisy in Barrington Hills.  The noise comes not from the sounds of traffic or congestion but from one group of voices trying to drown out the other.  And we are all to blame, including this publication.

There are too many blogs and political parties.  Their names are an allegory for something that has been lost or diminished:  “Save Horse Boarding in Barrington Hills,” “Don’t Change Barrington Hills,” “Save Open Space,” and “Preserve Barrington Hills.”  But what have we really lost?

There have been too many lawsuits:  Iatarola, Duda, Sears, LeCompte 1, LeCompte 2, and now a fresh lawsuit challenging the Village’s handling of its own horse boarding laws.  These lawsuits are also a sign that we have lost control of our problems and now must ask faraway judges, strangers to our Village, to decide what we were unable to resolve ourselves.

We talk too much about lawyers and legal fees and government investigations.  We have had too many controversies:  cell phone towers; exterior lighting (remember the HALO signs?); horse boarding; bike lanes; disconnection; 911.  The list and the signs go on and on.

There have been too many headlines portraying our small Village as the epicenter of wealthy-folks’ petulant controversies:  “Horse feud splitting Barrington Hills”; “Residents, cyclists feud over Barrington Hills roads”; “AG’s office reviews ex-mayor’s Barrington Hills appointments”; “Appellate court sides with Barrington Hills police officers.”

Of course we would be remiss or (worse) hypocritical if we did not recognize that these pages too, within the Barrington Hills Observer, have added to the “noise.”  If only by necessity, we have editorialized and perhaps sometimes heightened the public debate on controversial local political topics and public figures.

We spend too much money on trustee campaigns; we stuff mailboxes with too many mailers; there are too many political coffees (and too few social ones); and too many articles about all of them.  And, while we could never be critical of public participation in government, the reality is that our Village Board meetings are too well attended because they are filled with so much drama.  We’ve become a rival to reality television, including the expletives.

Now back to the question.  What have we lost?  The answer is that we have lost peace and a commitment to the public and private service of our neighbors.  We have taken the noise to a level that cannot be sustained and it is time to back down.  If not, what’s next?  More signs.  More lawsuits.  More lawyers and lawyer fees.  More mailers.  And, regrettably and not coincidentally, more “for sale” signs.  We have written before on the need to restore peace to Barrington Hills, (Read “Why Barrington Hills must change”). It is equally or more true today.

On April 7th, next Tuesday, we will have an opportunity as a Village to restore peace to Barrington Hills at the ballot box and, one can only hope, to usher in a new era of public and private service of our neighbors.  Our roads and budgets and zoning laws need repair.  For those jobs we need trustees who will be devoted to public service and unity.   We need residents who possess the skills needed to fix our broken roads, budgets and zoning laws, not noisemakers.

The Observer will publish its endorsements on Monday.  Suffice it to say we will not be endorsing the candidates whose names have been synonymous with the noise that now covers the Village like a blanket.

It is time to reflect and to reduce the “signs” of trouble in our Village.

–     The Observer

 

Read Full Post »

every_vote_countsEveryone knows this time of year in early spring the weather can be dramatically different from one day to the next.  One day you can have your window open to let in fresh air and another we’re covering budding plants to protect them from frost, so consider voting early this year when the weather’s favorable.

Early voting is still an option for Barrington Hills voters through this Saturday, April 7th.  We’d like to remind readers that two years ago, about ten votes made the difference between candidates winning or losing a seat on our Village Board, so every vote counts.

Polling locations closest to Barrington Hills are listed below.  Click on the county you live in for more information including hours and other locations to vote:

  • Cook – Barrington Hills Village Hall, 112 Algonquin Rd
  • Kane – Dundee Township, 611 E. Main St., Suite 200, East Dundee
  • Lake – Lake Barrington Village Hall, 23860 N. Barrington Rd
  • McHenry – Algonquin Township, 3702 Northwest Hwy., Crystal Lake

We believe this election is critical for the future of our Village, so if you cannot vote early, please vote on Election Day, April 7th.

Read Full Post »

A month after rejecting a proposal to outsource the village’s police dispatch operations, village trustees reversed course Monday and narrowly approved the same measure.

The decision means that the village will join QuadCom, a Carpentersville-based 911 center that dispatches for nine other nearby communities, including South Barrington and East Dundee.

Read more here.

Editor’s note:  As a result of unnecessary delays in this decision, due primarily to questionable stalling by Trustee Harrington and SOS candidates Patty Meroni and Karen Selman, taxpayers are now on the hook for an additional $67,000 for the 911 consolidation with QuadCom.

Read Full Post »

SOS 2Reports of a popular Barrington Hills polo tournament’s demise turned out to be exaggerated, after the village board voted Monday to extend The Kalaway Cup Polo Event’s special use permit for the next 20 years.

Earlier this month, a proposal to extend the permit failed to receive the votes it needed from the village’s zoning board, prompting concerns that the annual competition would end after this year. Barrington Hills Polo Club President [and SOS Party campaign committeeman] John Rosene sent out a news release calling the vote “a tragedy,” and saying the event had been killed.

Read more from the Daily Herald here.

Also see “Polo politicking – SOS Party style”

Read Full Post »

We had originally planned to publish only four articles in our “Don’t be deceived” series.  However, the SOS campaign has seen to it that we will have to extend it as long as they continue to mislead voters with misrepresentations of the facts, or only telling part of the story, as witnessed in their most recent mailer to residents.

Haggers Bend TreesSOS Spin: SOS’s latest scam mailing comes in the form of a letter purportedly written by one of their supporters.  Included in the letter is a photo (inset left) of oak trees with thin yellow ribbons with the caption, “Heritage Oak Trees slated for destruction to put bike lanes on Haegers Bend Road.”

Reality: The ribbons were tied on the trees for dramatic effect, but not by municipal workers.  And, we’re not sure where these trees are located, but Gewalt Hamilton’s engineering plans only proposed bike lanes on part of Haegers Bend north of Spring Creek Road.

Had SOS candidate Meroni’s proposal to add bike lanes in return for outside funding for Haegers Bend Road reconstruction succeeded, other trees might have been at risk, but as we all know, Meroni cowered once she was found out and she quickly passed blame elsewhere, neglecting to recall that an audit trail of meetings and memos demonstrate the bike lanes were her proposed plan all along.

SOS Spin:  “(President McLaughlin is) actively working with CMAP to develop a bike route through Barrington Hills.”

Reality:  This is patently false.  The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is in the process of planning a bike route somewhere to connect Crabtree Nature Center to trails along the Fox River.  CMAP is acting completely independently of Barrington Hills, and the roads being considered are for bike traffic are either county or state roads, over which the Village has no jurisdiction.  Anyone from any community can, and has, provided input as to where the bike route may end up.  McLaughlin has never advocated for any bike route, and he has no control over the outcome of the CMAP initiative.

SOS Spin:  (One Barrington Hills candidates) Mr. Croll, Mr. Cecola and Ms. Maison have never volunteered with any civic organization in Barrington Hills.”

Reality: Another deliberate lie.  Between them, these three candidates have volunteered dozens of years of their time to various organizations that benefit not only residents of Barrington Hills, but the greater Barrington area as well, including, among others, the Barrington Area Conservation Trust and Barrington Children’s Charities. 

We advise readers to look at their long list of civic credentials via the One Barrington Hills campaign website by clicking here, or visit their Facebook page here.  

SOS Spin:  “(One Barrington Hills candidate) Mr. Cecola evades the fact he’s only lived in Barrington Hills for 3 years with a claim he’s been a lifelong resident of 60010.”

Reality:  Cecola evaded nothing.  He and his wife, Stephanie, moved to Barrington Hills in 2011, having been Riding Club of Barrington Hills members for more than a decade before, during which time they boarded their horses here in the Village.  Now they keep their horses on their own property.  Sadly, this old “nag’s tale” keeps coming up at election time, maliciously questioning the length of one’s residency, when the only thing that really matters is that someone is willing to volunteer to serve their fellow residents.

If they consider this “evasion,” then perhaps the SOS Party should explain why they don’t point out Karen Selman lives on less than 2 acres instead of 5.  That would be silly, but it’s just petty politics being played here by SOS.

SOS Spin:  “(One Barrington Hills candidate) Mr. Croll has virtually no professional employment history”

Reality:  After receiving his MBA from Georgetown University, Croll began his career in finance with Sony.  His career path changed (as did his brother’s) when their father, who owned a group of private companies, suddenly passed away, and Brian’s business expertise was needed to run the family’s businesses.

For 16 years now, Croll has served as president of this group of companies.  For SOS to begin to characterize his employment history the way they have is inexplicable, since anyone remotely familiar with the business world knows private companies are extremely hands-on as opposed to public sector jobs.

SOS Spin: “(One Barrington Hills candidate) Michelle Maison misled the Daily Herald about her professional credentials.  She implied that she was a practicing attorney and a professional mediator. ”

Reality:  Considering the signatory author of this SOS support letter was not present at the candidate’s interview with the Daily Herald, the use of the word “misled” is extremely desperate.

Maison practiced law from 1991-2002, and is now applying her experience as a trained, professional mediator.  The SOS allegations that she is “forbidden” from serving as a “court-appointed mediator in Cook, Lake, Dupage [sic], Kane or McHenry counties” is absurd, and is just more shrouded misinformation in the hope voters will not question SOS’s backgrounds or ethics.

For an accurate summary of Maison’s background and what a professional mediator can perform in the courts in the four counties that make up Barrington Hills, click here.

We find it laughable that the SOS candidates can even attempt to impugn the qualifications and experience of the One Barrington Hills candidates since they clearly have serious deficits of their own when it comes to simple matters.

Once again, they spelled SOS candidate Naumann’s name incorrectly on stickers attached to last week’s Barrington Courier newspapers and display ads that have run for days now in the web-based version of the paper as seen below:Naumann Misspelled AGAIN

Perhaps they should consider getting their own campaign in order first before casting aspersions on others.  To be fair, though, correct spelling may not be their greatest asset, but at least they’ve “proven” they can tie a yellow ribbon around trees, and isn’t that a quality we desperately need on our Village Board?

–     The Observer

Read Full Post »

lies4Most residents who have paid even a little attention to our Village government over the last few years recognize we have some ethical issues with certain members of our Village Board.  Two of those current members, and a newcomer, are running as the SOS Party, and so far, their campaign has focused mainly on distorting facts in various media, yet they advise residents to not be deceived.

Part three of our series, “Don’t be deceived,” continues with more distortions spread by the SOS party as follows:

SOS Spin:  “Kalaway Cup Polo Event Killed in Barrington Hills.”

Reality:  This is likely the most cockamamie campaign stunt ever pulled in the history of Barrington Hills politics, and why has SOS consistently called this event by its incorrect name?  It’s been the ”LeCompte Kalaway Cup” for some time now, so why is SOS omitting the name of the host of the event?

SOS political campaign committeeman and Polo Club President John Rosene’s application for a renewed special use permit for the event is on the Village Board’s agenda for a vote at Monday night’s meeting.  Assuming at least four of the five “Save 5 Acres” Trustees use their block voting power, the permit will be granted two weeks after it was declared “dead” by the SOS spin masters, and we can expect another mass campaign announcement the following day.

SOS Spin:  “According to the 2014 Village Survey, 64.1 percent of residents responding believe that ‘Equestrian Boarding’ in Barrington Hills helps to ‘protect open space and maintain large land parcels.’”

“’I think it’s important for all residents to read this survey report,’ states Mary Naumann.”

Reality:  Clearly SOS candidate Mary Naumann didn’t read the complete survey.  If she had, she’d recognize the fact that the numbers were stacked by people taking the survey multiple times, and many non-residents from anywhere in the world could have taken it.

What SOS candidates fail to mention is, according to the survey, 57.8 percent of respondents stated they own horses.  Since this percentage is highly inflated (by a factor of roughly 3 times), unfortunately all the data in the report is suspect, despite Village Hall staff’s best efforts to accurately gather data from residents.  A copy of the 2014 survey report, which the SOS Party neglected to provide to residents, can be viewed here.

SOS Spin:  (One Barrington Hills candidates will) “Use eminent domain to widen roads, install bike lanes and make our village more developer-friendly”

Reality:  SOS candidate Patty Meroni is already using eminent domain for the Cuba Road Bridge project robbing adjacent landowners of property in exchange for funding.  Had her proposal to the McHenry County Council of Governments for funding Haegers Bend roadwork succeeded in 2012, eminent domain would have taken acres of property from homeowners.

One Barrington Hills candidates Bryan Croll, Michelle Nagy Maison and Brian Cecola, have made it abundantly clear they are against bike lanes, and in favor of Heritage Corridors to protect against road widening for any purpose.  In fact, Brian Croll is seated on the Board of Directors of the Barrington Area Conservation Trust, which has made establishment of Heritage Corridors within the Village a top priority, so the SOS allegations are false.

SOS Spin:  “Our opponents have not stated their position on feathering and have received campaign donations from pro-development contributors.”

Reality:  One Barrington Hills candidates solidly support land conservation and will protect five-acre zoning. Period.  Sadly over the last few election cycles, SOS (and Save 5 Acres before them) has made a habit of unfounded fear-mongering and false accusations about any opponent being less committed than they are to preserving the minimum lot sizes that everyone supports.

As for the ridiculous allegation that “pro-development” contributors are funding the One Barrington Hills campaign, a simple study of State Board of Elections filings proves this to be another falsehood. 

Frankly, we don’t understand why they would even raise this as an “issue”, since the largest single contributor to the SOS campaign ($10,800) and members of his family sit on the board of the organization that purchased the “Duda Property” in 2014 (most of which is adjacent to Barrington Hills in unincorporated McHenry County).

SOS Spin:  (SOS candidate Meroni) Longmeadow Parkway Project: Informed residents; coordinated communication between residents and Kane County engineers; held meetings to work for resolution on critical issues impacting residents.

Reality:  SOS candidate Patty Meroni only spoke of the Longmeadow Parkway project once progress was announced in the press, (and on this website), when she had no alternative. 

The Observer has provided press updates on the project dating back to January of 2013.  Yet Meroni fails to mention that, until December 2013, she expressed no knowledge of the timeline or progression of Longmeadow, despite the fact that former President Abboud had signed a resolution of support for the project back in 2006.  If Barrington Hills had taken an active role in the ongoing planning for Longmeadow Bridge, perhaps we could have eliminated any routing through the village completely.

The initial meetings with residents she references were by invitation only, and not posted to the Village Calendar.  It was only after she was pressured did she announce Longmeadow meetings for all interested residents to attend.  This is hardly being proactive, and once again, residents will lose parts or all of their properties as a result of her tenure as Roads & Bridges chairperson.

Part four of this series continues soon in the Barrington Hills Observer.     

    

Read Full Post »

2015 ElectionsRules governing the commercial boarding of horses in recent years have divided Barrington Hills and helped fuel the six-way race for Village Board.

The controversy has pitted neighbor against neighbor and prompted an ongoing private lawsuit. An attempt by the Village Board to change zoning rules to resolve the issue was not only vetoed by Village President Martin McLaughlin, but also prompted him to hire special legal counsel to investigate the five trustees who voted to change the boarding regulations.

Bringing an end to a worsening relationship between village leaders and residents weighs greatly on the candidates. Incumbents Karen Selman and Patty Meroni, and newcomers Mary Naumann, Bryan Croll, Michelle Nagy Maison and Brian Cecola, are running for three open seats.

Read more from the Northwest Herald here, and be sure to click on the candidates highlighted names above and in the article to read their profiles.

Read Full Post »

The Village has posted the agenda for Monday evening’s Village Board meeting beginning at 6:30 PM at Village Hall.  The meeting is scheduled to begin with a public hearing regarding the proposed 2015 Appropriations Ordinance.  A copy of the Ordinance can be downloaded here.

Topics for discussion during the public meeting include:

  • Multi Year Road Program
  • [Vote] Dispatch Outsource Res. 15-
  • [Vote] Amendment Special Use, Polo Club Res. 15-
  • BACOG Lease Extension

A copy of the agenda can be downloaded here or viewed via the Village Google calendar here.

Read Full Post »

Beware-of-the-half-truthYesterday, we published part one of our series, “Don’t be deceived.”  In that article, we began to chronicle the many campaign distortions the SOS Party has used in an effort to sway votes their way from less informed voters in Barrington Hills.  Hidden agendas, overstated responsibilities and activities while in office, and misrepresentations of the facts in the 2015 SOS campaign were uncovered.

Today’s edition continues with more of the deceits candidates Meroni, Selman, Naumann and their campaign team have spun as follows:

SOS Spin: The Barrington Hills roads under the supervision of Patty Meroni are well maintained and are at or under budget since she was elected 4 years ago.

Reality:  Under SOS candidate Patty Meroni’s “supervision” the condition of Village roads have never been worse.  Under her watch of four years, the backlog of road resurfacing planned projects has increased to nearly five miles of roadways.  Read “So why do our roads ‘suck’?” for expanded information on the state of our roads.

SOS Spin: “…60% of the 102.5 miles of roads in Barrington Hills are controlled and maintained by Cook County or the state or are private roads.”

Reality: As Trustee assigned to Village roads and bridges maintenance, SOS candidate Patty Meroni has made it clear that she is only responsible for Village roads and no others.  We believe a responsive Roads and Bridges chair should, and will, concern themselves with the conditions of all roadways except private roads within the borders of Barrington Hills.

Regardless of where they live, residents of Barrington Hills pay taxes to the state, respective counties and to the Village, and every resident uses roads that are maintained by all of these government bodies.  If Meroni had adopted a resident-centric, responsible approach to addressing concerns regarding road conditions throughout the Village early on, residents would not be told they need to call a government bureaucracy when they’ve damaged their car due to a pothole on “Brinker, Bateman, Otis and Lake-Cook” roads.  Instead, they should be able to call Village Hall staff, and they should take it from there.

SOS Spin: (Karen Selman) “(is) Responsible for performance assessments and improved functioning of village staff and operations.

Reality:  Prior to President McLaughlin taking office two years ago, there were no written performance assessments or evaluations of Village staff.  None.  Clearly since McLaughlin added this to Selman’s plate as it relates to the Village Treasurer, she obviously seeks credit for this.  Additionally, we’ve witnessed no significant reports from Selman during Village Board meetings on her “responsibilities” in this area.

SOS Spin: (Mary Naumann and supporters) “…created a website” for their mission to keep bicycle lanes off Haegers Bend and possibly other roads.

Reality:  SOS candidate Mary Naumann had some very experienced help in creating a politically spun website (see “Of Bikes and Blame – Part One: The Phantom Menace”) that is littered with deceit.  What her website fails to disclose is the off-campus goings on where her running mate, Patty Meroni, met with various agencies related to road reclassifications and offers related to Village roadways as can be viewed here.

SOS Spin:  “As ruled by the Illinois State Board of Elections, Meroni and Selman committed a minor paperwork error that was deemed “inadvertent and unintentional.”

Reality:   SOS candidates Patty Meroni and Karen Selman (and their running mate at the time, Joe Messer), blamed someone in an administrative capacity for their committee’s misrepresentation of the true source of their reported individual $5,000 financial contributions to their 2011 campaign which actually came from the owner of a large horse boarding operation  (see “Errors were made; others were blamed…”).

State Board of Elections hearing officer, Andy Nauman, who wrote the final SBOE report apparently sympathized with their ignorance of campaign finance disclosure, but nonetheless, recommended a fine and suspension of their committee for a period of two years.

Part three in our “Don’t be deceived” series will appear in this weekend’s Barrington Hills Observer.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »