Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Save 5 Acres’ Category

Oakwood Farm Operation

Barrington Hills is being sued by a group of residents who want the village to tear up the new horse boarding rules just weeks after they were finally approved.

The suit’s plaintiffs, Barrington Hills residents James Drury, Jack Reich and James O’Donnell have long been engaged in a legal dispute with their neighbor Benjamin LeCompte, who operates Oakwood Farms, a horse boarding operation.

The new lawsuit claims that the horse boarding rules should be thrown out because three trustees — Messer, Karen Selman and Patty Meroni — accepted $15,000 in campaign donations from LeCompte in 2011. The candidates returned the donations but received a warning from the State Board of Elections after it was discovered that LeCompte had not been properly identified as the original source of the funds. LeCompte later made the $15,000 donation to the candidates’ Save 5 Acres slate, not to the individual candidates.

Read the full Daily Herald article here.

Read Full Post »

 

Oakwood Farm Operation

We’ve received a copy of the recently filed lawsuit against the Village in the Circuit Court of Cook County by four resident plaintiffs on February 27th.

Trustees Patty Meroni and Karen Selman, both running for reelection under the SOS Party, as well as Trustee Joseph Messer, are among the Village officials mentioned often in the “Verified Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Injunction, and Other Relief.”

A copy of the three-count lawsuit, including background narrative residents should read, can be downloaded here.

The Village Board is convening a special meeting tomorrow, March 9, beginning at 6:30 PM at Village Hall to discuss the selection of Special Counsel to represent the Village in the matter.  A copy of their agenda can be viewed here.

Read Full Post »

Audio recordings from last month’s regular Village Board meeting are available for review.  Since the meeting lasted about four and a half hours, we’ll do our best to summarize the highlights and lowlights from the meeting.

Ten people spoke during public comment, although for some reason the recording from the eighth speaker is not available.

The first speaker informed attendees of the upcoming roadside trash pickup in April and then went on to plead that some Board members put politics aside and pay Patrick Bond, temporary Village Counsel for the services he’s been providing to the Board.  We agree, and his comments can be heard here.

The fifth speaker brought up her observation that there is a “substantial similarity” between the SOS Party’s campaign logo to that of the Village of Barrington Hills copyrighted logo used in Village communications, and she questioned if this was legal under copyright law.

She also expressed concern that the use of the SOS Party logo in campaign media might confuse residents and possibly could infer some form of endorsement by the Village in the SOS Party campaign.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two logos she referred to:

Save Open Space Logo

Save Open Space Logo

Barrington Hills Logo

Barrington Hills Logo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Her comments can be heard here, and again, we recommend readers listen to all who commented.

During the Finance discussion of the monthly bills for payment, payment to Patrick Bond was again denied via a motion by Trustee Harrington.  Trustees Gohl, Messer, Meroni and Selman then approved his motion in the political lockstep we’ve come to expect from most on this Village Board.   In a prior vote, Trustee Gohl had voted in favor of Bond’s payment.

The Roads & Bridges discussion followed with some disheartening news about the backlog of road resurfacing in Barrington Hills.  It was questioned if the goal of repaving 3.2 miles per year was even attainable.

History disproves this since in 2013 3.15 miles of roads were resurfaced once legal expenses were dramatically curtailed. Nonetheless, that is likely too little too late, and though discussions will continue at this month’s Board meeting, it’s likely some amount of tax increase will have to be passed on to residents.

During the Public Safety portion of the meeting, as previously reported, Trustees voted not to consolidate 911 Dispatch with QuadCom by a vote of 4-2, with President McLaughlin abstaining.  Trustee Harrington stated his priorities were safety first and financials of the consolidation second.  Later, when explaining his vote against consolidation, he stated he’d like to see more numbers before deciding.  That’s a bit contradictory.

Next came the Building and Zoning discussion and action beginning with a motion to override the veto of the LeCompte/Anderson Horse Boarding Ordinance.  Prior to the vote, President McLaughlin weighed in on his concern over passing the Ordinance based on the legal exposure it would likely create for the Village.

As we’ve recently learned, his concerns were warranted.  According to the Cook County Circuit Court website (click here to view the record), a complaint was filed against the Village just four days after Trustees Gohl, Harrington, Messer, Meroni and Selman voted to override the veto, and now a special Village Board meeting is scheduled for Monday to discuss a defense against the complaint.

During this same session, Trustee Messer motioned to set compensation for the Special Counsel named by President McLaughlin to review the proceedings that led to the LeCompte/Anderson Horse Boarding Ordinance at $0.  Trustee Meroni seconded, and the motion passed 5-2 in what, unfortunately, has become an all too familiar partisan vote.

The Administration portion of the meeting actually began at the start of the meeting since President McLaughlin moved it forward.  Richard Semelsberger, a 26-year veteran of the Barrington Police Department, was promoted from acting Police Chief to a permanent appointment with a unanimous vote.   Officer Joseph Colditz was then promoted to the post of Deputy Chief, and we congratulate both gentlemen on their well-deserved promotions.

The status of an Ordinance passed in January which changed the authority to appoint special counsel, from being solely at the discretion of the Village President to the Village Board in its entirety, was then discussed.  Trustee Messer sponsored the measure, and it passed by a partisan 5-2 vote.

President McLaughlin vetoed the Ordinance, and went on to cite Illinois Statutes that prohibit such a change without prior passage of a referendum by residents of the Village.  As it turns out, what Trustees Gohl, Harrington, Messer, Meroni and Selman approved in their proposed Ordinance at the January Village Board meeting is unconstitutional under State Law since it would essentially change our form of government.

Politically charged banter was peppered throughout the meeting.  Most of it emanated from four Trustees clearly supporting the SOS Party, but honestly, is a public meeting of our elected officials really the forum for this?

We don’t think so and many agree.  We understand even some SOS supporters in the room that night were taken aback by what they witnessed.

The link to the menu of edited recording segments from the meeting can be found here.

Read Full Post »

SOS 2Since we last reported on the campaign donations garnered by the SOS Party, three more donations in excess of $1,000 have been filed with the IL State Board of Elections for the period from February 1st to March 2nd.  Those donations came from:

  • Elaine Ramesh – $1,000 on February 20th
  • Bruce Pfaff – $1,000 on February 21st
  • Bryan Cressey – $10,800 on March 2nd

This brings their total reported donations of $1,000 or more to a total of $54,100 campaign-to-date.  To put things in perspective, two years ago at this time, six candidates running under the banners Save 5 Acres, Unite Barrington Hills and Citizens for Stieper had raised a total of $11,000 in reported donations combined.

Also since our last report, the SOS Party has named four content contributors to their website, and presumably to their Facebook page.  The four named are Steve Knoop, Leslie Coolidge, John Rosene and Dan Lundmark, and the website states that Meroni, Selman and Naumann, the three SOS candidates, edit and approve of all social media, website and hard copy content for the SOS campaign.

Much of volumes we’ve read so far in various media SOS has published include sheer fiction, and we plan to address these very soon in an upcoming editorial.

Perhaps it’s time for the seven involved in writing and editing to take pause and address something more fundamental, such as the correct spelling of one of the candidate’s names on the website homepage and other places on their SOS website:

March 4 Naumann Screencap Corrected Name

There are three “N’s” in Naumann.

Take your time, though.  Don’t sweat minor details.  Chances are there’s more of your fabricated political spin to get out there first that is more important.

Read Full Post »

Property TaxesWhen Gov. Bruce Rauner suggested withholding half of the municipal share of income tax revenues to shore up state finances, he assumed towns could absorb the loss by dipping into their reserves.

That’s easier said than done in some places, according to a Daily Herald analysis of reserves in 90 suburbs.

The reserves of the 90 suburbs analyzed averaged 60 percent of annual expenses. Besides Island Lake with its deficit, only West Dundee, Aurora and Hampshire reported reserves below the minimum suggested threshold. Hampshire reported reserves of just 1.1 percent of the village’s annual expenses last year. Four more towns — Antioch, Barrington Hills, Carpentersville and Prospect Heights — could drop below two months of reserves after an initial year of income tax cuts.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

The Village has posted a copy of the agenda for this evening’s Equestrian Commission meeting which begins at 7:00 PM at Village Hall.  Topics to be discussed include:

  • [Discussion] Septic Flow Rates – Barns & Stables
  • Horse Density /Livestock Information

It’s unfortunate that an ePacket agenda for the meeting is not available for review.  We would have appreciated a glance, particularly the draft minutes from their special meeting on August 1st when the Commissioners voted unanimously to recommend the retroactivity clause be removed from the LeCompte Commercial Horse Boarding Amendment.

One Commissioner can be heard in the recordings from that meeting stating that keeping the clause would be like “trying to rewrite history.”  Another Commissioner concurred stating “I think it’s totally inappropriate.”  The recording of their respective comments can be heard here.

Their vote to remove that clause was never discussed in subsequent Zoning Board meetings despite the fact that members of the Equestrian Commission were in attendance and chose not to speak.  Nor did Trustee Karen Selman, liaison to the Equestrian Commission, ever bring their recommendation up in any Village Board meeting prior to approval of the LeCompte/Anderson Amendment.

A copy of this evening’s full Equestrian Commission agenda can be viewed here.

Read Full Post »

Trustee Meroni

Trustee Meroni

Monday evening, during the Village Board meeting, Trustee Messer shocked many, but none more than Roads & Bridges Trustee Patty Meroni, when he stated our roads “suck.”  That’s rather pejorative considering Messer was Meroni’s running mate in 2011 and she is now running for reelection.  Nonetheless, she does need to answer why our roads are in such decrepit condition.

A brief review of the background of this issue is in order.

In 2005, the Village Board established a plan to maintain Village roads every ten years based on a rotating schedule of resurfacing.  This meant resurfacing approximately 3.2 miles of roadways per year to achieve that goal.  This road maintenance goal was cited as a reason for multiple tax levy increases.

However, it was recently revealed that just four years later in 2009, the plan was in the hole (or pothole as it were), by 3.26 miles of backlogged road improvements.

Why?  Because the levy increases were not earmarked for roads, and millions of dollars were squandered in legal fees for ill-advised litigation from 2005 through 2013.  We’ve covered that road before in a recent editorial, so we needn’t travel it again now.

What’s concerning to us is ever since Gewalt Hamilton reported last year that we were nearly 5 miles behind in road maintenance, they also reported a significant percentage of roadways that are either in poor or very poor condition.  Why didn’t they report the deficit in road resurfacing back in 2009?

Think about who was in office at the time, and you’ll find the answer.

More concerning is we’ve paid Gewalt Hamilton millions of dollars since 2005, and over $400,000 last year alone and for what?

Since last year’s telling report, Meroni has obfuscated the real roadway issues by bringing up the Cuba Road bridge project and the unanticipated expensive patching of Healy Road.

The Cuba Road bridge replacement has been in the works since before her term in office.  It’s no surprise to anyone.

The decimation of Healy Rd could easily have been prevented had Meroni lowered the weight limit on it when Penny Rd was being resurfaced.  Why didn’t she or Gewalt Hamilton realize dozens of fully loaded gravel trucks used Healy to bypass Penny Rd lane closures daily for months?  Our local roads are not engineered for that amount of stress.

Aside from her repeated smokescreens about such projects, Meroni seems unphased by the significant investments it will require to fix our roads in the next few years and the prospect of higher taxes to do so.  As a matter of fact, at the last Monday’s Board meeting, she said that she believes residents are willing to pay more in taxes.

Perhaps she should run that by Cook County residents who will be writing checks this weekend to pay their first installments of property taxes due on Tuesday.  We doubt they would agree with her, and they’d likely tell her the prospect of higher taxes “sucks.”

–     The Observer

Read Full Post »

Oakwood Farm Operation

After years of debate, Barrington Hills residents finally have rules regarding the number of horses they can board on their property.

Village trustees on Monday voted to overturn Village President Marty McLaughlin’s veto of boarding regulations first approved by the board in December.

The new rules allow one boarded horse per acre on properties 10 acres or smaller. For properties larger than 10 acres, two boarded horses per acre would be allowed.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

2015 ElectionsLast month the Daily Herald provided candidates vying for office in all contested suburban races a questionnaire to complete providing their individual positions on a variety of topics, including property taxes, and whether they thought taxes were too high, low or at an appropriate level in their respective communities.

Following, in alphabetical order, are the six Barrington Hills Trustee candidates’ responses to the Daily Herald’s question regarding property taxes:

Brian Cecola:  “I believe that government should operate in the same way that a family or a business does.  Over the last few years most families and businesses have had to pay close attention to revenues and expenses and tighten their belts.  Government entities should as well.  I am a believer that the village government can operate in a more fiscally efficient manner and I have been impressed with the changes established by the new administration under President McLaughlin’s leadership, particularly in the area of reduced legal fees and general administrative expenses.  I am a strong advocate for continued spending controls and will support any agenda items that improve village operations while maintaining or improving the level of services to taxpayers.  I believe current tax levels can be reduced, especially with families needing some tax relief, most importantly when it comes to their property tax bills.  The cost of our village government only makes up about one fifth of the total of our local property tax bill.  If our village can reduce spending and show the school district, library district, fire districts, and townships that smaller government IS possible, perhaps we can establish a new pattern of behavior for all taxing bodies to emulate.”

