Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘LeCompte/Anderson Commercial Horse boarding amendment’ Category

Oakwood Farm Operation

Barrington Hills is being sued by a group of residents who want the village to tear up the new horse boarding rules just weeks after they were finally approved.

The suit’s plaintiffs, Barrington Hills residents James Drury, Jack Reich and James O’Donnell have long been engaged in a legal dispute with their neighbor Benjamin LeCompte, who operates Oakwood Farms, a horse boarding operation.

The new lawsuit claims that the horse boarding rules should be thrown out because three trustees — Messer, Karen Selman and Patty Meroni — accepted $15,000 in campaign donations from LeCompte in 2011. The candidates returned the donations but received a warning from the State Board of Elections after it was discovered that LeCompte had not been properly identified as the original source of the funds. LeCompte later made the $15,000 donation to the candidates’ Save 5 Acres slate, not to the individual candidates.

Read the full Daily Herald article here.

Read Full Post »

 

Oakwood Farm Operation

We’ve received a copy of the recently filed lawsuit against the Village in the Circuit Court of Cook County by four resident plaintiffs on February 27th.

Trustees Patty Meroni and Karen Selman, both running for reelection under the SOS Party, as well as Trustee Joseph Messer, are among the Village officials mentioned often in the “Verified Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Injunction, and Other Relief.”

A copy of the three-count lawsuit, including background narrative residents should read, can be downloaded here.

The Village Board is convening a special meeting tomorrow, March 9, beginning at 6:30 PM at Village Hall to discuss the selection of Special Counsel to represent the Village in the matter.  A copy of their agenda can be viewed here.

Read Full Post »

Audio recordings from last month’s regular Village Board meeting are available for review.  Since the meeting lasted about four and a half hours, we’ll do our best to summarize the highlights and lowlights from the meeting.

Ten people spoke during public comment, although for some reason the recording from the eighth speaker is not available.

The first speaker informed attendees of the upcoming roadside trash pickup in April and then went on to plead that some Board members put politics aside and pay Patrick Bond, temporary Village Counsel for the services he’s been providing to the Board.  We agree, and his comments can be heard here.

The fifth speaker brought up her observation that there is a “substantial similarity” between the SOS Party’s campaign logo to that of the Village of Barrington Hills copyrighted logo used in Village communications, and she questioned if this was legal under copyright law.

She also expressed concern that the use of the SOS Party logo in campaign media might confuse residents and possibly could infer some form of endorsement by the Village in the SOS Party campaign.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two logos she referred to:

Save Open Space Logo

Save Open Space Logo

Barrington Hills Logo

Barrington Hills Logo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Her comments can be heard here, and again, we recommend readers listen to all who commented.

During the Finance discussion of the monthly bills for payment, payment to Patrick Bond was again denied via a motion by Trustee Harrington.  Trustees Gohl, Messer, Meroni and Selman then approved his motion in the political lockstep we’ve come to expect from most on this Village Board.   In a prior vote, Trustee Gohl had voted in favor of Bond’s payment.

The Roads & Bridges discussion followed with some disheartening news about the backlog of road resurfacing in Barrington Hills.  It was questioned if the goal of repaving 3.2 miles per year was even attainable.

History disproves this since in 2013 3.15 miles of roads were resurfaced once legal expenses were dramatically curtailed. Nonetheless, that is likely too little too late, and though discussions will continue at this month’s Board meeting, it’s likely some amount of tax increase will have to be passed on to residents.

During the Public Safety portion of the meeting, as previously reported, Trustees voted not to consolidate 911 Dispatch with QuadCom by a vote of 4-2, with President McLaughlin abstaining.  Trustee Harrington stated his priorities were safety first and financials of the consolidation second.  Later, when explaining his vote against consolidation, he stated he’d like to see more numbers before deciding.  That’s a bit contradictory.

Next came the Building and Zoning discussion and action beginning with a motion to override the veto of the LeCompte/Anderson Horse Boarding Ordinance.  Prior to the vote, President McLaughlin weighed in on his concern over passing the Ordinance based on the legal exposure it would likely create for the Village.

As we’ve recently learned, his concerns were warranted.  According to the Cook County Circuit Court website (click here to view the record), a complaint was filed against the Village just four days after Trustees Gohl, Harrington, Messer, Meroni and Selman voted to override the veto, and now a special Village Board meeting is scheduled for Monday to discuss a defense against the complaint.

During this same session, Trustee Messer motioned to set compensation for the Special Counsel named by President McLaughlin to review the proceedings that led to the LeCompte/Anderson Horse Boarding Ordinance at $0.  Trustee Meroni seconded, and the motion passed 5-2 in what, unfortunately, has become an all too familiar partisan vote.

The Administration portion of the meeting actually began at the start of the meeting since President McLaughlin moved it forward.  Richard Semelsberger, a 26-year veteran of the Barrington Police Department, was promoted from acting Police Chief to a permanent appointment with a unanimous vote.   Officer Joseph Colditz was then promoted to the post of Deputy Chief, and we congratulate both gentlemen on their well-deserved promotions.

The status of an Ordinance passed in January which changed the authority to appoint special counsel, from being solely at the discretion of the Village President to the Village Board in its entirety, was then discussed.  Trustee Messer sponsored the measure, and it passed by a partisan 5-2 vote.

President McLaughlin vetoed the Ordinance, and went on to cite Illinois Statutes that prohibit such a change without prior passage of a referendum by residents of the Village.  As it turns out, what Trustees Gohl, Harrington, Messer, Meroni and Selman approved in their proposed Ordinance at the January Village Board meeting is unconstitutional under State Law since it would essentially change our form of government.

Politically charged banter was peppered throughout the meeting.  Most of it emanated from four Trustees clearly supporting the SOS Party, but honestly, is a public meeting of our elected officials really the forum for this?

We don’t think so and many agree.  We understand even some SOS supporters in the room that night were taken aback by what they witnessed.

The link to the menu of edited recording segments from the meeting can be found here.

Read Full Post »

A Special Village Board meeting has been called by Trustees Harrington and Messer for Monday evening, March 9, at 6:30 PM.  According to their agenda, topics to be discussed and voted on are:

  • [Vote] PSAP Consulting Solutions Proposal (911 Consolidation)
  • [Vote] Select Special Counsel to represent B.H in Drury v. B.H. lawsuit
  • [Vote] Select Special Counsel to represent B.H. regarding Insurance Coverage for Drury v. B.H. Lawsuit

It should be noted that public comment will be allowed after the business before the Board is concluded according to Harrington and Messer’s agenda, which can be viewed here.

Read Full Post »

SOS 2Since we last reported on the campaign donations garnered by the SOS Party, three more donations in excess of $1,000 have been filed with the IL State Board of Elections for the period from February 1st to March 2nd.  Those donations came from:

  • Elaine Ramesh – $1,000 on February 20th
  • Bruce Pfaff – $1,000 on February 21st
  • Bryan Cressey – $10,800 on March 2nd

This brings their total reported donations of $1,000 or more to a total of $54,100 campaign-to-date.  To put things in perspective, two years ago at this time, six candidates running under the banners Save 5 Acres, Unite Barrington Hills and Citizens for Stieper had raised a total of $11,000 in reported donations combined.

Also since our last report, the SOS Party has named four content contributors to their website, and presumably to their Facebook page.  The four named are Steve Knoop, Leslie Coolidge, John Rosene and Dan Lundmark, and the website states that Meroni, Selman and Naumann, the three SOS candidates, edit and approve of all social media, website and hard copy content for the SOS campaign.

Much of volumes we’ve read so far in various media SOS has published include sheer fiction, and we plan to address these very soon in an upcoming editorial.

Perhaps it’s time for the seven involved in writing and editing to take pause and address something more fundamental, such as the correct spelling of one of the candidate’s names on the website homepage and other places on their SOS website:

March 4 Naumann Screencap Corrected Name

There are three “N’s” in Naumann.

Take your time, though.  Don’t sweat minor details.  Chances are there’s more of your fabricated political spin to get out there first that is more important.

Read Full Post »

The Village has posted a copy of the agenda for this evening’s Equestrian Commission meeting which begins at 7:00 PM at Village Hall.  Topics to be discussed include:

  • [Discussion] Septic Flow Rates – Barns & Stables
  • Horse Density /Livestock Information

It’s unfortunate that an ePacket agenda for the meeting is not available for review.  We would have appreciated a glance, particularly the draft minutes from their special meeting on August 1st when the Commissioners voted unanimously to recommend the retroactivity clause be removed from the LeCompte Commercial Horse Boarding Amendment.

One Commissioner can be heard in the recordings from that meeting stating that keeping the clause would be like “trying to rewrite history.”  Another Commissioner concurred stating “I think it’s totally inappropriate.”  The recording of their respective comments can be heard here.

Their vote to remove that clause was never discussed in subsequent Zoning Board meetings despite the fact that members of the Equestrian Commission were in attendance and chose not to speak.  Nor did Trustee Karen Selman, liaison to the Equestrian Commission, ever bring their recommendation up in any Village Board meeting prior to approval of the LeCompte/Anderson Amendment.

A copy of this evening’s full Equestrian Commission agenda can be viewed here.

Read Full Post »

Oakwood Farm Operation

After years of debate, Barrington Hills residents finally have rules regarding the number of horses they can board on their property.

Village trustees on Monday voted to overturn Village President Marty McLaughlin’s veto of boarding regulations first approved by the board in December.

The new rules allow one boarded horse per acre on properties 10 acres or smaller. For properties larger than 10 acres, two boarded horses per acre would be allowed.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

The ePacket agenda containing links to some documents to be discussed during this evening’s Village Board meeting has been posted.  To access the link, click here.

Read Full Post »

The Village has posted the agenda for Monday evening’s Village Board meeting.  Topics for discussion include:

  • Multi Year Road Program
  • Dispatch Consolidation Resolution
  • Veto Override Horse Boarding Amendment
  • President’s Veto Report, Ord. 15-01 Special Counsel

A copy of the agenda can be downloaded here or viewed via the Village Google calendar here.

Read Full Post »

Barrington Hills officials have spent years trying to come up with a solution to the commercial horse-boarding controversy sparked by a neighbor dispute and an ongoing lawsuit pitting residents against one another.

The village board recently passed a zoning text amendment aimed at resolving the controversy, but the measure was vetoed by Village President Martin McLaughlin, in what’s believed to be the first veto in village history.

The six candidates for three village trustee seats in the April 7 election recently debated the proposed solution, and McLaughlin’s veto, during an endorsement conference with the Daily Herald.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »