Once the Resolution before the board was motioned and seconded, discussion on the matter by the board was opened. The third commenter was Trustee Karen Selman who stated for the record the following:
“Most of us weren’t here during this whole thing, so, and, that’s probably a disservice to this contract in that now we’ve come on to the scene, um, we’re way down the stream.”
Had any of the three recently elected board members uttered something like this, it would be understandable. However, in Trustee Selman’s case, it is not understandable since the only Trustee with more experience and first-hand knowledge in the matter than Selman was Fritz Gohl.
We can only speculate as to why Selman chose the words she did given her more than four years of first-hand exposure in meetings that most certainly covered a number of the issues between the Village and our police force. (Her statement was disingenuous at best.)
What’s more dumbfounding, however, is why she was the only board member to vote against the Resolution considering that opposing it would only serve to continue the “hemorrhaging” of legal fees and create a deeper chasm in the relationship between our sworn police officers and our Village Board had the Resolution not passed.
– The Observer