Bryan Croll:  “In Barrington Hills, property taxes are the main source of revenue, but of the amount homeowners pay in property taxes to the counties, the village itself only receives about 18 percent of the total.  That 18 percent is the area trustees have influence over.  My focus would be to look for areas to trim the budget.  I think there is room to reduce the budget by about 7 percent from $8.4 million to $7.8 million over the next few years by saving on expenses like legal fees and 911 consolidation.  Last year, the first full year under new village leadership, spending came in $448,000 under the $8.4 million budget.  That’s the good news.  The bad news is that these savings needed to be added into the 2015 road repair budget because the prior administration consistently underfunded its 10-year road maintenance plan, spent the money elsewhere, and created a backlog of 4.79 miles of road that will cost taxpayers $4 million-$5 million to fix.  This is on top of the regular $1 million the village spends on road repairs every year.  Just clearing that backlog at the same rate of $448,000/year will cost the village over 5 percent of its budget every year for the next 10 years.  The village saved enough money last year to offset one-tenth of this deferred maintenance, but will need to continue to come up with extra money each year for another decade just to catch up, making it more difficult to reduce overall spending and deliver the budget reductions our taxpayers deserve.

Michelle Nagy Maison:  “I think property taxes in Barrington Hills are too high. Local taxes only account for 18 percent of the total bill but the goal is always to increase efficiencies to get taxes lowered for already overburdened taxpayers.  We can achieve this by continuing to work to reduce the village’s spending.”

Patty Meroni:  “Barrington Hills has no sales tax. Property taxes are high.  First, Barrington Hills is in four counties and two school districts, so taxes vary.  The property tax portion that our village government controls is less than 20 percent of a resident’s property tax.  School districts represent about 60 percent of a resident’s property tax bill.  Nevertheless, our property taxes are high and need to be addressed.”

Mary Naumann: “First, we don’t have sales tax.  But property taxes are very high in our village. Unfortunately, the bulk of our property taxes, schools for example, are out of our village government’s control.  However, while the part of our property tax bill controlled by our village government is below 20 percent, I feel we must be willing to trim where we can without detracting from the public services our residents rely on.”

Karen Selman: “There is no sales tax in Barrington Hills.  Property taxes are high in the village.  First, Barrington Hills is in four counties and two school districts, so taxes vary.  The property tax portion that our village government controls is less than 20 percent of a resident’s property tax bill.  School districts represent almost 60 percent of residents’ tax bills.  Nonetheless, our property taxes are high and need to be addressed.”

Read Full Post »

SOS 2January proved to be another good month for campaign donations to the SOS Party.  Despite the fact that the party has yet to release a campaign platform, they raked in over $20,000 last month from at least three donors who exceeded the $1,000 threshold requiring reporting.

The three donors named in filings are:

  • Lori Elder – $5,000 on January 10th
  • Paul Loeber – $5,000 on January 31st
  • R. Davis – $10,800 on January 31st

This brings the total reported cash raised by the SOS Party to $41,300 since its formation in December.  However, since donations under $1,000 are only reported quarterly, the sum is likely higher.

The filings for these donations were again submitted by Laura Jacksack, a political and election law attorney.  It seems clear that neither the candidates, nor their committee treasurer or chair want to have anything to do with financial filings.

Considering what Trustees Meroni and Selman went through with the State Board of Elections nearly four years ago (which resulted in two year probation for their former Save 5 Acres committee), this seems prudent.

The committee also released their quarterly expenses for the period ending December 31, 2014, which revealed the name of their website developer.  Rather than using a local resource which created the website for their Save 5 Acres campaign and the “Don’t Change Barrington Hills” site, Meroni, Naumann and Selman opted to use Old Town Media in Ft. Collins, Colorado.

The location of Old Town Media did ring a bell with us, and as it turns out, a former village resident who used to be very politically active in the Riding Club moved to Ft. Collins a few years ago, so perhaps he’s lending a hand.  And, perhaps not so coincidentally, this person’s daughter works for Old Town Media as a Marketing Assistant, as shown in the company’s directory.

Once again, we’ll be keeping readers updated periodically on the two campaign committees leading up to the April 7th elections.  In the meantime, those who wish to review SOS Party filings with the Board of Elections can do so by clicking here.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »