Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Wirepoints’ Category

By: Mark Glennon, founder of Wirepoints

Confidence of Americans in their elections is “notably one of the worst ratings” across the world’s democracies,” says the Gallup polling firm, which found lower ratings only in Chile and Mexico.

Regardless of whether you think our elections are clean in fact, don’t deny that public confidence in them has crumbled or that lost confidence, in itself, is dangerous – and potentially explosive.

And don’t think for a minute that lost confidence is limited to Trump supporters who deny the 2020 election results. Poll after poll says otherwise. A recent Public Affairs Council/Morning Consult poll found that only a bit over one-third (37%) of Americans believe the coming elections will be honest and open to all eligible voters. Another poll by the Angus Reid Institute found only a third of Americans saying they’d accept the results of the coming 2024 presidential election regardless of the victor. And a Rasmussen poll found that a majority of independents and a majority of Democrats, as well as others, are concerned that cheating will affect the outcome of the next presidential election.

Lost faith in elections means lost faith in government’s legitimacy, which is the dangerous part. It’s the route to extreme division and strife, perhaps leading to violence. And lost faith in government’s legitimacy may well be the path we are on, as other polls show. Last year, according to Pew Research Center, just 20% said they trusted the government always or most of the time. It’s hardly just conservatives, again, when it comes to lost faith in government. Only 25% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say they trust the federal government always or most of the time, Pew found.

Illinois, however, has embraced the measures contributing to that lost confidence in elections.

Some were in a boast by Gov. JB Pritzker on election day last month, writing this on Facebook and Twitter: “Here in Illinois, our elections are protected. We’re not scared of more of our people exercising their right to vote. That’s why we’ve expanded early voting, curbside voting, and made the vote-by-mail registry permanent to protect your fundamental right.”

Pritzker was mocked brutally for those claims in a huge number of responses, almost all of which were negative.

The consequences of lost confidence played out in the March primary election for Cook County State’s Attorney. That race attracted national attention because it pitted Clayton Harris, who opponents regarded as a criminal-friendly successor to Kim Foxx, against Eileen O’Neill Burke, who claimed to be for law and order.

Read more here.

Related:81% of registered Illinois voters failed to turn out for April primary

Read Full Post »

By Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner | Wirepoints

We recently wrote about the worsening voter turnout of Illinois’ primary. In Sangamon County, home of our Capitol, just 13.9% voted. In Winnebago County, it was 14.1%. And in Chicago, voter turnout was just 25.9% – the lowest since 2012. We estimated overall statewide turnout would be about 20% overall.

Now official data shows turnout was a bit worse than that, at 19.1%. That’s the lowest presidential primary turnout since 1960, according to the Illinois State Board of Elections.

Blame voter apathy on a lack of competitive elections. On gerrymandering. On the concern people have, thinking their votes don’t matter. It’s likely a little bit of each.

A new WTTW piece covers some of those issues well. Nearly 9 of every 10 state and judicial primary races had only a single candidate or no candidate running at all, WTTW reported.

What that leads to is uncontested races…and nobody showing up.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

By John Kass | JohnKassNews.com

As a life-long, big city newsman so focused on work that my musical choices involved only news radio jingles, I no longer enjoy listening to news on the radio. Why?

Because it’s mostly biased corporate leftist crap, and I keep fretting about whether Alexander Soros has purchased this local news station or that one and bent its newsroom to his daddy’s will as if they were the once-thriving Cambodian middle class.

Meanwhile cable TV news is so full of snickering liberal rage, and pouty left-wing news presenters with epic hair, that I can’t stand it.

But I’ve come up with a positive alternative:

National People’s Radio.

Que the Pan flutes and the bird sounds from the Amazon rain forest. Yes, the time has come.

And, added plus, “free” public television with programming set up by a corporate board of prominent American conservatives including the scholar Victor Davis Hanson, radio broadcaster Dan Proft, Tom Bevan co-founder of Real Clear Politics and University of Chicago Professor Emeritus Charles Lipson.

For example, we’d have President Joe Biden, accompanied by those Pan Flutes playing the theme of Cmdr. McBragg, telling the story of Joe’s heroic Uncle Ambrose being devoured by cannibals in New Guinea. Whether it happened or not. You can’t make omelets without breaking a few eggs, right Walter Duranty?

And lengthy panel discussions on “It’s the Economy Stupid” about how much things cost at the store, what they cost now and how great things were BJ (Before Joe) and droll comedies from Britain on the humorous antics of liberal chumbolones, and sad dramas from Britain about sad middle-class depressives.

We’ll have sports too, from 24-hour fly fishing to 24-hour soccer that often ends 0-0, and city apartment terriers killing alley rats.

We’ll call that one about the rat-killer “Prince of the City” along with a kid’s cartoon show on the heroic “Prince” protecting a multi-racial family from cartoon rats.

To fund it all, we’ll invoke a complicated hidden federal tax scheme replete with complicated grants and call it just a bunch of “grants” that are all much too intricate for Americans to bother about in Congress. So I hope you’ll never get to the bottom of it and the money keeps flowing in to support my elitist fly-fishing documentaries and scoreless soccer.

Wait a minute. You don’t think Americans should pay for red-blooded rat hunting sports and right-wing comedies on the death of the citizen and fly-fishing stories with corporate “sponsorships” to entertain a tiny fraction of the population?

Buzz off, fascist.

Read more here.

Related: “NPR Scandal Should Kill Taxpayer-Funded Broadcasting,” “National Public Radio’s Debacle and the ‘Vibe Shift’

Read Full Post »

By Charles Lipson* | RealClear Politics

“I don’t want any yes-men around me,” said Sam Goldwyn, the Hollywood producer famed for his movies and malapropisms. “I want everybody to tell me the truth even if it costs them their job.” The brass at National Public Radio must have heard Sam, but they add a slight amendment. We want only “yes-men” (they/them) and will boot anyone who dares to dissent.

Lest there be any doubt, NPR just proved it by suspending, without pay, the staffer who exposed the pervasive problems there. He dared to write publicly that that National Public Radio was uniformly ideological, deeply committed to its strident left-wing views, and determined to exclude any alternatives. For saying that out loud, they cut off Uri Berliner’s paycheck for five days. It’s their way of saying, “Thank you for your feedback.” Q.E.D.

Berliner, disgusted by NPR’s response, resigned Wednesday with a fiery statement: “I cannot work in a newsroom where I am disparaged.” Who could?

There are really two problems here, not one, and they go well beyond one journalist’s resignation. The first is political bias, which is a problem at all “elite” networks and newspapers, where “hard news” is heavily slanted. The second is that some of these outlets, notably NPR, PBS (the Public Broadcasting System) and their local affiliates, receive taxpayer funding.

Let’s take political bias first. It was once a cardinal rule of journalism that partisan or ideological viewpoints should be confined to editorials and opinion columns. The goal was to keep editorial views out of hard-news reporting, as much as possible. To do it, the editorial staff constantly fought with the business team, who wanted coverage to favor their advertisers.

Those days are long gone and so is even the ideal of unbiased coverage. We have returned to an earlier era when American newspapers were closely affiliated with political parties and local political machines and covered the news to favor them. Today’s newsrooms have revived that stance. They are as ideologically driven as a gender-studies class at Smith College. If you depart from that ideology, you are out, like Bari Weiss at the New York Times.

Because newsrooms now have so few dissenting voices, reporters and editors live inside the bubble and hardly notice their surroundings. If they do, they are determined to preserve that insularity.

The fragmentation of today’s media landscape encourages these strong, partisan stances. Newspapers, magazines, cable networks, and podcasts know the market is finely sliced. They have strong incentives to choose a narrow slice for themselves and appeal to it by confirming their audience’s bias, not challenging it. That’s as true for right-wing talk radio as it is for left-wing public radio.

Read more here.

*Charles Lipson is the Peter B. Ritzma Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Chicago, where he founded the Program on International Politics, Economics, and Security. He can be reached at charles.lipson@gmail.com.

Related:National Public Radio’s Debacle and the ‘Vibe Shift

Read Full Post »

By Mark Glennon | Founder of Wirepoints

If you haven’t read it, you’ve missed what every journalist in America has probably read: a brutal column on how National Public Radio (NPR) lost America’s trust, written last week by a 25-year NPR veteran, Uri Berliner.

It may be shaping up as a game-changer, but not because it exposed anything new.  It didn’t, but this time, most every national news outlet in America reported on Berliner’s column and, more surprisingly, didn’t deny much of it.

Berliner’s column seems to be cranking the spotlight on mainstream media up to full blast. NPR may be among the very worst, but much of what Berliner wrote applies to much of the traditional news media. Hopefully, all media will get the message – in Illinois, too.

NPR, as Berliner describes, is hostile to viewpoint diversity, staffed entirely by leftists and woke to the point of silliness. NPR, he says, embraced a knee-jerk, activist, scolding posture, representing the “distilled worldview of a very small segment of the U.S. population.”

Most importantly, Berliner describes how NPR willfully distorted the news. It peddled the Russia collusion hoax, rejected any coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop and its evidence of Biden family corruption, and censored criticism of establishment views on Covid.

That’s what most Americans already know, which is part of Berliner’s point. NPR’s audience has consequently shrunk to a niche on the far left, he explained. For NPR, Berliner says, that’s “devastating both for its journalism and its business model.” [Emphasis added.]

People are consuming less news, worsening the financial plight of traditional news media, though the downturn has hit most newer, online sights as well.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

Wirepoints President Ted Dabrowski testified on April 10, 2024 to members of the House Revenue and Finance Committee at the invitation of Rep. Joe Sosnowski. Ted told lawmakers that the state’s property tax burden has become dire for countless Illinoisans. Incremental reforms will never solve the problem and are a waste of time. The only way to bring property taxes down is to focus on eliminating their cost drivers: out-of-control labor and pension costs, misallocated education spending, bloated & duplicative local governments, and more.

View the testimony here. Download a copy of Dabrowski’s presentation here.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts