A wave of incumbents will return to school boards across the suburbs, alongside some newcomers, amid ongoing criticism over how school leaders have handled pandemic learning and the gradual resumption of in-person classes — an issue that sparked some of the most contentious elections in recent memory.
Emotions ran high this election season due to the pandemic affecting communities across the suburbs differently, as local school boards struggled to keep pace with evolving health guidance while facing criticism from parents and teachers alike.
In District 220, where 11 candidates were vying for four board seats, two of the winners — newcomer Erin Chan Ding and incumbent Sandra Ficke-Bradford — were endorsed by the Barrington Education Association. But union-backed candidates Lauren Berkowitz Klauer and Thomas J. Mitoraj lost.
Instead, voters picked Katie Karam and Steve Wang — endorsed by the GOP-backed ACTION PAC, or the Advancing Change Together in Our Neighborhood political action committee. They, along with fellow slate member Malgorzata McGonigal, criticized the school board for staying in remote learning last fall.
“It was more emotionally intense than any election that I remember for Barrington 220,” said Chan Ding, of South Barrington. “When to reopen schools, the approach that we should take, and the national partisan nature of that debate also filtered into our local school board election. There was an anti-teachers union sentiment that we have never seen this intensely before.”
Chan Ding said that by electing two candidates each from opposing camps, voters have signaled their desire to have a wide range of viewpoints and ideologies represented on the board. “We know that our approaches are different and at the same time we know that our goals are similar,” she said.
The divisiveness seen in this election has been long prevalent in the community, said Wang, of Barrington.
“The goal is to make sure that we provide the best possible environment for our children and to make sure that our community heals from all of this divisiveness over the last several years,” he said.
Read more here.
Really? Chan Ding? Again? Ummmm… if you’re going to keep calling your new darling, when are you going to question her on her violations of campaign disclosure laws? When are you going to question her about her illicit dealings with Kazimier and Ficke-Bradford, the grooming she received, and the actions they took that caused another candidate to drop out of the race? When are you going to ask her about her ties to union money that funded her materials that didn’t disclose who they were paid for by in violation of campaign disclosure laws? I’d like to hear from some of the other winners Herald, Shaw and Trib. Once again, your true colors shine through. Ding Ding Ding!
I am so glad the media finally is shedding light on the fact that our local school board elections for years have been slanted with the heavy hands of teacher unions money and influence pushing candidates down the throats of our community. So a group of moms and dads get together to push back (Action group) and they are partisan? Really!
In many cases those that the teachers union supports have a direct connection as they themselves are members of that union. Conflict much? Prior board members have voted on pay increases and whether in our school district or not those increases are used as benchmarks for other districts to compare for other school boards it is a cycle which has over 20 years caused teachers pay rates to increase at more than double the rate of inflation.
We all feel the impact in our wallets when our local school districts make up more than 70% of our property tax bills. Worse all these unsustainable pay increases for (teachers and more importantly overpaid administrators) are calculated in the teachers pension payments which last for 30 years or more after their retirements. That kind of financial burden really leaves a mark on those who stay in Illinois.