Less than a week remains until the election, and predictably, a flurry of 11th hour campaign mailings are landing in mailboxes, proclaiming breaking news and urgent bulletins, all carefully timed to prevent rebuttal by their targets, Martin McLaughlin and Colleen Konicek Hannigan.
This time, the mailings, which are highly critical of Marty and Colleen, are coming from a private citizen, rather than a candidate’s campaign committee, so we will not name the person in question. But the individual is well known as a key member of the polo club, as one of the most extreme equestrians in the village and as a bosom buddy of the former village president. Readers should be familiar with his notorious 2005 White Paper.
In his first mailing, he basically repeated many of the fabricated claims that have been raised by the Your Barrington Hills candidates Iacovelli, Jacobsen and Zubak, whom he supports, along with Equestrienne Ramesh. Our feature Meet the Candidates Part Two: YBH — the Trojan Horsemen, published yesterday, set the record straight on many of those issues.
The second letter received today alleges a lawsuit recently filed against the village concerning commercial horse boarding is being hidden from residents. The writer attempts rile up the electorate with false outrage and cries of lack of transparency. Funny thing is, he fails to mention that one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit is the very same owner/operator of the commercial boarding operation on Bateman Road that has already cost our village taxpayers hundreds of thousands in legal fees in numerous lawsuits over the last decade. Oh, and the letter writer’s polo club has an arrangement with that plaintiff to use the polo field at that very boarding facility.
So what about the assertion that the trustees and the public have not been made aware of the lawsuit? Untrue. We direct you to the recently released recording of the Village Board meeting held on March 21st, 2017 when the lawsuit was IN FACT discussed in open session in the first board meeting held after the case was filed. Click here to hear Village Attorney Patrick Bond’s statement that the Board was emailed a litigation update regarding the amended complaint in connection with that case. It is apparent that both the Board and the public have been made aware of the filings.
[We wonder where the letter writer’s outrage was when the Sears litigation went on for 13 YEARS without mention to the public until President McLaughlin took it upon himself to work with South Barrington to settle that suit, which could have meant a $20 million dollar judgment against the two villages if Sears had prevailed.]
The March 21st recordings also include the Chief of Police Rich Semelsberger describing the village’s continuing use of the CTY Community Alert System. His discussion not only makes it clear that the alert system has not been abandoned, but actually has been used, in his words, ” very liberally” for announcements of road closures, chemical spills, missing persons, etc. He further clarified that the Police Department makes the decision to issue an alert, not the president or the board, and that the Department balances the public’s need to know with the timeliness of the message. Semelsberger’s comments about the CTY alerts, including a mention of a FOIA request having been filed and fulfilled on the topic, can be heard here.
The Chief also responded to a Board question about police staffing here, and explained that in the 28 years that he has been with the department, there have always been a minimum of two officers on patrol at any given time. Currently there are two officers out on extended injury, and as a result, other personnel have been reassigned to ensure adequate coverage. Additionally, there are two new officers scheduled to begin training at the Illinois State Police Academy on April 9th, as a result of a screening process that began last year.
So, the claims about the “hidden lawsuit” are false. Claims about the abandonment of the CTY Alert System are false. Claims about insufficient police staffing are false. Claims about FOIA expenses are false. Claims about rebranding are false. Claims about 911 dispatch outsourcing are false. And on, and on, and on.
Four days remain until the election, and we see the same pitiful pattern of deception that we’ve seen in previous campaigns. Outrageous claims are made, lawsuits and FOIA requests filed, and last minute grenades are launched — all by the same bad actors. It’s the same small vocal group, inextricably tied to the former president, that spews misinformation and attempts to bully and intimidate the regular folks in the village. In 2013, voters said “Enough!” In 2015, they shouted “ENOUGH!” In 2017, let’s get the big hook out and finally drag those bad actors off of the village stage once and for all.
We encourage our readers to stay informed and to share our posts with their friends and neighbors as this critical campaign draws to a conclusion on Tuesday.
[NOTE: The Observer itself is mentioned in both of the aforementioned mailings, and we have to say that free advertising is always appreciated, although not needed, as our readership is booming.]
A 16-year resident of 
Both major regional newspapers recently released the responses to their Candidate Questionnaires.
Voters seeking to cast their ballots early for the April 4th Village Board Election can do so starting today in all four counties. Seats on school boards, park district boards, library boards, township offices and other county/regional offices are also up for grabs.
Press Release: Unite Barrington Hills candidates, Martin McLaughlin and Colleen Konicek Hannigan, oppose the burdening of Barrington Hills’ taxpayers with the proposed Hoffman Estates development at Routes 59 and 72 (now outside the Barrington Hills’ border due to 2010 deannexation) which will place more students into CUSD 220 and 300.
More trustee candidates in the upcoming April 4th election (running independently from the Unite Barrington Hills 
