The Village has released audio recordings from the August 15th Zoning Board of Appeals continued public hearing regarding proposed amendments to commercial horse boarding codes. The menu of edited recordings by agenda topic can be accessed here.
Before the hearing began, Dr. Gwynne Johnston, chair of the Board of Health, made a brief presentation on the board’s positions on horse boarding and well water quality. A copy of his presentation can be read here, or the audio recording can be heard here.
The Board of Health has begun a long-term study of water samples from nine wells throughout the Village, beginning with baseline sampling for long-term tracking of any changes to water quality, due to any number of factors, including horse keeping and boarding.
While their focus has been on “sub-surface” water, however, Gewalt Hamilton has been studying the Flint and Spring Creek waterways in Barrington Hills, and their February 2016 report to Bob Kosin, Village Administrator, indicated water testing levels above acceptable limits for fecal coliform, phosphorus, etc., as depicted below:
A copy of the complete Gewalt Hamilton surface water testing report can be viewed here. We suggest that the Board of Health participate in this ongoing study as well, since it’s unclear what Mr. Kosin does with these reports.
The next person to speak was John Blackburn of Blackburn Architects, the firm that designed the proposed HARPS facility in unincorporated McHenry County for the developers of Barrington Hills Farm. The chair allowed him to speak next since he was purportedly scheduled to return to Washington, D.C. (However, he remained in attendance for the entire meeting.)
Blackburn provided a summary of his experience and his philosophies for designing equestrian facilities which must include the health needs of the horse, the needs of the owner and must meet the demands of the site where the facility is to be built.
At no point did he mention consideration of surrounding properties. Similarly, his design of the HARPS facility calls for parking stalls for ten horse trailers near a northern border of the development — closest to the neighboring Barrington Hills residential properties, as seen here.
When Blackburn concluded his remarks, a ZBA member asked his opinion on how much space is needed for horses in order to have a “successful horse facility?” Blackburn responded, “Generally the rule of thumb is an acre per horse,” but stressing that each property is different. That exchange can be heard here.
Later on, Blackburn was asked the same question, but with more qualifications such as if the horse is fed grain and other nutrients such that they aren’t reliant on grazing on grasses for sustenance, would his one acre rule of thumb apply, and he answered with a qualified “yes” as can be heard here.
When the public hearing was opened, the first person to speak was the chairman of Barrington Hills Farm. During his testimony, he stated, “Barrington Hills Farm invested significant money and effort based on the village’s identity as an equestrian community and the current ordinances in the village code.”
By “current ordinances,” we assume he referred to the LeCompte/Anderson code.
He went on to state, “Both the village’s longstanding image as an equestrian community and Barrington Hills Farm’s purpose in acquiring land in Barrington Hills will be devastated by the proposed amendment.” Both statements can be heard here.
When a board member asked him when the Barrington Hills Farm property was purchased, he replied, “I don’t have an exact date.” When asked if it was prior to 2015, he responded, “Oh, hell, I don’t know.” The recording of this exchange can be heard here.
The McHenry County records show most, if not all, of the property titles that make up Barrington Hills Farm were transferred on September 29th and 30th of 2014. One can assume negotiations and closure of the sale of those properties occurred at least a month or more prior to those dates.
The LeCompte/Anderson horse boarding code was not approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals until early December of 2014, and it was not passed by the Board of Trustees until February of 2015. As a matter of fact, in early September of 2014, the Zoning Board was still considering four separate boarding text amendments before them from four residents according to records.
And, as we’ve previously written, most of the 602 acre Barrington Hills Farm property is in unincorporated McHenry County, and Barrington Hills codes do not apply to the present or future development plans of his organization.
The balance of the nearly two and a half hour meeting revealed nothing new to report. It was too much more of “he said, she said” banter that’s really unproductive, so much so, that even those in the audience who are allies of a given speaker are even telling them to sit down.
What is clearly evident is some in our community are attempting to stall the progress of the Zoning Board, and most are now becoming weary of it. We’re aware of why some are stretching this out, and we’ll be reporting the reason at a future date.
In the meantime, the next meeting of the Zoning Board is scheduled for Tuesday, August 30th at 6:30 PM at Countryside Elementary School.
Revisionist History
Mr. Davis’ latest community letter and public comments appear to link his commercial and developer investment interests at Barrington Hills Farms (BHF) to his desire to influence outcomes of commercial zoning. Coupled with ex-ZBA Chairperson’s, Judith Freeman, endorsement email; they attack the proposed Amendment before the ZBA without referencing that it was the February, 2015 Anderson II Text Amendment that gutted our residential rights with unchecked commercialism.
The BHO correctly states that the “expert” witness invited by Barrington Hills Farms clearly stated that one horse per acre was good policy. Anderson II’s current code allows 10 commercially boarded horses, plus additional owned horses, on 5 acre properties. Furthermore, witness stated every property is different. That describes special use process historically used in Barrington Hills and supported by Ms. Freemen in 2011. However, her ZBA changed that in December, 2014, eliminating home occupation. Need to support Oakwood Farms with a 7 year retroactive provision motivated this unchecked commercial expansion.
BHO offers evidence that Mr. Davis purchased the property prior to the passage of Anderson II, yet Mr. Davis states under oath that he purchased the property knowing that law was in place.
How?
Is the meeting on Tuesday August 30th at 630pm or 730pm?
Very good summary. Davis’ lawyer remembered the purchase was in 2014 – blows JR’s “substantial investment” out the window.
Another “Dear Neighbor” letter went out, claiming current ZBA deliberations are threatening horse boarding and equestrian life style. More lies.
Former ZBA Chair recently sent an email blast referencing the Dear Neighbor letters (opposing amendmening the Anderson II). She must have forgotten that she, as ZBA Chair, promoted Special Use permits for big commercial boarding barns – until they had to shift gears to “make LeCompte legal”.
James T. O’Donnell
(not the former Plan Commissioner)
The August 30th meeting begins at 6:30 PM.
Just now Gewalt is testing our waterways! Interesting since for years I have confirmed fecal coliform contamination in stormwater runoff from neighboring properties onto my land – yet my cries for assistance were ignored. Now our overpaid village engineer has jumped on the bandwagon. What needs to be done before we decry horse manure as the culprit is to examine septic performance for properties. Has our engineer been complacent in covering up any septic failures and his inspections? Then ask yourself who would benefit if this is true?